rockytamtam
Forumer storico
Allora meglio la Credit Agricole 7,375% FR0010533554... però anche quella a rischi call e Riccio chiedeva call lontana...
No , chiedeva call NON lontana . Cosa quota questa CA ?
Allora meglio la Credit Agricole 7,375% FR0010533554... però anche quella a rischi call e Riccio chiedeva call lontana...
No , chiedeva call NON lontana . Cosa quota questa CA ?
Hai ragionissima scusami ho letto in fretta .
La CA quando ha call date ? grazie .
Lo penso anch'io , e rendono 200bp-300bp in piùBanks may reduce issuance of bonds designed to bolster equity in a crisis because they offer few advantages over traditional capital securities, according to analysts at CreditSights Inc.
Contingent capital notes, which pay coupons of as much as 9 percent, are growing relatively more expensive as bank regulators insist bondholders contribute to bailouts, Simon Adamson and John Raymond in London wrote in a report. The notes are no longer that much riskier than traditional dated subordinated bonds that pay lower interest, the analysts said.
“When these were thought up, the idea of impairing bonds before a collapse was pretty much unthinkable,” Adamson said in a telephone interview. “These days, instruments like these don’t seem so different because most bank securities are going to be subject to some form of bail-in.”
Contingent capital bonds are designed either to convert to equity or be written down when capital ratios fall below a preset level, typically 5 percent and 7 percent. As regulators increase capital requirements for banks, raising the level when conversion takes place, “higher trigger bonds will be more difficult to sell and might be prohibitively expensive,” according to the report.
Adamson said he expects some issuance to continue in what is “likely to be a limited market.”
Sales may come from lenders seeking to meet Tier 1 capital ratios, the first layer to be impaired in a crisis, according to CreditSights.
To contact the reporter on this story: John Glover in London at [email protected]
To contact the editor responsible for this storyhelley Smith at [email protected]
Scusate per la domanda visto che sono ancora un po in essperto in fatto di perpetue...perchè uno dovrebbe preferire una call NON lontana?...
Per guardare alle perpetue oltre al rischio emittente...rendimento...non si prediligono quelle a call lontane??
Grazie per la delucidazione.
Sì... infatti Riccio chiedeva un'emissione con call lontana.
L'unico motivo per cercarne una con call vicina è la ragionevole possibilità che sia davvero richiamata e, quindi, ci sia un guadagno in conto capitale.