Stai usando un browser molto obsoleto. Puoi incorrere in problemi di visualizzazione di questo e altri siti oltre che in problemi di sicurezza. . Dovresti aggiornarlo oppure usarne uno alternativo, moderno e sicuro.
U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:20-cv-05083-RA
In Re: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Assigned to: Judge Ronnie Abrams
Related Case: 1:20-cv-05823-RA
Case in other court: USBC-SDNY, 08-B-13555(SCC)
Cause: 28:0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Date Filed: 07/02/2020
Date Terminated: 09/30/2021
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 422 Bankruptcy Appeal (801)
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Date Entered # clear Docket Text 06/08/2022 10
12.99MB APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND/OR TO VACATE JUDGMENT, re; 8 Memorandum & Opinion. Document filed by Joseph Waske. (Attachments: # 1 Errata main document, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2)(sc) (Entered: 06/08/2022)
Transfer Agreement FRBP. Transfer Agreement 3001 (e) 2 Transferors: The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited (Claim No. 56669, Amount $500,000.00) To Ng Chung Keung David filed by Jonathan Chi-Shoong Cho on behalf of The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited. (Chi-Shoong Cho, Jonathan)
Debtor 08-13555 Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Transfer Agreement FRBP. Transfer Agreement 3001 (e) 2 Transferors: The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited (Claim No. 56669, Amount $200,000.00) To Chan Kai Chi filed by Jonathan Chi-Shoong Cho on behalf of The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited. (Chi-Shoong Cho, Jonathan)
Debtor 08-13555 Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
PROOF OF SERVICE(Cert. of Service) of Appellant's Motion for Reconsideration & to Vacate Judgment served on, Attn: Kristine Dickson c/o Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. on 6/8/22.
Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Joseph Waske.
In the context of an opposition proceeding, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld a Trademark Trial & Appeal Board (Board) refusal to register a trademark based on likelihood of confusion with a famous but expired mark, notwithstanding the applicant’s assertion of abandonment of the mark by the original registrant. Tiger Lily Ventures Ltd. v. Barclays Capital Inc., Case Nos. 21-1107;- 1228 (Fed. Cir. June 1, 2022) (Lourie, Bryson, Prost, JJ.)
In the context of an opposition proceeding, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld a Trademark Trial & Appeal Board (Board) refusal to...