Bund, TBond e i Dannati del carry trade. (VM 91)

Vaccaboia, pure Basso era dopato, st'anno al giro ci tocca mandare Fleu e Dan, altrimenti alla tele non ci fanno vedere un ciclista che sia uno :rolleyes: - superfluo dire che io non vado in bicicletta, troppo pigro :D
 
gastronomo ha scritto:
Vaccaboia, pure Basso era dopato, st'anno al giro ci tocca mandare Fleu e Dan, altrimenti alla tele non ci fanno vedere un ciclista che sia uno :rolleyes: - superfluo dire che io non vado in bicicletta, troppo pigro :D

anche Gipa e Masgui son bei sportivi :P
ti ringrazio per avermi esentato, ghe la fù nò :specchio:
 
dan24 ha scritto:
volumi...che neanche a ferragosto si vedono...6500 contratti sul fib...231K sull'eurostox...uhmmmm qui gatta ci cova...son tutti in attesa...di vedere che fa la Cina domani? impressionante sbatacchiamento di cogliones....su tutti i mercati...

cmq o stanno per tirare la catenella..visto anche l'OI del fib...salito in questi giorni di movimento laterale...o ci apprestiamo a vedere l'esplosione della vola al rialzo con panic buying...e giornate da +3%
domani finta verso l'alto e poi crollo... augh... così parlò nunsochikassparlò :D
 
Investment Strategy by Jeffrey Saut

“The Bull, the Bear, and the Boar”

I was on CNBC’s Kudlow & Company show last week along with two other pundits. John Rutledge was clearly “the Bull” with his rosy economic and stock market outlook, citing such metrics the S&P 500’s earnings yield (earnings / price) being below the yield on the 10-year T’Note (aka, the Fed Model). While I have issues with Fed Model, since it doesn’t work with many of the international markets and doesn’t take into account the business cycle, that is a discussion for another time. “The Bear” had to be Vahan Janjigian, due to his views of waning earnings momentum and rising interest rates. Consequently, I guess I was invited on the show to play “the Boar” given my ambivalence on the major market indexes, despite the fact that I own an awful lot of stocks. Larry Kudlow’s questions went something like this (as paraphrased by me):

Larry: Besides high earnings and low/moderate interest rates, the global spread of capitalism is very bullish, the world’s central banks hate inflation, low tax rates in the U.S., Europe, and even China all explain the worldwide stock market boom. Jeff Saut, what do you think? You’re a skeptic aren’t you?

Me: Not (a Skeptic) on the worldwide stock market boom. We have been unwaveringly bullish on the foreign markets for the past 6½ years and remain so. There will be growth scares where they think China, India, Vietnam, etc. are going to slow, but we think these pullbacks are for buying and remain steadfastly bullish on the international markets.

Larry: Okay, so what’s your problem with the U.S.? Earnings are rising and interest rates are slipping down in the short-end of the market. You heard Bob Pisani; the leaders today were commodities, industrials, and energy. First of all, those are all pro-cyclical / pro-economic growth stocks. Secondly, we had a very good factory orders report today that suggests business capex is moving out of the doldrums. So, what’s wrong with the U.S.?

Me: I own a lot of stocks in the U.S. I am very bullish on a lot of sectors and individual companies within those sectors. For the aggregate indices, however, I tend to use the ValueLine Index of 1700 stocks, because I think it is the best proxy for the average stock, and the ValueLine Index’s median P/E is back close to where it was at its “peak.” As well, by most of the valuation metrics that Ben Graham teaches us in the book “The Intelligent Investor,” stocks are optimistically priced.

When I returned to my office following the show I was greeted with this email, “Hey Jeff, while you didn’t mention it tonight, you did pose the question on CNBC last week – are stocks going up or is the measuring stick (AKA, the dollar) going down? – and your insight did not go unnoticed, as can be seen in the following piece from “Investment Quality Trends” by Kelly Wright. To wit:

“Proper Street etiquette during party mode requires market participants to refrain from questioning the catalyst(s) of the current revelry unless one wants to be perceived as a party pooper. Imagine my surprise then when I actually head an intelligent question asked on television the other day: ‘Are equities rallying, or is the measuring stick (the dollar), weakening?’ Hmmm, a great question; let’s take a look. Well, well, well; since the beginning of 2002, the S&P is up 29% while the dollar is off 30%. Correlations must exist for a reason.

If you don’t conduct any business outside the U.S. you probably don’t give tinker’s diddle if the dollar is going up or down. In fact, Americans have been living off the kindness of strangers for years. This is to say that we owe more than $3 to the holders of our Treasury bonds for every $1 we produce in goods and services. I know, this stuff is exhilarating and just keeps you on the edge of your seat with excitement. For foreigners who invest in dollar-denominated assets, however, this is a big issue. They don’t invest to see their capital erode in value with no end in sight. Someday they will reach their pain threshold and head for the exits. When that day will come is anyone’s guess, but when it does come many dollar-denominated assets will suffer. As for the big party currently underway on Wall Street, well, it sure is fun right now and right now is what Wall Street is all about.”

And “party on Garth” was the cry from the street of dreams as the S&P 500 moved ever closer to its all-time intraday high of 1552.87. The recent surge has carried the S&P higher in 23 of the last 26 sessions for a skein that has not been seen since the year 1944. We don’t know how big a standard deviation event that is, but obviously it’s historic. One thing we do know is that the upside march has lifted the ValueLine Index’s median P/E multiple back to near where it was at “the peak.” When we combine this with the loss of leadership from the small capitalization sector it continues to leave us ambivalent on the S&P 500 even though its all-time high is so close it will probably be bettered.

Despite our index ambivalence, we are still having a pretty good year with names like Whirlpool (WHR/$111.21/Strong Buy), Harsco (HSC/$51.98/Strong Buy), Laperriere & Verreault (GLV.A/C$40.16), and Schering Plough (SGP/$32.96/Market Perform) up substantially. And last week another one of our holdings came to life when Chesapeake Energy (CHK/$35.54/Strong Buy) reported its quarterly numbers. As with Schering Plough, we have used Chesapeake’s convertible preferred in the investment account because we like dividends. Consistent with our re-balancing strategy, however, we are selling partial positions in these names to keep their portfolio weightings in-line with the portfolio’s original objectives. For example, if you bought 1000 shares of Chesapeake’s convert around $90, where it was yielding 5%, the idea of selling 300 or 400 shares at $103 makes portfolio sense to us.

In conclusion, two other of our investment account companies reported last week. Covanta (CVA/$24.62/Outperform) reported an in-line quarter, yet revenues were better than anticipated. Covanta’s story continues to hinge on free cash flow generation and the earnings leverage it provides for debt paydowns and/or numerous, likely-more-accretive growth opportunities, both domestically and abroad. One that has not worked for us has been Intermec (IN/$22.81/Outperform), which reported a really ugly quarter last week, yet the shares didn’t really go down in price. We take that as a pretty positive sign and continue to invest and trade accordingly.

The call for this week: We are in New York City this week at our Canadian Oil Sands Conference, our Uranium Conference, and seeing portfolio managers. Consequently, these will be the only strategy comments of the week. And the “call” is for the S&P 500 to follow the other averages to new all-time highs.

May 7, 2007
 
Fil Zucchi
May 07, 2007 10:30 am



The June edition of Bloomberg Magazine carries a piece raising several warnings about the current m.o. in the Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDO) market. These are the same kind of “issues” many of us in the ‘Ville spotted for more than two years in the subprime mortgage and housing areas, and for two years what we wrote provided a seemingly endless supply of comic relief. Until of course the whole thing came down as the house of cards that it was, and the rest, as they say, is history. So in the spirit of keeping readers laughing for the next two years (perhaps more, perhaps less), here are some of the CDO lowlights identified by Bloomberg:


CDOs are financing a record number of corporate loans to low-rated borrowers that forego standard investor protections... As of mid-March, about $36 billion of loans has been made this year, more than in the previous 10 years combined...


When you talk about no-documentation loans, you can’t have any less of an [underwriting] standard than that. Lenders lower their standards and tell themselves they can put the loans in the CDOs... like that’s somehow burying its toxic waste.


Investors need to worry a good bit about subprime delinquencies spilling over into the CDO market. The scenario where the BBB’s all blow up is a reasonably possible scenario.


The Dallas Police & Fire Pension Fund invested in its first CDO about two years ago to boost returns, according to Richard Tettament, administrator of the $3.2 bln fund. “We were beefing up our risk, and we were hoping for a greater return,” Tettament says. “We have an unfunded liability to pay off.” Tettament says he isn’t sure what type of collateral backs the CDO, though he thinks returns exceeded 20 percent last year.

Let me see if I understand the thought process in the last paragraph: if returns are low and you are trailing your hurdle rate, the solution is: jack up the risk, start hoping, avoid finding out what your higher risk investment consists of, and don’t bother finding out whether the higher risk has actually resulted in a higher return. So that’s the way to work yourself to the helm of $3.2 billion dollars!!!

If a Bloomberg piece is not enough to convince you, you might want to consider that serious concerns about current corporate lending standards have recently been echoed by the likes of the founder of the Carlyle Group, the annual IMF Global Financial Stability Report (which is being pushed by most managed care providers as a formidable substitute to Lunesta), and lastly by Blackrock’s CEO Larry Fink, who recently suggested that “standards of lending to highly-indebted companies “have deteriorated to levels that we never… dreamt we would see.”

Just boys crying wolf I suppose.


http://www.dailyii.com/article.asp?ArticleID=1258830

http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/200...d-fears-blackrock’s-fink-and-bank-of-england/
 
Buongiorno Onanisti :eek: :eek:

Ieri sera ho acceso bloomberg e forse il Dow ha chiuso positivo? sti quazzi...era un pò che non faceva una candelozza verde...OK
oramai è proiettato verso 50000 pure lui :D
 
AAAAAAAA rekkie...!!!!!!!!!! il nikkey leggermente negativo...0,15% ma il SSEC shangai...china....il nuovo mondo.....FINOCCHIIIII.....+3,15% :D :D quasi a 4000 :-o :lol:

uno spettacolo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Buongiorno a tutta la banda

ormai mi sembra bello lanciato verso rialzi quotidiani stile bolla ,
il bello è che sembra titubante !
forse a molti non dispiacerebbe un bello storno e forse sono pochi quelli che
non se lo aspettano da un momento all'altro e non lo temono ,
ma mi sembra che se non capita un evento imprevisto , che peraltro sarebbe solo
il catalizzatore , questi di scendere non ci pensano proprio

bhè complimenti a chi c'è dentro e cavalca l'onda da un bel pò
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Alto