Bund e diavolerie varie: LO SPIACCICAMENTO in diretta!!!!

Goldman Sachs now sees Fed rate increase Tuesday
Fri Sep 16, 2005 02:57 PM ET
NEW YORK, Sept 16 (Reuters) - Goldman Sachs said on Friday it no longer expects the Federal Reserve to pause in its campaign to tighten interest rates at Tuesday's policy meeting.
In a note to clients, Goldman Sachs economists said the energy price shock generated by Hurricane Katrina as well as greater uncertainty about the economic outlook had "created a rationale for a pause."

"However, given the Fed's apparent comfort with market expectations and press reports to the contrary, we reluctantly have to conclude that a rate hike is now the most likely outcome next week," the economists said.

The Federal Reserve holds its next regular policy meeting on Sept. 20, and the majority of Wall Street finance houses polled by Reuters expects another quarter-point rate increase, which would be the 11th in a row.

Goldman Sachs said that over the longer term, the reconstruction of productive capacity destroyed by Katrina would boost both growth and inflation.

"Assuming that the economy proves resilient, as we expect, the longer-term impact of Katrina will be to lift interest rates," they said.

"In fact, given that Katrina has worsened the growth/inflation trade-off, there is a risk of a higher peak in interest rates than before," Goldman Sachs said.

Treasuries falter as inflation fears favor bears
Fri Sep 16, 2005 03:24 PM ET
(Adds analyst comments, updates prices)
By Pedro Nicolaci da Costa

NEW YORK, Sept 16 (Reuters) - Treasury debt sold off for a third session on Friday, sending benchmark yields to one-month highs as bearish technicals and growing inflation fears obscured a Katrina-related plunge in U.S. consumer confidence.

The University of Michigan's sentiment index fell to a 13-year low in September, but the market was too worried about an accompanying spike in inflation expectations to glean any benefit from Americans' gloomy assessment of the economy.

"One-year inflation expectations spiked from 3.1 percent to 4.6 percent, by far the highest reading since 1990," noted Stephen Stanley, chief economist at RBS Greenwich.

Coupled with two regional surveys this week showing a huge jump in factory costs for September, the data suggested the Federal Reserve would err on the side of caution and continue raising interest rates to ward off price gains.

This prospect hurt Treasuries across the yield curve, with benchmark 10-year notes (US10YT=RR: Quote, Profile, Research) losing 12/32 for a yield of 4.26 percent. At the height of the selling, yields reached 4.28 percent, the highest since mid-August and sharply up from 4.21 percent Thursday.

The break above 4.25 percent, a key chart support level, exacerbated the selling. Two-year notes (US2YT=RR: Quote, Profile, Research) also took a hit, slipping 4/32 to yield 3.96 percent from 3.89 percent.

"This move is a broader recognition that the Fed will continue tightening, that there will be significant fiscal stimulus (after the hurricane) and that there are significant risks to the inflation picture," said Joseph Di Censo, a fixed-income strategist at Lehman Brothers.

"The Treasury market has maybe had a moment of awakening here."

It was quite a brutal reality for bonds, too, since investors were reluctant to buy even on weak economic data given the underlying anxiety over inflation.

Five-year notes (US5YT=RR: Quote, Profile, Research) slid 8/32 for a yield of 4.05 percent, up from 3.99 percent. The 30-year bond (US30YT=RR: Quote, Profile, Research) dropped 23/32 to yield 4.55 percent from 4.51 percent.

CONFIDENTLY IGNORING SENTIMENT

Ultimately, the market failed to react to the plunge in confidence primarily because analysts have grown wary of such numbers in recent years.

They have not had a strong record of predicting actual spending, since consumers keep buying cars and homes in earnest even as they complain about their gloomy financial situation to sentiment surveys.

September's drop was unusually large, of course. But that only reinforced a sense that it was simply a knee-jerk reaction to the hurricane rather than the start of a persistent trend.

The index swooned to 76.9 so far this month, the lowest since 1992, from 89.1 in August, according to sources who saw the subscription-only report. Expectations about the future were also at their worst in 13 years.

"These are abysmal numbers, suggesting a deeply pessimistic consumer in the first half of September," said Christopher Low, chief economist at FTN Financial.

But again, strategists would wait for hard data on retail sales before they actually took any market positions based on the fallout of the Hurricane, and weekly chain store sales have so far proven resilient.


© Reuters 2005. All Rights Reserved.

US SWAPS - Inflation, rate worries widen spreads
Fri Sep 16, 2005 03:35 PM ET
NEW YORK, Sept 16 (Reuters) - Spreads on U.S. interest rates widened on Friday on worries that growing price pressure will keep the Federal Reserve on its campaign to increase short-term interest rates, analysts said.
Swap spreads expanded sharply for a second day, widening as much as 1.25 basis points. Ten-year spreads grew to 44.25 basis points, matching their widest closing level on May 23.

Spreads finished wider for the week after tightening earlier this week that was tied to hedge demand on new debt supply.

The 10-year swap yield rose 5 basis points to 4.70 percent, while the benchmark 10-year Treasury yield (US10YT=RR: Quote, Profile, Research) increased 5 basis points to 4.26 percent.

However, the two-to-10-year segment of the swap curve flattened slightly to 35.3 basis points, but finished more than 5 basis points steeper for the week.

Market players brushed off Friday's bond-friendly economic data and falling oil prices, and instead fretted over what the Fed may say in its policy statement after Tuesday's policy meeting, analysts said.

A pair of reports which showed heavy foreign buying of U.S. assets including bonds (USFBT=ECI: Quote, Profile, Research) in July and a plunge in U.S. consumer sentiment (USMSENT=ECI: Quote, Profile, Research) in early September failed to support the bond market, said Beth Malloy, bond market analyst at Briefing.com in Chicago.

NYMEX Oct crude futures (CLc1: Quote, Profile, Research) fell $1.75 to $63.00 a barrel, which was $1 lower than a week earlier.

In a Reuters poll conducted on Thursday, a majority of the Wall Street primary dealers expect the Fed to increase the key fed funds rate, the overnight borrowing cost between banks, for the 11th time since 2004 to 3.75 percent.

Investors lightened on curve-flatteners or bailed out of swaps outright, putting pressuring on swap spreads, analysts and traders said.

"You are seeing a lot of (flatteners) unwinding. And there are inflation worries," Malloy said,

Inflation concerns were heightened on Thursday after a pair of regional Fed manufacturing reports whose price indices rose sharply in September. They suggested that manufacturers paid much more for goods and services, and charged customers higher prices to make up for higher costs.


© Reuters 2005. All Rights Reserved.
 
Giù dalle brande, pigrones, che inizia un'altra settimana di passione :-D - bella l'apertura del bund :rolleyes: ... questo è un'articolo di uno dei più ascoltati opinionisti in materia di FED, buona lettura e buon caffè ;)

Fed Will Raise Rates and Indicate More to Come: John M. Berry
Sept. 19 (Bloomberg) -- Federal Reserve officials are set to raise their target for the overnight lending rate tomorrow, and financial markets have gradually accepted that the devastation from Hurricane Katrina won't deter them.

Trading in 30-day federal funds futures contracts on Sept. 16 indicated that investors accord a 94 percent probability that the target would be raised by a quarter-percentage point, to 3.75 percent, compared with only a 6 percent probability of no change.

On the other hand, there has been widespread speculation that officials will make some significant changes in the forward- looking portion of the statement that will be issued at the end of the Federal Open Market Committee meeting.

Some analysts have suggested the committee might even punt as it did on the eve of the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 when it said that under the circumstances it couldn't assess the balance of risks to economic growth and inflation.

Others have predicted that the familiar words, ``the committee believes that policy accommodation can be removed at a pace that is likely to be measured,'' will be scrapped, or that ``accommodation'' or the notion of ``measured'' rate increases will disappear.

Another possibility mentioned by a few analysts is that the committee will say that the upside and downside risks to price stability are no longer ``roughly balanced.'' That is, that the upside outweighs the downside.

Reasons for No Change

Actually, there are good reasons to expect no change at all in that key paragraph in tomorrow's statement. First of all, removing the word ``accommodation'' would imply that officials believe they have raised their overnight rate target as much as their need to. Or at least that they think that having boosted it by 275 basis points there is a good possibility they are done.

Given the level of inflation pressures in the economy, intensified by surging energy prices, that's a very unlikely conclusion for Fed officials to make at this point.

Second, what would the message to the markets be if the word ``measured'' were removed? That officials were preparing to pause in their drive to move the overnight rate target to the so-called neutral level? Or that they were contemplating a 50 basis-point move at their November meeting?

Balance of Risks

Fed officials certainly don't want to send any unnecessarily ambiguous signals. And again, the degree of inflation pressure would argue against a wording change that could be interpreted as pointing to a pause.

Finally, it isn't at all likely that the balance of risks portion of the statement would be changed. Recall that at the March committee meeting, that sentence was made conditional:

``The committee perceives that, with appropriate monetary policy action, the upside and downside risks to the attainment of both sustainable growth and price stability should be kept roughly equal.''

To say that the upside risk to price stability now is greater than the downside risk would be the equivalent of admitting that ``appropriate monetary policy action'' wouldn't be able to keep inflation under control. That isn't an admission Fed official are about to make.

What Will Change

What will change in tomorrow's statement is that the paragraph explaining how the committee views current economic conditions will undoubtedly expand beyond the usual brief comments on spending, labor market conditions and inflation.

In other words, the officials are going to describe how they expect the economy to evolve in the wake of the hurricane. While Katrina has made it harder to interpret current economic data, they are likely to say, as President George W. Bush said following a meeting with Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan shortly after the hurricane struck, that the overall impact on the U.S. economy will be ``transitory'' and ``temporary.''

So far, that seems to be the case. Consumer confidence has taken a nosedive this month as a result of soaring energy prices, particularly for gasoline. Still, prices at the pump have begun to decline again and crude oil supplies are plentiful enough that only a portion of the oil the government has made available from its Strategic Petroleum Reserve has found buyers.

Spending Stimulus

Furthermore, oil and natural gas production in the Gulf of Mexico is rising and only a few refineries are still shut. Even a small portion of the port of New Orleans is taking ships again. And of the 2.7 million customers who lost electric power, fewer than 400,000, mostly in the immediate New Orleans area, are still without it.

Meanwhile, Bush, widely criticized for the poor federal response to the disaster, seems willing to spend a virtually unlimited amount of government money to make the region whole again -- and in the process rehabilitate his standing in the polls. Two hundred billion dollars is the going figure.

While that would be spent over an extended period of time, it's enough to provide a good deal of economic stimulus, stimulus Fed officials will be factoring into their assessment of where the economy is headed.

Katrina's Aftermath

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. provided its clients with an interesting summation of the situation, as its economists see it, on Sept. 16. ``Most natural disasters imply higher interest rates as the destruction of productive capacity and rebuilding work boost growth and inflation. Although Katrina is likely to be similar in this respect, the energy price shock generated by the hurricane creates a near-term growth risk,'' the economists said.

``This, along with greater uncertainty about the outlook, has created a rationale for a pause in the Fed's tightening campaign next week. However, the Fed's apparent comfort with market expectations and press reports to the contrary, we reluctantly have to conclude that a rate hike is now the most likely outcome next week.''

The response to Katrina will lift growth next year ``and cause the FOMC to push the federal funds rate up to around 5 percent'' the economists predicted.

No one, including Fed officials, knows how high the overnight rate target eventually will go. It's very likely that the responses in the marketplace and in the halls of government to Katrina will make that point higher than it otherwise would have been.



To contact the writer of this column:
John M. Berry in Washington at jberry5@bloomberg.net.
Last Updated: September 19, 2005 00:03 EDT
 
Gastro
please metti in grassetto le frasi più interessanti
noi vecchietti non abbiamo più le capacità di sintesi di voi giuvinastri :eek: :P
 
:uhm: humm
il puerco ha tre massimi decrescenti, 123.40 123.20 e adesso 123.00
minimi decrescenti pure

hai fatto il vertical spread?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Alto