Questo è molto interessante. Il trattamento contabile al fair value delle passività sta arrivando al capolinea. Per cui le società/banche non avranno più interesse a mantenere depresse le quotazioni delle obbligazioni subordinate.
Da quel che ho capito, fino ad oggi se una banca aveva emesso dei Tier-1 a 100, la cui quotazione era precipitata a 60, poteva iscriversi un utile a conto economico di 40
. Con questa riforma, le banche non potranno più contabilizzarsi questi utili....
Cmq è pazzeco, se ci pensate. Una banca emette un bond a 100 (e si piglia 100 cash). Poi le quotazioni del bond crollano a 40, per timori sulla solidità della banca: risparmiatori disperati, ma la banca ride, perchè si registra un utile di 60...
*.*.*.*
IASB addresses ‘counter-intuitive’ effects of fair value measurement of financial liabilities
11 May 2010
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) today published for public comment its proposed changes to the accounting for financial liabilities. This proposal follows work already completed on the classification and measurement of financial assets (IFRS 9 Financial Instruments).
The IASB is proposing limited changes to the accounting for liabilities, with changes to the fair value option. The proposals respond to the view expressed by many investors and others in the extensive consultations that the IASB has undertaken—that volatility in profit or loss resulting from changes in the credit risk of liabilities that an entity chooses to measure at fair value is counter-intuitive and does not provide useful information to investors.
When the IASB introduced IFRS 9 many stakeholders around the world advised the IASB that the existing requirements for financial liabilities work well, except for the effects of changes in the credit risk of a financial liability (‘own credit’) that an entity chooses to measure at fair value.
Building on that global consultation on IFRS 9, the IASB sought the views of investors, preparers, audit firms, regulators and others on the ‘own credit’ issue. The views received were consistent with the earlier consultations—that volatility in profit or loss resulting from changes in ‘own credit’ does not provide useful information except for derivatives and liabilities that are held for trading.
The IASB is therefore proposing that all gains and losses resulting from changes in ‘own credit’ for financial liabilities that an entity chooses to measure at fair value should be transferred to ‘other comprehensive income’. Changes in ‘own credit’ will therefore not affect reported profit or loss.
No other changes are proposed for financial liabilities. Therefore, the proposals will affect only those entities that choose to apply the fair value option to their financial liabilities. Importantly, those who prefer to bifurcate financial liabilities when relevant may continue to do so. That is consistent with the widespread view that the existing requirements for financial liabilities work well, other than the ‘own credit’ issue that these proposals cover.
Commenting on the proposals, Sir David Tweedie, Chairman of the IASB, said:
Whilst there are theoretical arguments for treating financial assets and liabilities in the same way it is hard to defend the accounting as providing useful information when a company suffering deterioration in credit quality is able to book a corresponding large profit, especially when investors tell us that such information is often excluded from their financial models.
An IASB ‘Snapshot’, a high level summary of the proposals, is available to download free of charge from the IASB website at
http://go.iasb.org/financial+liabilities.
The exposure draft
Fair Value Option for Financial Liabilities is open for comment until
16 July 2010. It can be accessed via the ‘Comment on a proposal’ section on
www.iasb.org from today.
