LEHMAN BROTHERS QUARTO ATTO

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square)

CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:20-cv-05083-RA

In Re: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Assigned to: Judge Ronnie Abrams
Related Case: 1:20-cv-05823-RA
Case in other court: USBC-SDNY, 08-B-13555(SCC)
Cause: 28:0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Date Filed: 07/02/2020
Date Terminated: 09/30/2021
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 422 Bankruptcy Appeal (801)
Jurisdiction: Federal Question

Date Entered # clear Docket Text
06/08/2022 10
12.99MB APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND/OR TO VACATE JUDGMENT, re; 8 Memorandum & Opinion. Document filed by Joseph Waske. (Attachments: # 1 Errata main document, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2)(sc) (Entered: 06/08/2022)
 
Faccio inoltre notare che la volontà del giudice Chapman di ritirarsi il 6 Giugno, a quanto pare, è solo una pia illusione.
 
Docket # 61456

Filed Jun 09 2022

Transfer Agreement FRBP. Transfer Agreement 3001 (e) 2 Transferors: The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited (Claim No. 56669, Amount $500,000.00) To Ng Chung Keung David filed by Jonathan Chi-Shoong Cho on behalf of The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited. (Chi-Shoong Cho, Jonathan)
Debtor 08-13555 Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
 
Docket # 61458

Filed Jun 10 2022

Transfer Agreement FRBP. Transfer Agreement 3001 (e) 2 Transferors: The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited (Claim No. 56669, Amount $200,000.00) To Chan Kai Chi filed by Jonathan Chi-Shoong Cho on behalf of The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited. (Chi-Shoong Cho, Jonathan)
Debtor 08-13555 Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
 
Ad esaurimento le udienze del giudice Chapman.

A breve dovremmo conoscere il nome del nuovo giudice che, dopo Peck e dopo Chapman, condurrà e deciderà la parte finale della vicenda Lehman Brothers.
 
Wednesday, June 08, 2022

PROOF OF SERVICE(Cert. of Service) of Appellant's Motion for Reconsideration & to Vacate Judgment served on, Attn: Kristine Dickson c/o Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. on 6/8/22.


Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Joseph Waske.
 
Drink Up, but Not with Lehman Brand


In the context of an opposition proceeding, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld a Trademark Trial & Appeal Board (Board) refusal to register a trademark based on likelihood of confusion with a famous but expired mark, notwithstanding the applicant’s assertion of abandonment of the mark by the original registrant. Tiger Lily Ventures Ltd. v. Barclays Capital Inc., Case Nos. 21-1107;- 1228 (Fed. Cir. June 1, 2022) (Lourie, Bryson, Prost, JJ.)

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Alto