Psicologia e mercati pacco doppiopacco&contropaccotto..sig.e sig:il Bund-vm18 (2 lettori)

Fleursdumal

फूल की बुराई
ciao stefano, cambia colori :p

cè per gli OI vai al link che ho postato prima

apertura pesante, punto di snodo sul T-bond la quota totemica 113,5 che fa anche da s1
 

ciubecca

Forumer storico
gastronomo ha scritto:
Grazie Ciube, sei stato chiarissimo - quindi si può pensare che dietro il movimento ed i volumi possano esserci pesantissime posizioni in opzioni ?

da di seguito gli oi ... non saprei se è solo quello ma di sicuro tante opzioni cosi son pesantuccie da digerire se le devi pagare quindi metti il calo € aggiugi questo ... qualcuno che sale sul treno verso sud e il gioco è fatto .. la riprova l'avremo lunedì

vi do il link http://www.futuresource.com/quotes/options.jsp?s=DGBH05&r=DGB
 

Fleursdumal

फूल की बुराई
ahiò ma avete letto, di là nel caffè sotto il regime :eek: , cappuccetto rosso è entrato nel nostro sacro thread pagano ed è uscito strillazzando di aver visto foto porno, cu fu? cuuuuuu fuu? :hmm
 

Fleursdumal

फूल की बुराई
tutta colpa di CiubeBBA una volta che gli avevamo dato la responsabilità di aprire il post, si è dimenticato di mettere il divieto ai minori di 15 anni :rolleyes:
 

f4f

翠鸟科
Fleursdumal ha scritto:
tutta colpa di CiubeBBA una volta che gli avevamo dato la responsabilità di aprire il post, si è dimenticato di mettere il divieto ai minori di 15 anni :rolleyes:

Ciube correggi

adesso non ho tempo, ma poi il sig. Sinibaldo merita cmq risposta 8)
 

gastronomo

Forumer storico
Confondere pornografia ed erotismo :-o è una sindrome acuta di alterata percezione estetica e morale :eek: :-D ;) - si, di una malattia insomma... comunque all'ingresso del 3d dovrebbero esserci appropriati "caveat" .....poi concordo, certe foto non sono il massimo, ma si deve pur fare qualche sforzo per andare tutti d'accordo :)
 

gastronomo

Forumer storico
US Treasuries finally succumb to profit-taking
Thu Jan 20, 2005 09:50 AM ET
NEW YORK, Jan 20 (Reuters) - Longer-dated U.S. Treasury debt finally succumbed to profit-taking on Thursday after their recent relentless rally, though the damage was modest compared to past gains.
The benchmark 10-year Treasury note (US10YT=RR: Quote, Profile, Research) lost 6/32 in price, lifting yields to 4.20 percent from 4.18 percent late Wednesday. In contrast, two-year yields (US2YT=RR: Quote, Profile, Research) held at 3.23 percent as investors unwound a few curve flattening trades -- bets that the Federal Reserve's rate hikes would contain future inflation and so favor longer-term debt.

So far this month, the yield curve had flattened every day but one, delivering bumper profits to those who borrowed short and lent long.

"Every now and then the profits get too tempting and are booked, which of course means unwinding some positions," said one trader at a U.S. primary dealer.

"We seem to have hit just such an inflection point overnight," he added, citing sizable Asian selling of 10-year paper and corresponding demand for two-year notes.

"But the correction hasn't been major -- if anything I'm surprised we haven't steepened further," he added. "It suggests it's too early to call the end of the flattening trend."
The spread between two- and 10-year yields widened three basis points to 98 basis points, though that remained well below its pre-Xmas level of 124 and a world away from last year's highs around 245.

The 30-year bond was particularly badly hit by profit-taking, though that merely reflects the out-sized scale of its recent gains. The bond (US30YT=RR: Quote, Profile, Research) dropped 20/32 in price, while its yield rose to 4.69 percent having closed at a 10-month low of 4.66 percent on Wednesday.

The five-year note (US5YT=RR: Quote, Profile, Research) was relatively steady with its yield ticking up to 3.72 percent from 3.71 percent.

There were no early U.S. economic data but the Philadelphia Fed releases its manufacturing survey for January at midday. Median forecasts are that its main activity index rose to 26.4 from 25.4 in December, while there will be the usual interest in the price and employment indices.

Adding to the long list of recent Fed speakers, Fed Bank of St. Louis President William Poole will give a speech on "The Outlook: Mississippi and the Nation" around 10:10 a.m. (1510 GMT).

Later, Fed Bank of San Francisco President Janet Yellen speaks on "The U.S. Economic Outlook: A Monetary Policymaker's Perspective" around 3:45 p.m. (2045 GMT).

Generally, Fed officials have sounded a little more concerned about the risks of inflation but not so much that the market has begun to fear a quicker pace of tightening.

Futures have already priced in a quarter point hike at each of the next three policy meetings, taking fed funds to 3.00 percent. There is much uncertainty about the path of rates afterward with the market seeing no more than 3.75 percent by year-end but some economists tipping 4.25 percent or higher
 

gastronomo

Forumer storico
Fed will move aggressively to guard inflation-Poole
Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:20 AM ET
TUPELO, Miss, Jan 20 (Reuters) - U.S. price pressures appear well controlled, but the Federal Reserve will move aggressively to protect low inflation if necessary, Fed Bank of St. Louis President William Poole said on Thursday.
Poole noted that core inflation had come in slightly below what the central bank's policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) had expected for the second half of 2004.

"Recent data, then, suggest that inflation is well controlled. The FOMC has emphasized that it is prepared, if necessary, to move more aggressively to protect the relatively low rates of core inflation that now exist," Poole said in a prepared speech to a Mississippi forecasting conference.

Poole said forecasts for economic growth -- as measured by gross domestic product (GDP) -- of 4 percent to 4.5 percent in 2005 were "pretty reasonable", but he warned high productivity and increased globalization may limit job creation.

"It seems likely that labor market conditions will continue to improve and that monthly employment gains will probably exceed by a comfortable margin the roughly 125,000 per month necessary to keep the unemployment rate constant," he said.

"It's an open question, though, whether we will return to the days when monthly employment gains of 200,000 per month or more were the norm, as they were during the last two business cycle expansions."

Job gains averaged about 186,000 a month in 2004, for total employment growth of 2.2 million, according to Labor Department figures.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Alto