Obbligazioni perpetue e subordinate Tutto quello che avreste sempre voluto sapere sulle obbligazioni perpetue... - Cap. 1 (8 lettori)
- Creatore Discussione negusneg
- Data di Inizio
-
- Tags
- additional tier 1 bail in basilea 3 coco bonds crd iv genussscheine grandfathering hybrid bond loss absorption lower tier 2 make whole amount matusalem bond obbligazioni irredimibili obbligazioni perpetue obbligazioni subordinate perpetual bond preference shares restricted tier 1 tier 1 upper tier 2
- Stato
Zorba
Bos 4 Mod
A noi interessano solo i Tier-1
. Cmq come ampiamente previsto, cederanno sulle minorities (altrimenti come si reggerebbe il sistema incrociato tedesco) e i fondi liquidi. Se così fosse... chissenefrega...
Banks win battle for limits to Basel III
By Patrick Jenkins and Brooke Masters in London
Published: June 24 2010 19:13 | Last updated: June 24 2010 22:44
Plans by global regulators to compel banks to set aside billions of dollars in extra capital to cope with future crises are to be pared back after intense lobbying by the industry.
After wrangling over the details of a regulatory overhaul published six months ago, a consensus on the Basel committee is suggesting that its proposals be thinned down.
The most significant change to the proposed reforms concerns the committee’s recommendations on the volume of liquid funds that banks should hold to protect them against another financial crisis.
Proposed short-term emergency funding measures will go ahead. But the committee is likely to shelve the idea that banks should be forced to maintain a longer term “net stable funding ratio” that aligns the maturity of their assets and liabilities. That contentious proposal, fiercely opposed by the banks, could be replaced by an alternative system of oversight, said officials close to the drafting process.
Bankers said that the modified blueprint would prevent an excessive hike in funding costs and in borrowing charges for customers. Some executives had argued that the liquidity measures outlined six months ago could cost the industry up to €5,000bn in additional costs.
Analysts had also calculated that the Basel III reforms, were they implemented in conjunction with new taxes around the world – such as the liability tax announced by the UK government this week – could have cut a typical bank’s return on equity from 20 per cent to 5 per cent.
Scaling back its proposals would allow the committee to publish a basic foundation for the new rules on time, even though disagreements on some of its most contentious proposals on capital, liquidity and leverage are unresolved.
The changed stance, however, which follows intense lobbying by the banks, will be criticised by hardline reformers as a retreat.
Other issues, such as the capital treatment of banks’ partially owned subsidiaries and pension deficits, may be the subject of only minimal international rule making, at least in the short term. More radical reformers worry that delegating too much to national regulators will make a nonsense of efforts to create a globally co-ordinated approach.
“The Basel committee is trying to give a lot of freedom to individual countries,” said one senior Spanish banker. “But then, you just have a mess, and no level playing field.”
FT.com / Companies / Banks - Banks win battle for limits to Basel III
johnny1982
Forumer storico
ragazzi chiedo lumi per chi ha IW, è un pò OT mi date una mano ???
solamente una cosa, non so se siete a conoscenza :
- se io apro rapporto cointestato e compro un'obbligazione, posso intestarla solamente ad uno degli intestari nel sottodeposito ???
Mi spiego :
il deposito 995872/0 è cointestato
il sottodeposito 995872/1 è intestato a A
il sottodeposito 995872/2 è intestato a B
Le azioni finiscono direttamente nei sottodepositi in quanto nominative, le obbligazioni fondi etc.etc. è facoltà dell'investitore se metterle sulla coi, sul sott. 1 o sul 2...ne sapete qualcosa in più ???
Graciasssss
del tuo quesito non ho la più pallida idea
però di do un consiglio :
MAI cointestare .. son sempre un sacco di casini! se siete 2 persone pagate quei 68€/anno in per 2 conti + deposito e passa paura...
nik.sala
Money Never Sleeps
del tuo quesito non ho la più pallida idea
però di do un consiglio :
MAI cointestare .. son sempre un sacco di casini! se siete 2 persone pagate quei 68€/anno in per 2 conti + deposito e passa paura...
mi sono risspoto quasi da solo : i bond vengono cointestati al 50 % e quindi fiscalmente vanno divisi in parti uguali tra i 2 cointestatari
Ultima modifica:
reef
...
Hai ragione, correggo il post. Grazie
Topgun1976
Guest
Su BBG adesso Swiss Life 524 : 61.5/63
Ai correlazionisti
A me danno 90.5 91,5 Intesa 663
amorgos34
CHIAGNI & FOTTI SRL
A me danno 90.5 91,5 Intesa 663
Ciao Top,
Banca Akros è fuori in lettera a 91.
Appena fatta comprare dal desk della Banca, per un "cliente". Che occasioni!!!!
maxinblack
Forumer storico
- Stato