Ma perché la babbiona sarebbe regina, mentre il cojone della vecchiazza era solo principe ?
Da internet:
On Saturday, May 6, Camilla was crowned queen in Westminster Abbey. Queen Elizabeth II once said she wanted Camilla to be "queen consort" when Charles became king. However, Elizabeth's husband Philip was never king, likely because the title could've outranked her.
E poi, cosa piu' importante
![Sono un dritto :d: :d:](/images/smilies/073.gif)
:
Charles has been king since the death of Queen Elizabeth II last September. While his wife, Camilla, was also crowned at the coronation, because she is not a member of the royal family by blood, she would not take over the throne if Charles were to die or step down.
Da un altro articolo:
Prince Philip, who died on April 9, 2021 at the age of 99, was a highly regarded member of The Royal Family and held the Duke of Edinburgh and Prince Consort titles.
He was initially born with the official title of Prince of Greece and Denmark but relinquished them to marry Queen Elizabeth II, who then made him a Prince of the United Kingdom in 1957. Despite this, he was never once known as a King or King Consort.
This is because of a longstanding royal rule which states that a man who marries a reigning queen can only become a Prince Consort. The title of King is reserved only for a reigning monarch that has inherited the throne, such as King Charles III.
Note that as with most royal traditions, rules are different for men and women which is why Camilla Parker-Bowles can become both Queen Consort and Queen of England. Women who marry into the family are allowed to use the titles as soon as their husbands are anointed as king.
The United Kingdom and the Commonwealth can only have one sole monarch. Despite Camilla being named Queen or Queen Consort, Charles is the only leading royal that has the power to rule.
Insomma, 'a babbiona e' 'na regina di carta
![jolly :jolly: :jolly:](/images/smilies/biggrinjester.gif)