Topgun1976
Guest
Mi ricordo una Allianz2022 che poteva differire e forse anche le Famose iNg Verz ,di certo sono cumulative
Obbligazioni perpetue e subordinate Tutto quello che avreste sempre voluto sapere sulle obbligazioni perpetue... - Cap. 1 (10 lettori)
- Creatore Discussione negusneg
- Data di Inizio
-
- Tags
- additional tier 1 bail in basilea 3 coco bonds crd iv genussscheine grandfathering hybrid bond loss absorption lower tier 2 make whole amount matusalem bond obbligazioni irredimibili obbligazioni perpetue obbligazioni subordinate perpetual bond preference shares restricted tier 1 tier 1 upper tier 2
- Stato
Mi ricordo una Allianz2022 che poteva differire e forse anche le Famose iNg Verz ,di certo sono cumulative
Zorba
Bos 4 Mod
Ciao Riccio
. E' un buon titolo, di cui abbiamo discusso parecchio in passato. Abbastanza stabile come quotazioni. Piuttosto attendi domenica per gli sviluppi di Basilea III: se dovesse passare un grandfathering solo al 2016-2018, Eureko a 83 sarebbe più caro rispetto al gruppetto delle 50k 2017.
Non ho idea sulla speranze di call.
Zorba
Bos 4 Mod
per chi fosse ancora interessato ad acquistarla...
(soprattutto riccio43)
DB mi da UNA sola controparte...
in lettera a 67,50
direi che a questo punto possiamo lasciare stare l'acquisto, anzi meglio pensare alla VENDITA ormai..
Sai pf anche il denaro?
no perpetual no party
Forumer storico
azz, no, non ho chiesto..
ma quello dovrai dirmelo tu, ZOERBACH..
visto che ormai sei tu L'UNICA controparte che vende
riccio43
lupo si lupo no
per chi fosse ancora interessato ad acquistarla...
(soprattutto riccio43)
DB mi da UNA sola controparte...
in lettera a 67,50
direi che a questo punto possiamo lasciare stare l'acquisto, anzi meglio pensare alla VENDITA ormai..
un po' cara
marc
Forumer storico
buon giorno,Mais, Reef, possiamo please aggiungerle alla lista? Thanks!
ieri ho provato a comprare la nuova CNP mi hanno chiesto 100.50
per favore qualcuno sa quanto quota adesso?
Grazie
riccio43
lupo si lupo no
Ciao Riccio
Piuttosto attendi domenica per gli sviluppi di Basilea III: se dovesse passare un grandfathering solo al 2016-2018, Eureko a 83 sarebbe più caro rispetto al gruppetto delle 50k 2017.
Non ho idea sulla speranze di call.
grazie aspetto
Zorba
Bos 4 Mod
azz, no, non ho chiesto..
ma quello dovrai dirmelo tu, ZOERBACH..
visto che ormai sei tu L'UNICA controparte che vende
Se non avessi già finito gli acquisti sul titolo, a 67 sarei più buyer che seller...
A 61 era un gran bel regalo. Tipo la EML 514 a 62, Bawag a 62, etc...
Zorba
Bos 4 Mod
Basel III: The compromise
Sep 9, 2010 01:00 EDT
Basel III
Maybe 9% was too good to be true after all. According to David Walker, of Australia’s Banking Day, a compromise with “nations including Germany, France, Italy and Japan” has knocked 0.5% off the proposed Tier 1 capital requirements, and another 0.5% off the proposed conservation buffer. As a result, banks wanting to pay dividends are now going to have to have a minimum of 8% Tier 1 capital, rather than 9%.
If* the new ratios are strictly enforced once they become fully phased in, this is still a big improvement over what we had before, and a win for the community of global bank regulators. Still, we’re not there yet: final agreement won’t come until the G20 meets in Seoul in November. Fingers crossed nothing else will get diluted between now and then.
*This of course is a big if, and Kindred Winecoff, for one, thinks that it’s hopeless to even dream that it might become reality:
Basel III: The compromise | Analysis & Opinion |
Sep 9, 2010 01:00 EDT
Basel III
Maybe 9% was too good to be true after all. According to David Walker, of Australia’s Banking Day, a compromise with “nations including Germany, France, Italy and Japan” has knocked 0.5% off the proposed Tier 1 capital requirements, and another 0.5% off the proposed conservation buffer. As a result, banks wanting to pay dividends are now going to have to have a minimum of 8% Tier 1 capital, rather than 9%.
If* the new ratios are strictly enforced once they become fully phased in, this is still a big improvement over what we had before, and a win for the community of global bank regulators. Still, we’re not there yet: final agreement won’t come until the G20 meets in Seoul in November. Fingers crossed nothing else will get diluted between now and then.
*This of course is a big if, and Kindred Winecoff, for one, thinks that it’s hopeless to even dream that it might become reality:
Politicians won’t give up their domestic authority or ability to address changing local circumstances, so agreements made in Basel are subject to interpretation, implementation, and enforcement by domestic regulators. The U.S. still hasn’t come into full compliance with Basel II, for example, and there is essentially no recourse for other nations or the BIS to force it to do so.
There’s certainly a coordination problem here: countries have every incentive to drag their feet and watch the rest of the world tighten up, leaving their own banks at a global competitive advantage. But having clear rules and a coordination problem is a vast improvement over having no clear rules at all. And if the G20 can agree to do this in November, I have some hope that they can also commit to hold each others’ feet to the fire going forwards, if one of them starts backsliding.
Basel III: The compromise | Analysis & Opinion |
- Stato