paologorgo
Chapter 11
Breaking Down the Government’s Loss in CIT
November 2, 2009, 2:28 pm
The CIT Group’s prepackaged bankruptcy filing may well end up minimizing the potential harm to its bondholders and to its core customers, millions of small to mid-sized businesses across the nation.
But that’s cold comfort to those outraged that the government’s $2.3 billion investment in the company, made last fall as part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program, will be wiped out through the Chapter 11 process.
Linus Wilson, a finance professor at the University of Louisiana, broke down for DealBook the costs of the CIT’s bailout last fall, and according to his analysis, the government’s investment was in the red from the get-go.
Here’s how Professor Wilson puts the government’s $2.3 billion investment into perspective. If private investors bought an equivalent amount of preferred stock on Dec. 22, the day before CIT was named as a recipient of TARP money, they would have paid only $805 million at that day’s market price.
As The New York Times previously reported, finance experts say the government overpaid for the bank assets it bought, because its chief priority was to stabilize the teetering financial system, not to maximize profit.
But Professor Wilson says that the signs were clear even early on that CIT was a company with severe financial troubles. Furthermore, he added that it was not “too big to fail” and didn’t pose any systemic risk.
“There was no reason why CIT Group should have received the TARP Capital Purchase Program funds for ‘healthy banks,” he told DealBook. “Anybody that looked at CIT Group could have seen from the prices of its securities that it was not healthy.”
He also highlighted the danger of the government receiving preferred stock, which is treated like common equity in bankruptcy — that is, at the bottom of a company’s capital structure, below secured debt and bonds. The government chose preferred stock because it would count toward boosting a company’s capital ratios, which was the primary concern at the time. But little downside protection was instituted.
“Preferred stock is a risky security,” Professor Wilson said. “CIT Group is a hard lesson in the risks taxpayers took investing in the nation’s banks.”
Breaking Down the Government’s Loss in CIT - DealBook Blog - NYTimes.com
tra le poche soddisfazioni del pagare le tasse da noi, il non dovere leggere articoli del genere sapendo che parlano dei tuoi soldi...
November 2, 2009, 2:28 pm
The CIT Group’s prepackaged bankruptcy filing may well end up minimizing the potential harm to its bondholders and to its core customers, millions of small to mid-sized businesses across the nation.
But that’s cold comfort to those outraged that the government’s $2.3 billion investment in the company, made last fall as part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program, will be wiped out through the Chapter 11 process.
Linus Wilson, a finance professor at the University of Louisiana, broke down for DealBook the costs of the CIT’s bailout last fall, and according to his analysis, the government’s investment was in the red from the get-go.
Here’s how Professor Wilson puts the government’s $2.3 billion investment into perspective. If private investors bought an equivalent amount of preferred stock on Dec. 22, the day before CIT was named as a recipient of TARP money, they would have paid only $805 million at that day’s market price.
As The New York Times previously reported, finance experts say the government overpaid for the bank assets it bought, because its chief priority was to stabilize the teetering financial system, not to maximize profit.
But Professor Wilson says that the signs were clear even early on that CIT was a company with severe financial troubles. Furthermore, he added that it was not “too big to fail” and didn’t pose any systemic risk.
“There was no reason why CIT Group should have received the TARP Capital Purchase Program funds for ‘healthy banks,” he told DealBook. “Anybody that looked at CIT Group could have seen from the prices of its securities that it was not healthy.”
He also highlighted the danger of the government receiving preferred stock, which is treated like common equity in bankruptcy — that is, at the bottom of a company’s capital structure, below secured debt and bonds. The government chose preferred stock because it would count toward boosting a company’s capital ratios, which was the primary concern at the time. But little downside protection was instituted.
“Preferred stock is a risky security,” Professor Wilson said. “CIT Group is a hard lesson in the risks taxpayers took investing in the nation’s banks.”
Breaking Down the Government’s Loss in CIT - DealBook Blog - NYTimes.com
tra le poche soddisfazioni del pagare le tasse da noi, il non dovere leggere articoli del genere sapendo che parlano dei tuoi soldi...