Insider trading - Giuseppe ne sai qualcosa?

candido

Nuovo forumer
Sono ben 2 gli articoli oggi apparsi su "Il Sole 24 Ore" in merito all'insider trading accertato dalla Sec nell'affaire Tenaris-Maverick. Quali sono le conseguenze in casi simili?

Riporto alcuni articoli inerenti all'episodio apparsi sul web.

Wednesday June 14, 12:37 pm ET.
Tenaris S.A. will buy Maverick Tube Corp. for $3.18 billion in cash, the companies said late Monday.
Under the merger agreement, Luxembourg-based Tenaris will buy Maverick's 36.9 million shares outstanding as of May 5 for US$65 per share. Maverick (NYSE: MVK - News) finished trading Monday at $45.66 per share. The per share purchase price includes a 42 percent premium to Monday's closing price and a 24 percent premium to Maverick's 90-day average trading price.



SEC Slaps Tube Traders
Tuesday June 20, 4:15 pm ET

Sometimes, the future comes at us very quickly. Such is the case with the funky trading in Maverick Tube (NYSE: MVK) just before it was bought out by Tenaris. As you may recall, an interesting article in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch pointed out that during the three days preceding the announcement, July call options on Maverick with a $60 strike (which were way out of the money at that point) traded more than 1,000 contracts per day. They had traded an average of 100 contracts or so during the prior months.

Can you say insider trading? I knew you could. So, it seems, can government securities regulators.

On Monday, the SEC handed down a civil suit against a group of defendants in Argentina and Uruguay, alleging trading on material non-public information and seeking the usual relief, including disgorgement of the ill-gotten gains.

The complaint, which you can read here (in a PDF) makes for some interesting reading. As I mentioned originally, you can't trade anything these days without leaving a paper trail a mile wide, and the SEC clearly has the details on dozens of funky-looking trades worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.

What are the odds that a Merrill Lynch account in Buenos Aires would get options privileges on May 31 and a few days later trade in Maverick Tube options to such an extent that the purchases would constitute more than 60% of the volume?

Pretty much zero. No one in his right mind would gamble that kind of money on out-of-the-money options with such a small amount of time left before expiration -- unless he knew something.

Unfortunately for those of us who like a good page-turner, the SEC is, so far, short on the details of just how these people got insider information. That will likely be forthcoming. In the meantime, the SEC filed a restraining order to keep the ill-gotten moola from leaving the brokerages.
 
June 19, 2006
SEC Files Insider Trading Suit Over Maverick Tube Option Purchases
As identified in a St. Louis Post-Dispatch article and discussed in an earlier post (here), suspicious trading in Maverick Tube call options right before the company announced it agreed to be taken over at a 30%+ premium has triggered an SEC civil action for insider trading (complaint here). The purchaser is Tenaris S.A., a company headquartered in Luxembourg and controlled by a parent company in Argentina. And, not surprisingly, the trading comes from Argentina, with two sets of purchasers identified by the SEC as trading in Maverick Tube call options and stock during the relevant period. According to the SEC complaint, the two sets of defendants are the Cavalleros of Buenos Aires and the Millers, who list a permanent address of Buenos Aires and apparently reside in Uruguay.

The complaint does not set forth any connection between the various defendants (there are five individuals) and Tenaris, going with the geographic connection and the timing to assert "on information and belief" that they were in possession of material nonpublic information in breach of a duty of trust and confidence. The timing evidence certainly is striking, with each group purchasing large numbers of June 06 out-of-the-money call options less than ten days before they would expire worthless -- a very risky bet, or a sure thing if you know the deal is about to be announced. The defendants also purchased Maverick Tube common stock, transactions that were much less lucrative. On the call option trades, the Cavalleros had a profit of over $850,000 on a $55,000 investment, while the Millers' profits were over $220,000 on an investment of a little less than $20,000. If you annualize those investment gains, they make Warren Buffett look like a minor leaguer.

Typical of insider trading cases involving overseas defendants, the Commission obtained a Temporary Restraining Order and Asset Freeze (order here) to prevent the money from leaving the United States while the Enforcement Division continues its investigation. Each group of defendants traded through the overseas offices of U.S.-based brokerage firms (Merrill Lynch and Wachovia), so the funds were on deposit in this country after the execution of the sale orders at the time the SEC filed suit. The case will now move forward on an expedited discovery basis in which the Commission will try to identify the source of the material nonpublic information, if any. I would expect Tenaris to cooperate in the investigation because it hardly does the company any good to have the SEC angry at it while it tries to complete the purchase of a U.S. corporation whose shares are publicly traded.

As part of the SEC's discovery, the various defendants will be noticed for depositions in the United States, at which they can try to explain why their trading did not involve material nonpublic information. If they were to show up, however, they would likely risk an immediate arrest and criminal insider trading charges. The SEC case is being conducted out of its Chicago office, which means the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Illinois likely would be involved on the criminal side, and somehow I expect U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald's securities/commodities group will be quite aggressive if given the chance. A default judgment in the SEC civil action is a real possibility, leaving over $1 million on the table.
 
9~ < * " 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
/ $ ' a [ (
*I I$;
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
%%*AkC.& #. b;&_ EASTERN DIVISION _ ,,b- ='?fi:' 2." 3i"'~~cimo U ~ ~
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
VS. Case No:
RICARDO CAVALLERO,
ELENA H. DE CAVALLERO,
JUAN CARLOS PERALTA,
SEBASTIAN KOHAN MILLER, and
SILVINA GARCIA TOBAR DE MILLER,
Defendants.
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Commission"), for its Complaint against Ricardo Cavallero, Elena H. Cavallero, Juan
Carlos Peralta (collectively, "Cavallero defendants") and Sebastian Kohan Miller and
Silvia Garcia Tobar De Miller (collectively, "Miller defendants") alleges as follows:
INTRODUCTION
1. This is an insider trading case involving highly profitable and highly
suspicious purchases of call option contracts' and common stock of Maverick Tube Corp.
("Maverick Tube") that were placed through two overseas accounts from at least May 12,
2006 through June 13,2006. These purchases were made in advance of a public
announcement (the "Announcement"), on June 12,2006, that Maverick Tube was to be
1 Each call option gives the holder the right, but not the obligation, to purchase 100 shares, at a
set exercise price, by the expiration date. Thus, a holder of 10,000 call options has the right to
purchase 17000,000shares.
acquired by Tenaris SA ("Tenaris") for approximately $2.6 billion. According to the
Announcement, under the proposed acquisition offer, Maverick Tube shareholders would
receive $65.00 a share, which represents a 36% premium over the ten-day average
closing price of Maverick Tube stock prior to the offer. As a result of the
Announcement, Maverick Tube common stock jumped 37% over its previous day's .
closing price, placing the defendants in a position to gain substantial profits.
2. Upon information and belief, while in possession ogmaterial, nonpublic
information concerning the Announcement, fiom at least May 12 through June 13,2006,
the defendants purchased a total of at least 1120 call options for Maverick Tube's stock.
Moreover, the defendants also purchased at least 7,100 shares of Maverick Tube common
stock shortly before the Announcement. In advance of the Announcement, the
defendants engaged in widespread unlawful activity and are in a position to reap over
$1.1 million dollars in profits.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
3. The Commission brings this action pursuant to the authority conferred
upon it by Section 21(d)(l) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. $78u(d)(l), seeking to
restrain and enjoin permanently the defendant fiom engaging in the acts, practices and
courses of business alleged herein.
4. Venue lies in this Court pursuant to Section 27 of the Exchange Act, 15
U.S.C. $ 78aa. Certain of the acts, practices, transactions and courses of business
alleged herein occurred within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Illinois. All of the subject options transactions took place at the
Chicago Options Exchange, located in Chicago, Illinois.
5. Defendants, directly or indirectly, have made, and are making, use of the
means or instrumentalities of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or the facilities of a
national securities exchange in connection with the transactions, acts, practices and
courses of business alleged herein in the Northern District of Illinois.
6. Defendants, directly or indirectly, engaged in and, unless enjoined, will
continue to engage in transactions, acts, practices, and courses of business that violate
Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"), 15 U.S.C. $
78j(b), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, 17 C.F.R. $ 240.10b-5.
DEFENDANTS
7. Defendants Ricardo Cavallero, Elena H De Cavallero, and Juan Carlos
Peralta reside in Buenos Aires, Argentina. The Cavallero defendants maintain a
brokerage account at a branch office of Merrill Lynch in Buenos Ares. The Cavallero
defendants purchased, or caused to be purchased, call option contracts and common stock
of Maverick Tubes through its brokerage account at Merrill Lynch.
8. Defendants Sebastian Kohan Miller and Silvina Garcia Tobar De Miller
list their permanent address in Buenos Aires, Argentina and their mailing address in
Estes, Uruguay. The Miller defendants maintain a brokerage account at a branch office
of Wachovia Securities, LLC in Buenos Aires.. The Miller defendants purchased, or
caused to be purchased, call option contracts and common stock of Maverick Tube
through its brokerage account at Wachovia Securities.
RELEVANT ENTITIES
9. Maverick Tube is headquartered in Chesterfield, Missouri. Maverick
Tube is a maker of welded steel tube for oil-drilling companies. Maverick Tube's stock
trades on the New York Stock Exchange and its options trade on the Chicago Board of
Options Exchange, the International Securities Exchange, the American Stock and Option
Exchange, the Boston Options Exchange, and the Philadelphia Stock and Options
Exchange.
10. Tenaris is headquartered in Luxembourg. Tenaris is owned by an
international conglomerate located in Argentina and has operations in Buenos Aires,
Argentina. Tenaris is a supplier of seamless oil and gas pipelines. Tenaris' stock trades
on the New York Stock Exchange and its options trade on the Chicago Board Options
Exchange, the International Securities Exchange, the Philadelphia Stock and Options
Exchange and the American Stock and Options Exchange.
FACTS
A. The Cavallero Defendants
1 1. In a joint account, the Cavallero defendants purchased approximately 820
call options between June 1 and June 9,2006. The Cavallero defendants also purchased
6000 shares of Maverick Tube stock on May 12 and June 1,2006.
12. The Cavallero defendants were not authorized to trade options in their
Merrill Lynch account until May 31,2006 and the very next day they began
accumulating Maverick call .options. Indeed, between June 1 and the time of the
Announcement, the Cavallero defendants did not purchase any other options.
4
13. The specific trading activity in this account is as follows:
14. The Cavallero defendants' purchases of Maverick Tube call options
represented a significant portion of the trading in Maverick Tube call options on those
days. For example, on June 1,2006, the Cavallero defendants' purchase of Maverick
Tube call options represented 61.35% of the activity in one series of call options ("Jun
55" call options). On June 2,2006, the Cavallero defendants' purchase constituted
60.60% in another series of call options ("Jul50" call options).
15. Furthermore, the Callavero defendants had purchased on May 2,2006
approximately 5000 shares of ~enariisn their Merrill Lynch account. Thus, the
Cavallero defendants owned a position in Tenaris several weeks in advance of the
Announcement in addition to accumulating positions in Maverick Tubes options within a
week of the Announcement.
16. These call options had June and July expiration dates. These options were
purchased "out of the money" with an exercise price of $50.00 and $55.00, meaning that
at the time of purchase, the market price of Maverick Tube stock was below the exercise
price.
17. The Cavallero defendants bought over 700 out-of-the-money call option
contracts with June '06 expiration dates. For example, on June 6 and 7, they bought 300
Jun-06 55 call options due to expire ten days later. This strike price was $7.00 above the
current market price on that day. Accordingly, the price of Maverick Tube stock would
have to rise significantly by June 17,2006, the date when the options would expire, for
the options to have value. Thus, the Cavallero defendants purchase of call options with
June expiration dates represented a substantial bet that the price of Maverick Tube stock
would appreciate within a matter of days.
18. The total cost of the 820 call options was $55,844.90. As a result of the
Announcement and the resulting increase in the price of Maverick Tube stock, the
Cavallero defendants sold their options and realized a profit of $853,413.01. The
Cavallero defendants' equity positions, which have not been sold, have unrealized gain of
$44,860 as of June 14,2006.
19. On information and belief, at the time the Cavallero defendants purchased
the Maverick Tube call options and stock as set forth above, they were in possession of
material, nonpublic information about Tenaris' proposed acquisition of Maverick Tube.
The Cavallero defendants knew, or were reckless in not knowing, the fact that (a) their
trading was in breach of fiduciary or other duties of trust and confidence that they owed
to the shareholders of Maverick Tube or to the source from which they received the
material nonpublic information; or (b) material nonpublic information about the
acquisition had been communicated to them in.breach of fiduciary or similar duties of
trust and confidence. In the alternative, the Cavellero defendants knew or had reason to
know that the source from which the Cavellero defendants received the material
information breached fiduciary or other duties of trust and confidence by providing the
material information to the Miller defendants.
20. By reason of the foregoing, the Cavallero defendants, directly and
indirectly, violated Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. 5 78j(b)] and Rule lob-
5 thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-51, and are likely to commit such violations in the
hture unless enjoined from doing so.
B. The Miller Defendants
21. In a confidential numbered account at Wachovia Securities, the Miller
defendants purchased both call options and equity positions in Maverick Tube within a
few days of the Announcement. Specifically, the Miller defendants purchased
approximately 300 call options of Maverick Tube on June 9,2006. Furthermore, the
7
Miller defendants also purchased equity positions in both Tenaris and Maverick Tube on
June 7 and June 8,2006.
22. The specific trading activity in this account is as follows:
Maverick
6/9/2006 Buy Tube Option June-06 55C 250 0.25
Maverick
611 312006 Sell Tube Equity 600 62.96
Maverick
611 312006 Sell Tube quit^ 500 62.95
Maverick
- 611 312006 Sell Tube Option June-06 55C 80 7.80
Maverick
611 312006 Sell Tube Option July-06 55C 50 8.10
Maverick
611 312006 Sell Tube Option June-06 55C 18 7.80
Maverick
611 312006 Sell Tube Option June-06 55C 15 7.80
Maverick
611 312006 Sell Tube Option June-06 55C 17 7.80
Maverick
611 312006 Sell Tube Option June-06 55C 30 7.80
Maverick
611 312006 Sell Tube Option June-06 55C 90 7.80
23. As indicated above, the Miller defendants purchased both Tenaris and
Maverick Tube stock and call options within four days of the announcement of a merger
between these two companies.
24. These call options had June '06 and July '06 expiration dates. These
options were purchased "out of the money" with an exercise price of $55.00. For
8
example, on June 9, the Miller defendants purchased 250 June-06 55 call options due to
expire one week later. This strike price was $7.50 over the current market price that day.
Furthermore, the Miller defendants purchased a significant position -250 call options
with a strike date of June 17,2006 -on the last possible trading day before the
Announcement (June 9,2006). These "out of the money" call option purchases
represented a substantial bet that the price of Maverick Tube stock would increase by
more than 20% within a matter of days.
25. In the months prior to the Announcement, the account had purchased stock
in several oil and oil related companies. However, beginning in June, the Miller
defendants engaged in significant sales of their holdings. During the first week of June,
the percentage of the account held in cash went from 19% on May 3 1,2006, to 45% on
June 13,2006, and 51% after the liquidation of Maverick and Tenaris call options. In
addition, the account purchased shares in a contrarian mutual fund that bet on a declining
NASDAQ. These moves reflected a strong indication that the Miller defendants believed
that the market was declining. In contrast, the only equity purchases the account made in
June were in Maverick Tube and Tenaris call options (the account also was buying the
contrarian mutual fund). The Miller defendants had not traded Maverick Tube or Tenaris
securities within the three preceding months
26. On June 13,2006, the Miller defendants liquidated their Maverick Tube
equity and option positions. The Miller defendants' realized profit on their Maverick
Tube call options is approximately $221,122.78. Moreover, their realized profit on their
equity positions in Maverick Tube is approximately $19,435.98.
27. On information and belief, at the time the Miller defendants purchased the
Maverick Tube call options and stock as set forth above, they were in possession of
material, nonpublic information about Tenaris' proposed acquisition of Maverick Tube.
The Miller defendants knew, or were reckless in not knowing, the fact that (a) their
trading was in breach of fiduciary or other duties of trust and confidence that they owed
to the shareholders of Maverick Tube or to the source from which they received the
material nonpublic information; or (b) material nonpublic information about the
acquisition had been communicated to them in breach of fiduciary or similar duties of
trust and confidence. In the alternative, the Miller defendants knew or had reason to
know that the source fkom which the Miller defendants received the material information
breached fiduciary or other duties of trust and confidence by providing the material
information to the Miller defendants.
28. By reason of the foregoing, the Miller defendants, directly and indirectly,
violated Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. tj 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5
thereunder [17 C.F.R. tj 240.10b-51, and are likely to commit such violations in the future
unless enjoined from doing so.
RELIEF REQUESTED
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Commission respectfully requests that this Court issue:
I.
Orders temporarily and preliminarily, and Final Judgments permanently,
restraining and enjoining the Defendants, their agents, servants, employees, attorneys infact,
and all persons in active concert or participation with her who receive actual notice
of the injunction by personal service or otherwise, and each of them, from violating
Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule lob-5 thereunder.
An Order that prevents the Defendants, and each of defendants' financial and
brokerage institutions, agents, servants, employees attorneys-in-fact, and those persons in
active concert or participation with defendants who receive actual notice of such Order
by personal service, facsimile service, service in accordance with such Order, or
otherwise, from withdrawing, transferring, pledging, encumbering, assigning, dissipating,
concealing or otherwise disposing of any common stock or call options for Maverick
Tube Corp. ("Maverick Tube") purchased since May 1,2006, or proceeds from the sale
or exercise of any such call options or common stock since June 1,2006, including, but
not limited to, transactions in (1) an account (Account #168-37376) at Memll Lynch in
the name of Ricardo Cavallero, Elena H De Cavallero, Juan Carlos Peralta and (2) an
account (Account #207-74622; Confidential Account #2424) at Wachovia Securities in
the name of Sebastian Kohan Miller and Silvina Garcia Tobar De Miller
An Order enjoining and restraining the defendants, and any person or entity acting
at their direction or on their behalf, from destroying, altering, concealing, or otherwise
interfering with the access of the Commission to relevant documents, books and records.
IV.
A Final Judgment requiring defendants to disgorge all ill-gotten gains from the
violative conduct alleged in this Complaint, and to pay prejudgment interest thereon.
v.
Ordering defendants to pay civil monetary penalties pursuant to Section 21A of
the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. 5 78u-11; and
VI.
Granting such other relief as this Court may deem just and appropriate.
Dated: June , 2006. Respectfully submitted,
C
"
Gregory von Schaumburg
Jane E. Jarcho
Sunil R. Harjani
Attorneys for Plaintiff United States
Securities and Exchange Commission
175 W. Jackson Boulevard, Suite 900
Chicago, Illinois 60604
Telephone: (3 12) 353-7390
 
Borse in recupero, bene Tenaris grazie ai conti superiori alle attese

04/08/2006 9.20



Le Borse europee scambiano in leggero rialzo questa mattina (a Milano +0,27% il Mibtel e +0,26% l'S&P/Mib) in attesa dei dati sul lavoro negli Usa previsti per le 14.30, ora italiana. Gli investitori sperano che i dati sui nuovi occupati Usa dei settori non agricoli possano dare indicazioni sulla prossima mossa sui tassi della Fed, che terrà la riunione l'8 agosto.

Gli economisti si aspettano di vedere 142.000 nuovi posti di lavoro, in crescita dai 121.000 riportati per giugno. Il tasso di disoccupazione è atteso invece invariato al 4,6%. Per oggi sono attesi nuovi risultati societari tra cui quelli di Unicredit (+0,20% a 6,01 euro), Cremonini (+0,54% a 2,20 euro), Mondo Tv (+1,80%) e Stefanel (-0,27%).

Li ha già rilasciati questa notte Tenaris (+0,76% a 15,63 euro) che ha chiuso il secondo trimestre 2006 con un utile netto in crescita del 45% a 495,8 milioni di dollari, grazie alla forte domanda globale da parte del settore dell'energia, soprattutto in Medio Oriente e in Africa. Il dato è superiore alle attese degli analisti.

Anche i ricavi netti hanno registrato un aumento del 12% a 1.962,3 milioni di dollari, mentre il risultato operativo è salito del 41% a quota 692,8 milioni di dollari rispetto allo stesso trimestre del 2005. Gli investimenti sono aumentati a 99,6 milioni nel trimestre, rispetto a 84,3 milioni di dollari nel secondo trimestre del 2005.

La società ha previsto che nel corso del secondo semestre gli investimenti si attesteranno a livelli superiori rispetto all'anno precedente dato che sarà implementato il programma per aumentare la capacità per i prodotti high-end. In virtù di tali numeri Morgan Stanley questa mattina ha alzato le stime su Tenaris del 6% per l'anno in corso e rispettivamente del 3% e del 2% per il biennio 2007-2008.


"In attesa della conference call, che si terrà oggi, confermiamo la nostra raccomandazione di outperform (farà meglio del mercato, ndr) sul titolo e il target a 19,5 per azione", affermano ad AbaxBank. A favorire l'azione è comunque anche il greggio, rimasto sopra ai 75 dollari per i timori di problemi di approvvigionamento dal Medio Oriente dove proseguono gli scontri nel sud del Libano. Salgono anche Saipem (+0,10%) ed Erg (+0,25%).

In progresso, ma tra le utility, pure Austostrade (+0,54%) che ha acquisito una partecipazione nella polacca Stalexport, pari al 21,7% del capitale per un corrispettivo di 68 milioni di zloty. E' quanto rivela un quotidiano di Varsavia, Puls Biznesu, aggiungendo che Autostrade arriverà fino al 50% di Stalexport entro la metà del 2007.

Buono spunto poi di Aem (+0,65%), Autogrill (+0,74%) e Fiat (+0,50%) dopo che Fitch ha migliorato l'outlook del gruppo torinese a "positivo" da "stabile". Confermati i rating issuer default e quello senior unsecured a "BB-", mentre quello sul breve resta "B". Non particolarmente brillanti le banche e i titoli del risparmio gestito dopo che a luglio è rallentato il deflusso della raccolta di fondi comuni di investimento.

Secondo i dati provvisori comunicati ieri da Assogestioni, il mese scorso la raccolta è stata negativa per 2,8 miliardi da -3,28 miliardi di giugno. Tra i finanziari spicca Ras (+2,13% a 19,83 euro) grazie alla controllante Allianz che ha rivisto al rialzo l'obiettivo di utile netto 2006 tra 5,5 e 6 miliardi di euro dal precedente target di 4,9 miliardi di euro.

La compagnia assicurativa tedesca ha annunciato per il secondo trimestre un utile netto di circa 2,3 miliardi, ben sopra le attese degli analisti che si attestavano attorno a 1,6 miliardi di euro. I ricavi del trimestre sono invece saliti a 24,1 miliardi da 23,7 miliardi di un anno fa. Alla crescita dei risultati del periodo hanno contribuito le buone performance di tutte le aree di business del gruppo.

Sul Midex avanza spedita Telecom Italia Media (+3%), sulle secondo continue ipotesi di cessione, seguita, ma più indietro, da Azimut (+1,80%), Indesit (+1,81%), Impregilo (+0,78%) e Italmobiliare (+1,35%). Soffre invece Pirelli Re, in calo dello 0,51% a 44,62 euro. A seguito dell'approvazione definitiva della legge di conversione del DL n.223/06, Pirelli Re ha previsto per l'intero 2006 una crescita nella parte bassa del range comunicato al mercato, pari ad un tasso composto medio di crescita del 10-15% del risultato operativo comprensivo dei proventi da partecipazioni.

Comunque per il 2007 e il 2008 la società, che ha conseguito nel primo semestre 2006 un risultato operativo comprensivo dei proventi da partecipazioni in crescita del 15%, ha confermato gli obiettivi del piano triennale, tenuto conto del processo di sviluppo avviato con successo nell'Europa Centro-Orientale.

Tuttavia resta la preoccupazione per il clima di incertezza che il repentino cambiamento intervenuto nel quadro normativo ha prodotto tra gli investitori, soprattutto quelli internazionali. Infine è ferma sulla parità Reno De Medici che ha chiuso il semestre con una perdita di 6,3 milioni rispetto a un utile di 0,3 del periodo precedente.

Francesca Gerosa
http://libero.milanofinanza.it/news/dettaglio_news.asp?id=169830&chkAgenzie=TMFI
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Alto