Obbligazioni societarie Obbligazioni Oil & Gas (2 lettori)

Imark

Forumer storico
E l'emissione di titoli destinati al mercato interno messicano ha occasionato una rating action da parte di Moody's che propongo perché fa nuovamente il punto sulla situazione dell'emittente, che appare critica in prospettiva proprio perché si rende necessario incrementare il capex per sostenere la produzione in una fase in cui i prezzi del petrolio riducono le disponibilità finanziarie ed al contempo il settore petrolifero messicano rimane chiuso all'investimento privato, che peraltro sarebbe utile a generare maggiori efficienza in termini di redditività del capitale investito.

In positivo restano le attese di supporto governativo da parte del Messico, essendo Pemex società controllata dallo stato.

[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica]Moody's rates certificados bursatiles program of PEMEX[/FONT]
spacer.gif
spacer.gif
spacer.gif

spacer.gif


[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica]New York, April 17, 2009 -- Moody's assigned a Baa1 foreign currency bond rating and Aaa.mx national scale rating on April 3, 2009 to the Mexican Pesos 70 billion certificados bursátiles program of Petróleos Mexicanos (PEMEX). The ratings were also assigned to the initial Pesos 6 billion and Pesos 4 billion issuances (Clave de Pizarra PEMEX 09/09-2) under the program. The outlook for the ratings is stable. [/FONT]

[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica]PEMEX's foreign currency and national scale ratings reflect the company's position as Mexico's largest company and its monopoly status as the country's sole producer of crude oil, natural gas and refined products. PEMEX had a sizable 14.3 billion BOE of proved hydrocarbon reserves (as of January 1, 2009) and oil and gas production in the area of 4.3 million BOE/day in 2008, in line with the largest integrated and national oil companies. It is also a leading crude oil exporter, with over 50% of its total crude production exported to the United States. [/FONT]

[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica]Although PEMEX's debt obligations are not guaranteed by the government of Mexico, our ratings reflect implicit government support, given the company's strategic importance as a generator of tax revenues and foreign exchange, and as a national asset belonging to the people of Mexico. PEMEX's debt obligations and unfunded pension liabilities have declined over the past two years but are likely to increase in a lower price environment in 2009. [/FONT]

[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica]However, PEMEX faces numerous operational and financial challenges. It has not fully replaced production for many years. Production from the giant Cantarell oil field, which contributed over 60% of crude oil production as recently as 2005, declined by almost 25% in 2008 from 2007 levels. Despite ample pre-tax cash flows, a high tax burden has stymied capital retention and investment in reserves and key infrastructure and has resulted in a heavy debt burden. [/FONT]

[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica]Nevertheless, PEMEX has significantly increased its capital spending in the last two years. Capital spending in 2008 totaled approximately $19.4 billion and could be at a similar level in 2009, but it will be a challenging year to meet funding requirements as well as potential debt increases, given the collapse in crude prices and a 2009 capital budget that was initially based on a Mexican crude basket price of $70/bbl. [/FONT]

[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica]Tax reform in 2007 and the passage of energy reform in 2008 indicate that PEMEX's need to retain capital and to reinvest to grow production has gained more widespread recognition across party lines. The energy reform bill provides greater autonomy for PEMEX in setting its budgets, higher retentions of windfall oil revenues for internal investment, and new forms of incentive contracts that would allow foreign companies to enter into projects to develop Mexico's hydrocarbon resources. [/FONT]

[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica]However, the energy reform did not accommodate more far-reaching changes such as production sharing or other forms of equity ownership that would promote accelerated investment in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico, which holds Mexico's best prospects for future reserve and production growth. In addition, most of PEMEX's other operations, such as refining, remain closed to foreign investment or ownership. [/FONT]

[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica]While we see little chance for significant private investment in the Mexican oil sector anytime soon, the recent energy reform indicates reinvestment and production prospects for PEMEX could start to improve.[/FONT]

[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica]We will continue to monitor the implementation of energy and tax reform and their benefits for PEMEX and its investment program. Maintaining the current stable outlook will depend on the company's ability to fund its capital spending and manage future potential leverage increases. A material increase in PEMEX's financial leverage or further significant deterioration in its production profile could affect the company's ratings in the future. [/FONT]

[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica]The last rating action on PEMEX occurred on July 8, 2005, when Moody's announced the impact of its Government-Related Issuers (GRI) methodology on corporate issuers. [/FONT]
 

Imark

Forumer storico
Completiamo il quadro su Pemex con le info riguardanti le aspettative di riduzione della produzione e dell'export petrolifero messicano nel 2009 e nel 2010.

Mexico’s Pemex forecasts daily oil output decline next year

Reuters
RIO DE JANEIRO, (Reuters) -

Oil output at Mexico’s state-owned firm Pemex is expected to fall to about 2.6 million barrels per day in 2010 from an expected 2.7 million bpd in 2009 due to technical disruptions at its main oil field, Chief Operating Officer Raul Livas said in an interview on Thursday.

The expected fall is due to lower production at the giant Cantarell field, he said, adding that output should remain at a relatively stable level going forward.

“We are working on the scenario right now,” Livas told Reuters at the World Economic Forum on Latin America in Rio de Janeiro.

“The decline of Cantarell has some natural reasons and some technical reasons. There was a longer-than-expected disruption due to technical reasons which is being addressed this year,” he added.

Mexico’s finance ministry said earlier this month it expected oil exports to slide by 18 percent in 2010, to 1.125 million bpd from 1.370 million bpd forecast for 2009. Although the ministry did not provide a forecast for overall oil output in 2010, it did say it expected an unspecified decline in oil production next year.

Pemex said last month oil production in February fell to 2.663 million bpd. Company officials say they expect higher production volumes in the second half of the year to offset weaker production from the first half.

The company will keep planned investments unchanged, despite a sharp slump in oil prices over the past year, as Mexico’s government looks to ease the effects of an economic downturn, Livas said. The government forecasts Latin America’s second largest economy will contract 2.8 percent in 2009 because of a slump in demand for Mexican exports.

Oil prices traded at $50.51 a barrel on Thursday, compared with a peak of more than $147 in July 2008, but it is still higher than Pemex’s target for its investments.

“The key aspect is that our investment portfolio has a hurdle rate below the $30 limit (for oil), so we are continuing with all our investment strategy and that is the mandate we are getting from the government to be a factor in helping the economy through the crisis,” Livas said
 

samantaao

Forumer storico
1

aggiornamento
buono spunto degli emittenti meno solidi, credo sia per l'aria primaverile che si respira in borsa che per le nuove emissioni ben accolte dal mercato
prezzi da ICMA (grazie a Mark):
XS0273933902 ICMA CHESAPEAKE 2017
XS0112278303 ICMA ENI 2010
XS0167456267 ICMA ENI 2013
XS0231264275 ICMA MOL 2015
XS0172751355 ICMA REPSOL 2013
XS0287409212 ICMA REPSOL 2017
XS0110487062 ICMA REPSOL 2010
XS0099213547 ICMA STATOIL 2011
XS0267045291 ICMA TOTAL 2011
XS0303256050 ICMA TOTAL 2017
FR0000187080 ICMA TOTAL 10/2010
1240142858immagine1.jpg
 

Allegati

  • OIL-GAS-2009-04-17.zip
    333,9 KB · Visite: 250

Imark

Forumer storico
aggiornamento
buono spunto degli emittenti meno solidi, credo sia per l'aria primaverile che si respira in borsa che per le nuove emissioni ben accolte dal mercato
prezzi da ICMA (grazie a Mark):
XS0273933902 ICMA CHESAPEAKE 2017
XS0112278303 ICMA ENI 2010
XS0167456267 ICMA ENI 2013
XS0231264275 ICMA MOL 2015
XS0172751355 ICMA REPSOL 2013
XS0287409212 ICMA REPSOL 2017
XS0110487062 ICMA REPSOL 2010
XS0099213547 ICMA STATOIL 2011
XS0267045291 ICMA TOTAL 2011
XS0303256050 ICMA TOTAL 2017
FR0000187080 ICMA TOTAL 10/2010
1240142858immagine1.jpg

Certo i rendimenti, anche su scadenze non propriamente cortissime, sono molto contenuti... bisogna muovere su duration modificate significative e su emittenti che esprimono il rischio legato al loro ruolo di "finanziatori" degli stati emergenti che li controllano (Messico, Russia) per spuntare qualche cosina in più...
 

TheLondoner

Forumer storico
caro Mark le quotazioni hanno degli ottimi propulsori nei tassi bassi...da paracadute questi ultimi sono diventati i veri motori dei mercati obbligazionari.
Le rating actions, gli outlook rivisti in negativo, le nuove emissioni a tassi ben più remunerativi .... non scalfiscono proprio il trend...

A guardare i volumi tu che ne dici ?? è il retail che compra o sono gli istituzionali ? Nel primo caso al girar del vento i quei motori potrebbero spegnersi ....
 

Imark

Forumer storico
caro Mark le quotazioni hanno degli ottimi propulsori nei tassi bassi...da paracadute questi ultimi sono diventati i veri motori dei mercati obbligazionari.
Le rating actions, gli outlook rivisti in negativo, le nuove emissioni a tassi ben più remunerativi .... non scalfiscono proprio il trend...

A guardare i volumi tu che ne dici ?? è il retail che compra o sono gli istituzionali ? Nel primo caso al girar del vento i quei motori potrebbero spegnersi ....

Ciao Londinese... vedo che i prezzi sui mercati professionali sono tendenzialmente allineati a quelli dei mercati retail... purtroppo sui volumi su questi ultimi mercati non sono in grado di esprimere valutazioni ...

Sta andando abbastanza bene anche l'HY di fascia alta e non solo dei comparti aciclici, che si muove con l'equity... solo che l'equity c'è da capire dove realmente vuole arrivare... ;)
 

TheLondoner

Forumer storico
Ciao Londinese... vedo che i prezzi sui mercati professionali sono tendenzialmente allineati a quelli dei mercati retail... purtroppo sui volumi su questi ultimi mercati non sono in grado di esprimere valutazioni ...

Sta andando abbastanza bene anche l'HY di fascia alta e non solo dei comparti aciclici, che si muove con l'equity... solo che l'equity c'è da capire dove realmente vuole arrivare... ;)

l'utente :D Lloyd Craig Blankfein credo lo sappia molto bene;)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Alto