Obbligazioni CASINO GUICHARD PERRACHON S.A. (3 lettori)

angy2008

Forumer storico
Stesso mio discorso, qui non dispongo di notizie, mi limito soltanto a dire che chiacchierando con un gestore di team di nota sgr, operativo nell’HY, non ho fatto neanche in tempo a dire il nome completo… appena ho detto Casino’ mi è stato detto ridendo NO NO NO (3 volte)
non che io abbia fiducia nel buon ritorno di Casino, che peraltro ho, ma non sarei nemmeno propenso a seguire i consigli dei gestori perche' altrimenti tanto varrebbe lasciare i soldi a loro e aspettare solo i risultati senza faticare.
 

sandrino

Forumer storico
non che io abbia fiducia nel buon ritorno di Casino, che peraltro ho, ma non sarei nemmeno propenso a seguire i consigli dei gestori perche' altrimenti tanto varrebbe lasciare i soldi a loro e aspettare solo i risultati senza faticare.

Ti quoto al 100%
Tra l’altro so i primi a prende gli schiaffi, i gestori.
Io riporto soltanto per dovere di cronaca
 

pietro17elettra

Nonno pensionato
Casino, Intermarche win fight against EU antitrust regulators
09/03/2023 11:14 - RSF
By Foo Yun Chee
BRUSSELS, March 9 (Reuters) - Casino (CO.EQ) and Intermarche on Thursday won the backing of Europe's top court in their fight against EU antitrust regulators and their attempt to investigate the French supermarket groups' buying alliance.

The case underscores the increasing willingness by some companies to challenge the EU competition watchdog on what they perceive as regulatory over-reach and excessive demands for information.

The European Commission had in 2017 ordered the companies to submit to an inspection on suspicions of anti-competitive practices. It subsequently launched an investigation into their 2014 purchasing alliance which was dissolved in 2018.

Casino and Intermarche protested against the actions and took their case to Europe's top courts.

The Luxembourg-based Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) annulled the EU antitrust watchdog's decision.

Judges said the information obtained by the Commission to justify its demands to the companies "are not substantiated by sufficiently serious indicia".

The CJEU also criticised the competition agency for not recording interviews with the companies' suppliers.

"That obligation applies irrespective of whether the interview in question was conducted before the formal opening of an investigation, in order to collect indicia of an infringement, or afterwards, for the purpose of collecting evidence of an infringement," the court said.

The cases are C-682/20 P Les Mousquetaires et ITM Entreprises v Commission, C-690/20 P Casino, Guichard-Perrachon et Achats Marchandises Casino vCommission, and C-693/20 P Intermarché Casino Achats v Commission.

(Reporting by Foo Yun Chee;Editing by Elaine Hardcastle)
(([email protected]; +32 2 585 2866; Reuters Messaging: [email protected]))
 

pietro17elettra

Nonno pensionato
RPT-Casino bonds drop after holding company seeks grace period
Oggi 14:05 - RSF
(Repeats to additional subscribers)
LONDON, May 23 (Reuters) - Some of Casino's (CO.EQ) unsecured bonds dropped by over two cents on the euro on Tuesday, Tradeweb data showed, after its holding company said on Monday it had started proceedings with a Paris court to negotiate a deal about its debt coming due.

The bonds also dropped as creditors are due to respond to a separate request by Casino at 1500 GMT.

The indebted French supermarket firm had said on April 24 it was considering asking for a court-appointed conciliator to oversee discussions with bank creditors and bondholders over its potential deals with smaller peer Teract and second largest shareholder Kretinsky.



(Reporting by Chiara Elisei; editing by Yoruk Bahceli)
(([email protected];))
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Alto