bmwz4black
Nuovo forumer
L'Ink l'abbiamo già presa il 1 feb 2013..da allora non abbiamo più i titoli..peggio del nulla non cè niente..Possiamo solo migliorare
Grande Top, hai ragione..allora ci metto la vasellina così miglioriamo
Obbligazioni perpetue e subordinate SNS Reeal in diretta: storia di un esproprio - Notizie, informazioni e commenti (46 lettori)
Grande Top, hai ragione..allora ci metto la vasellina così miglioriamo
amorgos34
CHIAGNI & FOTTI SRL
Grande Top, hai ragione..allora ci metto la vasellina così miglioriamo
Se vuoi i tuoi diritti li compro io a 3 / 5 a seconda della subordinazione.
Come vasellina va bene ?
cumulate
Forumer storico
Topgun1976
Guest
Grande Top, hai ragione..allora ci metto la vasellina così miglioriamo
se dopo quasi 2 anni ti fà ancora male è grave..
il punto è che noi i soldi li abbiamo persi quel 1/2...quindi siamo già stati sodomizzati.. detto questo si lotta fino alla fine,senza esclusione di colpi..sperando che l'ink la giriamo all'agrarioTopgun1976
Guest
quelli sulla 155 li venderei volentieri ma non vedo nessuna quotazione,mentre sulle Lt2 cè bid a 7(sempre sia vero)Se vuoi i tuoi diritti li compro io a 3 / 5 a seconda della subordinazione.
Come vasellina va bene ?
amorgos34
CHIAGNI & FOTTI SRL
Ciao,
una comunicazione di Luca-Varoon-Zorba :
non scrive sul forum perchè è letto anche dalla difesa di JD.
Chiede a tutti una particolare attenzione a quanto viene scritto sul 3d : la difesa di JD ha utilizzato alcune pagine del forum per rafforzare certe sue tesi.
una comunicazione di Luca-Varoon-Zorba :
non scrive sul forum perchè è letto anche dalla difesa di JD.
Chiede a tutti una particolare attenzione a quanto viene scritto sul 3d : la difesa di JD ha utilizzato alcune pagine del forum per rafforzare certe sue tesi.
Ilandro
Forumer attivo
Buonasera sono contento che le legga è un'intimidazione nei nostri ocnfronti ?
Noinon siamo speculatori siamo semplicemente dei risparmiatori a cui hanno rubato i propri risparmi di una vita di lavoro onesto. Invece da quello che risulta anche da accertamenti Giudiziari hanno fatto di tutto per nascondere fatti e bilanci agli ENTI preposti a tutelare il risparmio a livello Europeo ed Internazionale. Come mai hanno appioppato la parte Immobiliare della ABN Amro alla SNS BANK ? Le varie truffe perpetrate dai vari dirigenti ora sotto Giudizio ecc...... Siamo noi i colpevoli !!!!!!!!
maxinblack
Forumer storico
Fri 10 Oct 2014, 18:27
Damages SNS investor staggers
THE HAGUE (REUTERS) -
Damages for investors who lost money through the nationalization of banking and insurance SNS REAAL, has come into question. That's because of an opinion of the Advocate General at the Supreme Court. He believes that a ruling of the Enterprise Chamber of the Amsterdam Court was that of investors, the advantage must be destroyed.
The Enterprise Chamber ruled in July 2013 in an interim ruling that an expert panel had to consider the level of compensation. But according to the Advocate General is not at all that the State must pay compensation. The Enterprise Chamber that was wrong in advance. He wants the case to be redone.
Jeroen Dijsselbloem Minister of Finance had asked the Enterprise Chamber of the compensation should be set at zero euros. Without government intervention, SNS had gone bankrupt. Then investors had also stood with empty hands, he held the judges.
Explanation
This explanation of Dijsselbloem was considered insufficient by the Enterprise Chamber. That played in the discretion of the judges. The Advocate General says the following ,, a possibly insufficient explanation may play in the final decision. Irrelevant by the Minister '
Opinions of the Advocate General are usually adopted by the Supreme Court. Expected that it will take several months before the final court of appeal a decision on that appeal, which had set Dijsselbloem. Against the decision of the Enterprise Chamber
Damages SNS investor staggers
THE HAGUE (REUTERS) -
Damages for investors who lost money through the nationalization of banking and insurance SNS REAAL, has come into question. That's because of an opinion of the Advocate General at the Supreme Court. He believes that a ruling of the Enterprise Chamber of the Amsterdam Court was that of investors, the advantage must be destroyed.
The Enterprise Chamber ruled in July 2013 in an interim ruling that an expert panel had to consider the level of compensation. But according to the Advocate General is not at all that the State must pay compensation. The Enterprise Chamber that was wrong in advance. He wants the case to be redone.
Jeroen Dijsselbloem Minister of Finance had asked the Enterprise Chamber of the compensation should be set at zero euros. Without government intervention, SNS had gone bankrupt. Then investors had also stood with empty hands, he held the judges.
Explanation
This explanation of Dijsselbloem was considered insufficient by the Enterprise Chamber. That played in the discretion of the judges. The Advocate General says the following ,, a possibly insufficient explanation may play in the final decision. Irrelevant by the Minister '
Opinions of the Advocate General are usually adopted by the Supreme Court. Expected that it will take several months before the final court of appeal a decision on that appeal, which had set Dijsselbloem. Against the decision of the Enterprise Chamber
maxinblack
Forumer storico
This reports the Financieel Dagblad Saturday.
The uncertainty arose after an opinion from Vino Timmerman, Advocate General of the Supreme Council.
In July 2013 the Enterprise Chamber ruled that would be given by the State. Victims compensation A panel of experts was to the amount of the reimbursement.
Advocate General Carpenter advises the Council to destroy it. Statement The Enterprise would have gone out of that compensation is in place. Too fast according to him
The Council does not need to follow the advice of the Advocate General but as a rule this happens anyway.
Dijsselbloem
Dijsselbloem Minister (Finance) asked the Enterprise Chamber to refrain from compensation to shareholders of SNS.
The bank would certainly have gone bankrupt without government according Dijsselbloem and then had the shareholders also stood empty handed.
Advocate General Timmerman believes the explanation may play a role in the final judgment and therefore wants the case to be reassessed.
The uncertainty arose after an opinion from Vino Timmerman, Advocate General of the Supreme Council.
In July 2013 the Enterprise Chamber ruled that would be given by the State. Victims compensation A panel of experts was to the amount of the reimbursement.
Advocate General Carpenter advises the Council to destroy it. Statement The Enterprise would have gone out of that compensation is in place. Too fast according to him
The Council does not need to follow the advice of the Advocate General but as a rule this happens anyway.
Dijsselbloem
Dijsselbloem Minister (Finance) asked the Enterprise Chamber to refrain from compensation to shareholders of SNS.
The bank would certainly have gone bankrupt without government according Dijsselbloem and then had the shareholders also stood empty handed.
Advocate General Timmerman believes the explanation may play a role in the final judgment and therefore wants the case to be reassessed.
Ultima modifica:
maxinblack
Forumer storico
Da quello che ho capito, questo Timmermann coclude che l' enterprise Chamber ha promesso una compensazione troppo presto ai Bondholders,e che questa decisione va revocata, in quanto e' stato un errore, e la procedura va riesaminata, e con piu' approfondite spiegazioni da JD arriveremo a un chiarimento per ......inchiappettarci meglio, perche' non credo che questa richiesta di approfondimento vada nella direzione dei nostri interessi.
io lo interpreto cosi':
Per quale motivo vogliono repellere la decisione di compensazione gia' peraltro approvata dalla Enterprise Chamber se non al fine di annullare ogni pretesa di compensazione?
io lo interpreto cosi':
Per quale motivo vogliono repellere la decisione di compensazione gia' peraltro approvata dalla Enterprise Chamber se non al fine di annullare ogni pretesa di compensazione?