'Hindenburg Omen' Tracking Chart![Eek! :eek: :eek:](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f631.png)
![Eek! :eek: :eek:](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f631.png)
![Eek! :eek: :eek:](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f631.png)
The ominous sounding name of this signal comes from the late Kennedy Gammage, who passed away Jan. 3, 2006, just a few months after he retired from writing The Richland Report newsletter. Ken was one of the great proponents of the McClellan Oscillator and Summation Index, and was a big reason why they came to be so well known. The McClellan Oscillator being positive or negative is one of the criteria for a Hindenburg Omen, so it was probably out of working with that indicator that Miekka came into contact with Ken Gammage. I suspect that the idea for the name 'Hindenburg' was related to a similar signal using NH and NL called the 'Titanic Syndrome' which was developed by the late Bill Ohama.
The Wikipedia article contains an early set of criteria for the HO:
1. Both New Highs (NH) and New Lows (NL) must exceed 2.2% of total NYSE issues on the same day.
2. The smaller of these must be greater than or equal to 69 (note: the Wikipedia rules used to say 79, which was more than 2.2% of total NYSE issues for most of history).
3. The 10-week MA of the NYSE Comp (NYA) is rising (i.e. market is in an uptrend, which is important since you don't need an omen that a downtrend might be coming if you are already in a downtrend).
4. McClellan Oscillator is negative.
5. NH cannot be more than 2x NL.