Obbligazioni perpetue e subordinate SNS Reeal in diretta: storia di un esproprio - Notizie, informazioni e commenti (13 lettori)

Quante SNS T1 + Lt2 Nominale Sub oggetto del furto avete in portafoglio

  • 10k

    Votes: 19 12,8%
  • 20k

    Votes: 8 5,4%
  • 30k

    Votes: 3 2,0%
  • 50k

    Votes: 39 26,2%
  • 75k

    Votes: 6 4,0%
  • 100k

    Votes: 18 12,1%
  • 150k

    Votes: 17 11,4%
  • 200k

    Votes: 13 8,7%
  • 300k

    Votes: 17 11,4%
  • 500k+

    Votes: 9 6,0%

  • Total voters
    149

claudioborghi

Twitter: @borghi_claudio
In case there are several calculations unleashed what 'fair' would be. "For example, they say the share price on the day before the expropriation of SNS. When the share price was 0.84 cents. That would be the norm."

But there are others which in turn point to a calculation of the assets. "That they get a few billion to be. Then divided"

(...)

But Couwenbergh states that it is not about what is the taxpayer. "The point is that we have a legal system in the Netherlands, which is entitled to protection of property. And as property expropriated, the law says that a fair compensation should be offered.

:up:

Semplice semplice
 

Ilandro

Forumer attivo
Non lo so voi ma questa attesa mi sta distruggendo giorno dopo giorno..
Devi avere fiducia in quello che stanno facendo gli Avvocati è un lavoro meticoloso e professionale che non si ferma alla decisione della Enterprise ma và oltre, ci vorrà del tempo e tu devi pensare positivo.
Savagati rilassati esci con gli amici, fai sport non stare tutto il giorno ad angosciarti.Capito !!!!!!!!!!!:up::up::up:
 

mypa22

Forumer attivo
A proposito dell'essere positivi, se mai la Chamber si dovesse pronunciare a breve........
Che il 25 Aprile sia la nostra Festa della Liberazione (dall'incubo olandese).
 

maxolone

Forumer storico
Dear all,

 

As promised I hereby send you an update on the latest developments (and especially the hearing at the Enterprise Chamber)

 

1.       Hearing at the Enterprise Chamber

 

It was long and cost a lot of energy (two days of hearings from  10.00 a.m.  until resp. 8 and 9 p.m.) but I was satisfied with the way things went). Not only because our lawyers did a superb job but also other lawyers have given their best shot while the lawyers on behalf of the Ministry of Finance appear to be not interested (no proper answers, internal contradictories, lacking or inadequate information)

 

The judges of the Enterprise Chamber were critical as usual but very receptive to our arguments.

 

It would be to much (and to technical) to try to summarize all the arguments in the petitions but generally speaking we have argued that a compensation based on the latest price on the stock exchange seems reasonable (because it contains all relevant and publicly known information) while we argued that the decision of the Dutch State to conmpenate for zero is based on:

 

·         Wrong information

·         Inadequate information

·         Inadequate procedures

·         Wrong assumptions

·         Conspiracy Dutch State with Dutch Central Bank

 

The Enterprice Chamber have stated that they will raise a verdict as soon as possible. Normally it will take a few (up to 6) weeks and then the following alternatives emerge: 

 

A.      The Enterprise Chamber submits a final verdict whereby they:

 

1.       Approves the compensation offered by the Ministry of Finance (compensation remains 0)

2.       Approves our proposal  (compensation equals the last price on the stock exchanges)

3.       Determine a valuation themselves (somewhere between 0 and the latest price on the stock exchange)

 

B.      The Enterprise Chamber submits a preliminary verdict whereby the:

 

1.       Require additional information

2.       Appoint experts

 

I am of course not in a position to adequately assess the most likely outcome but I expect the Enterprise Chamber to raise a preliminary verdict whereby I assume that that they will choose to appoint experts. The experys will conduct an investigation  into all fact and circumstances and based on the gathered evidence propose a compensation to the Enterprise Chamber (and the Judge ultimately will make a final decision).

 

As soon as the breaking news is there I will immediately inform you through an update. 

 

 
 

Cat XL

Shizuka Minamoto
Dear all,



As promised I hereby send you an update on the latest developments (and especially the hearing at the Enterprise Chamber)



1. Hearing at the Enterprise Chamber



It was long and cost a lot of energy (two days of hearings from 10.00 a.m. until resp. 8 and 9 p.m.) but I was satisfied with the way things went). Not only because our lawyers did a superb job but also other lawyers have given their best shot while the lawyers on behalf of the Ministry of Finance appear to be not interested (no proper answers, internal contradictories, lacking or inadequate information)



The judges of the Enterprise Chamber were critical as usual but very receptive to our arguments.



It would be to much (and to technical) to try to summarize all the arguments in the petitions but generally speaking we have argued that a compensation based on the latest price on the stock exchange seems reasonable (because it contains all relevant and publicly known information) while we argued that the decision of the Dutch State to conmpenate for zero is based on:



· Wrong information

· Inadequate information

· Inadequate procedures

· Wrong assumptions

· Conspiracy Dutch State with Dutch Central Bank



The Enterprice Chamber have stated that they will raise a verdict as soon as possible. Normally it will take a few (up to 6) weeks and then the following alternatives emerge:



A. The Enterprise Chamber submits a final verdict whereby they:



1. Approves the compensation offered by the Ministry of Finance (compensation remains 0)

2. Approves our proposal (compensation equals the last price on the stock exchanges)

3. Determine a valuation themselves (somewhere between 0 and the latest price on the stock exchange)



B. The Enterprise Chamber submits a preliminary verdict whereby the:



1. Require additional information

2. Appoint experts



I am of course not in a position to adequately assess the most likely outcome but I expect the Enterprise Chamber to raise a preliminary verdict whereby I assume that that they will choose to appoint experts. The experys will conduct an investigation into all fact and circumstances and based on the gathered evidence propose a compensation to the Enterprise Chamber (and the Judge ultimately will make a final decision).



As soon as the breaking news is there I will immediately inform you through an update.

Chi ha scritto questo?

Grazie
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Alto