Obbligazioni in dollari Keep Calm And Invest Preferred Shares Usa

  • Creatore Discussione Creatore Discussione Topgun1976
  • Data di Inizio Data di Inizio
Puerto Rico to hold debt-restructuring talks Friday
Jan 27 2016, 02:22 ET | By: Yoel Minkoff, SA News Editor Contact this editor with comments or a news tip
Puerto Rico plans to meet with creditors on Friday to discuss a possible restructuring of $70B of municipal bonds.The talks come as the island struggles to make progress on two tracks, striking deals with bondholders and persuading U.S. legislators that it merits relief from the federal government.Further complicating the process, the territory has more than a dozen types of bonds and is negotiating simultaneously with several creditor groups that have competing claims.
 
Puerto Rico to hold debt-restructuring talks Friday
Jan 27 2016, 02:22 ET | By: Yoel Minkoff, SA News Editor Contact this editor with comments or a news tip
Puerto Rico plans to meet with creditors on Friday to discuss a possible restructuring of $70B of municipal bonds.The talks come as the island struggles to make progress on two tracks, striking deals with bondholders and persuading U.S. legislators that it merits relief from the federal government.Further complicating the process, the territory has more than a dozen types of bonds and is negotiating simultaneously with several creditor groups that have competing claims.

il solito calvario di incontri, discussioni, proposte etc.
la questione è una sola: il Congresso darà l'endorsement per l'allargamento del perimetro del chapter 9 anche a Puerto Rico ?
Vedremo a marzo, prossimo vero appuntamento
 
Puerto Rico targets debt-exchange offer
Jan 29 2016, 03:21 ET | By: Yoel Minkoff, SA News Editor Contact this editor with comments or a news tip
Puerto Rico plans to propose a debt exchange to investors today, offering to swap existing bonds for two new types of securities to help the U.S. commonwealth alleviate its debt burden.Both classes of debt would delay payments, giving the island time to make fiscal adjustments and spur economic growth. One would eventually pay interest at 5%, while the other would carry a value determined by Puerto Rico's fiscal health.
 
Buongiorno a tutti volevo chiedervi se sapete se le preferred shares che qui trattiamo sono titoli al portatore o nominativi

Grazie in anticipo a chi vorrà rispondermi
 
Buongiorno a tutti volevo chiedervi se sapete se le preferred shares che qui trattiamo sono titoli al portatore o nominativi

Grazie in anticipo a chi vorrà rispondermi

Bella domanda.
io credo che le preferred shares tradizionali siano titoli nominativi perché si trasferiscono attraverso la doppia annotazione del nome del nuovo beneficiario sia sul titolo, sia sul registro dell’ente emittente, questo vale anche per i "traditional Convertible Securities”. Qualche dubbio avrei per quanto riguarda iTrust Preferred Securities e gli Exchange-Traded Debt che qui trattiamo.
 
Ahia...
"... The Lender Secured Claims would thus be entitled to the full value of the Debtors and there would be no value left for distribution to Unsecured Creditors...."
Direi che i giochi son fatti... Come la vedete voi in merito alle nostre Pref Miller?
Ciao.
Miller Energy Resources : Bankruptcy Filings Plan Confirmations | 4-Traders

Non riesco seguire molto ma credo di capire che gli azionisti e i possessori di preferred sono contrari al piano di riorganizzazione in quanto li lascia a mani vuote o quasi, Il loro voto contrario non può bloccare il piano ma lascia loro la possibilità di class action contro i vecchi amministratori e contro Apollo & Highbridge Capital Management (i nuovi proprietari o debitori secondo il piano)

Ti riporto una delle tante lettere inviate al giudice del tribunale e messe agli atti.
Office of The United States Trustee
605 West Fourth Avenue
Suite 203
Anchorage, AK 99501-2252
Re: Miller Energy Resources

To the United States Trustee,
My name is Darren McCammon; I am a preferred equity holder of Miller Energy Resources. On October 1, 2015, Miller Energy Resources ("Miller") entered Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in the State of Alaska. I write to you today to request appoint an Official Committee of Shareholders. In my opinion there is substantially more value in Miller than the board and the senior debt holder, Apollo Investment Corporation, are trying to portray and the board of Miller Energy are not adequately representing shareholder interests in this matter.
As a stockholder of CorEnergy Infrastructure Trust (Nasdaq: CORR), I have had a discussion with its CEO regarding Miller Energy. In that discussion he indicated that on two separate occasions CorEnergy approached Miller Energy trying to make a deal to buy and leaseback some of its assets. Unfortunately, he found management at Miller Energy extremely difficult to deal with and unresponsive. Such a deal would very likely have precluded the need for Miller to enter bankruptcy. This leads me to question why senior management at Miller was not responsive. I question whether senior management at Miller Energy wanted a deal, or whether their true motivations were to assist Apollo into pushing Miller into Chapter 11 bankruptcy? I wonder just what incentives current management may have if Apollo is successful in its petition to obtain 100% of the equity in Miller?
Additionally, it is my view that the Board is not, and is not capable of, adequately representing the interests of the equity class. There are currently no ad hoc committees of equity holders, and the Board's historical conduct is currently under investigation with the SEC. On August 6, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a civil action against the Company alleging that the Company overvalued oil and gas properties it acquired in Alaska in late 2009 and that as a result, the Company's financial reports were materially misstated. This by itself brings into serious question the propriety of the Board and warrants appointment of official shareholders representation in the bankruptcy proceedings.
Even Mr. Carl F. Giesler, the current CEO of Miller Energy, alludes to the harm and negative effect on shareholders of recent actions in this 8K filing:
“…The Company had secured from a private financing source a signed term sheet for a more than $165 million loan that would largely refinance the Company's outstanding debt. Additionally, the Company had secured signed letters of intent on several non-core asset sales. The loan and the non-core asset sales, coupled with the cash State of Alaska tax credits owed to the Company, may have provided Miller sufficient funding to restructure its financial position outside of bankruptcy. The private financing source, however, recently terminated negotiations with the Company, citing the initiation of administrative proceedings against the Company by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") Division of Enforcement as well as the involuntary bankruptcy petition filed …”
Please note the actions described if carried out would have paid off Apollo in full and precluded any need to file for bankruptcy. In my opinion this makes clear that independent third parties found more value in Miller
Energy assets than just the debt owed to Apollo. It is also clear the board cannot be trusted to adequately look out for shareholder interests.
I therefore respectfully ask the United States Trustee to exercise her power under Section 1102(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code, and appoint an Official Committee of Shareholders.

Sincerely,

Darren McCammon


Se poi vuoi approfondire
 

Allegati

Allegati

Non riesco seguire molto ma credo di capire che gli azionisti e i possessori di preferred sono contrari al piano di riorganizzazione in quanto li lascia a mani vuote o quasi, Il loro voto contrario non può bloccare il piano ma lascia loro la possibilità di class action contro i vecchi amministratori e contro Apollo & Highbridge Capital Management (i nuovi proprietari o debitori secondo il piano)

Ti riporto una delle tante lettere inviate al giudice del tribunale e messe agli atti.
Office of The United States Trustee
605 West Fourth Avenue
Suite 203
Anchorage, AK 99501-2252
Re: Miller Energy Resources

To the United States Trustee,
My name is Darren McCammon; I am a preferred equity holder of Miller Energy Resources. On October 1, 2015, Miller Energy Resources ("Miller") entered Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in the State of Alaska. I write to you today to request appoint an Official Committee of Shareholders. In my opinion there is substantially more value in Miller than the board and the senior debt holder, Apollo Investment Corporation, are trying to portray and the board of Miller Energy are not adequately representing shareholder interests in this matter.
As a stockholder of CorEnergy Infrastructure Trust (Nasdaq: CORR), I have had a discussion with its CEO regarding Miller Energy. In that discussion he indicated that on two separate occasions CorEnergy approached Miller Energy trying to make a deal to buy and leaseback some of its assets. Unfortunately, he found management at Miller Energy extremely difficult to deal with and unresponsive. Such a deal would very likely have precluded the need for Miller to enter bankruptcy. This leads me to question why senior management at Miller was not responsive. I question whether senior management at Miller Energy wanted a deal, or whether their true motivations were to assist Apollo into pushing Miller into Chapter 11 bankruptcy? I wonder just what incentives current management may have if Apollo is successful in its petition to obtain 100% of the equity in Miller?
Additionally, it is my view that the Board is not, and is not capable of, adequately representing the interests of the equity class. There are currently no ad hoc committees of equity holders, and the Board's historical conduct is currently under investigation with the SEC. On August 6, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a civil action against the Company alleging that the Company overvalued oil and gas properties it acquired in Alaska in late 2009 and that as a result, the Company's financial reports were materially misstated. This by itself brings into serious question the propriety of the Board and warrants appointment of official shareholders representation in the bankruptcy proceedings.
Even Mr. Carl F. Giesler, the current CEO of Miller Energy, alludes to the harm and negative effect on shareholders of recent actions in this 8K filing:
“…The Company had secured from a private financing source a signed term sheet for a more than $165 million loan that would largely refinance the Company's outstanding debt. Additionally, the Company had secured signed letters of intent on several non-core asset sales. The loan and the non-core asset sales, coupled with the cash State of Alaska tax credits owed to the Company, may have provided Miller sufficient funding to restructure its financial position outside of bankruptcy. The private financing source, however, recently terminated negotiations with the Company, citing the initiation of administrative proceedings against the Company by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") Division of Enforcement as well as the involuntary bankruptcy petition filed …”
Please note the actions described if carried out would have paid off Apollo in full and precluded any need to file for bankruptcy. In my opinion this makes clear that independent third parties found more value in Miller
Energy assets than just the debt owed to Apollo. It is also clear the board cannot be trusted to adequately look out for shareholder interests.
I therefore respectfully ask the United States Trustee to exercise her power under Section 1102(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code, and appoint an Official Committee of Shareholders.

Sincerely,

Darren McCammon


Se poi vuoi approfondire

GRAZIE PECO :up:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Alto