U.S. House Rejects $700 Billion Financial-Rescue Plan (Update2)
By Alison Vekshin and Laura Litvan
Sept. 29 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. House rejected a $700 billion financial-rescue plan intended to restore confidence in the nation's banking system, dealing a blow to government efforts to contain a lending crisis.
The House rejected by a vote of 228 to 205 the measure to authorize the biggest government intervention in the markets since the Great Depression.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 554 points, or almost 5 percent to 10,589, at 2:32 p.m. New York time.
``The American people rejected this bailout and now Congress did likewise,'' said Republican Representative Mike Pence of Indiana.
The legislation would have given Treasury Secretary
Henry Paulson broad authority to buy troubled assets from financial companies.
``I'm very disappointed,'' said House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank. ``
The Republicans killed this.'' He said there would not be another vote on the issue today.
President
George W. Bush, who personally lobbied lawmakers to support the measure today, will consult with congressional leaders ``to determine the next step,'' said spokesman Tony Fratto.
`Disappointed'
``Obviously we are very disappointed in the outcome,'' Fratto said. ``There is no question the country is facing a diffcult crisis that needs to be addressed.''
Bush earlier today said it's needed to ``help keep the crisis in our financial system from spreading throughout our economy.''
Federal Reserve Chairman
Ben S. Bernanke warned of ``grave threats'' to the financial system if Congress rejected the plan.
Opponents said the measure was too risky and too costly.
``I fear that ultimately it may not work,'' said Representative
Jeb Hensarling, a Texas Republican, a leader of the opposition. The plan may put the U.S. on the ``
slippery slope to socialism,'' he said.
Lawmakers were reluctant to support the measure a month before congressional elections because some voters viewed it as ``bailing out Wall Street,'' Frank said.
Flow of Credit
The final plan considered by the House would have given Paulson an immediate $250 billion to buy bad loans from financial companies, with the rest to be doled out in stages.
Representative Adam Putnam of Florida, the No. 3 Republican, said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's ``speech cost us votes'' because it set a ``partisan tone.''
In her speech before the vote, Pelosi, a California Democrat, said the Bush administration's policies were ``built on budgetary recklessness, on an anything-goes mentality, with no regulation, no supervision and no discipline in the system.''
The compromise legislation reached yesterday included a proposal by House Republicans, whose objections scuttled an earlier agreement in principle, which provides for government insurance for mortgage-backed securities. The plan included a bipartisan oversight board to monitor to purchase and sale of assets, and imposed limits on the compensation of executives at participating companies.
Paulson and Bernanke proposed the rescue plan to revive lending and restore the flow of credit to the U.S. economy. Opposition to their Sept. 20 proposal for almost unfettered authority to purchase assets has been strongest in the House, particularly among Republicans who balked at its cost and pressed for more taxpayer protections.
House Republican leaders today, in speeches on the House floor, urged their colleagues to support a bipartisan House and Senate compromise crafted over several days.
Still, lingering opposition from many Republicans prompted Democratic leaders, including House Speaker
Nancy Pelosi and Majority Whip
James Clyburn, to circulate among Democrats on the House floor this morning to seek more support.
Il punto è il cosidetto falling knife... per tutti è una grossa opportunità per vincere, o perdere le elezioni. Le elezioni hanno la priorità rispetto alla posta in gioco, quindi la tattica (i voti subito) prevale rispetto a considerazioni di sistema che non solo riguardano la definizione stabile di un equilibrio di lungo periodo, ma la tenuta stessa del sistema, anche nell'immediato...fatico a capire quale sia il senso, non politico, ma pragmatico, nel bocciare il piano in virtù di una bandiera politica. Se il piano fallisce siamo tutti nella c.cc., se passa saranno comunque c.zz. ma almeno qualcosa da giocarsi rimane ...
