Marco1974
Nec spe nec metu
Dalla simulazione su Bloomberg da rateo 0
Obbligazioni perpetue e subordinate Tutto quello che avreste sempre voluto sapere sulle obbligazioni perpetue... - Cap. 2 (28 lettori)
- Creatore Discussione caligola2005
- Data di Inizio
- Stato
Dalla simulazione su Bloomberg da rateo 0
Cat XL
Shizuka Minamoto
Originalmente inviato da bosmeld
DEXIA CLF 07/17FLR MTN | Bond | A0NYZB | XS0307581883 | Börse Frankfurt (Frankfurt Stock Exchange)
denaro sui 55 effettivo.
io le tengo
Originalmente inviato da bosmeld
lasciamole maturare
La legge di gravita' non vale per questa. Ma occhio alle mosse della EU nei prossimi giorni...
Wallygo
Forumer storico
HT1 funding De000a0kaaa7
bisognerebbe vedere innanzi tutto il prospetto se prevede il reintegro ...
puoi controllare ?
penso che lo preveda ma non sono sicuro la struttura del titolo non è male tasso fisso fino al 2017 (poi step up e risanamento permettendo se ci fanno il regalo tanto meglio) post call un pò penalizzante anche se agganciato a euribor 12 mesi + 200 b.p.
poi c è ALLIANZ (e scusate se è poco ) da garante sulle cedole è decisamente un titolo da approfondire
bisognerebbe vedere innanzi tutto il prospetto se prevede il reintegro ...
puoi controllare ?
penso che lo preveda ma non sono sicuro la struttura del titolo non è male tasso fisso fino al 2017 (poi step up e risanamento permettendo se ci fanno il regalo tanto meglio) post call un pò penalizzante anche se agganciato a euribor 12 mesi + 200 b.p.
poi c è ALLIANZ (e scusate se è poco ) da garante sulle cedole è decisamente un titolo da approfondire
Ultima modifica:
riccio43
lupo si lupo no
steff
Forumer storico
Ciao Topgun, ma la Haa 122 la stai accomulando o la tradi anche su altri mercati?
bosmeld
Forumer storico
scusa top ma è la xs0209792166?
p.s a chi interessa denario della dexia lt2 833 in chiusura a 58 (io ho mantenuto)
Ultima modifica:
Basel III Start Delayed as Bank Regulators Review Comments
U.S. regulators won’t hold banking companies to a Jan. 1 deadline they wrote into proposed rules for boosting the reserves lenders must hold against potential losses, they said today.
The Federal Reserve, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency “do not expect that any of the proposed rules would become effective” at the start of next year, as they continue weighing views expressed during the comment period, they said in a joint statement.
The agencies are working “as expeditiously as possible” on rules proposed in June to align U.S. banks with standards set by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. The international accords set a Jan. 1 deadline for boosting capital requirements to guard against a repeat of the 2008 credit crisis. Most Basel committee member nations have yet to complete work on the rules.
Today’s statement was a response to concerns expressed by industry participants that they would have insufficient time to understand the rules or make system changes by Jan. 1. The American Bankers Association, Financial Services Roundtable and the Securities Industry & Financial Markets Association have said the rules as proposed could hurt credit availability, damp economic growth and hurt U.S. competitiveness.
“As with any rule, the agencies will take operational and other considerations into account when determining appropriate implementation dates and associated transition periods,” the Fed, FDIC and OCC said in the statement.
The U.S. proposal calls for all banks to maintain “loss- absorbing capital” of at least 7 percent of risk-weighted assets.
‘Drawing Board’
David Stevens, president and chief executive officer of the Mortgage Bankers Association, called the delay a positive development that may signal regulators “are going back to the drawing board.”
“It is critical now that regulators re-propose Basel implementation rules that more appropriately allocate risk- weights on real estate-related assets,” Stevens said in a statement. “Otherwise, credit for real estate transactions will tighten and consumer and borrower costs will go up, as banks reduce their real estate lending and mortgage servicing business.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Jesse Hamilton in Washington at [email protected]
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Maura Reynolds at [email protected]
U.S. regulators won’t hold banking companies to a Jan. 1 deadline they wrote into proposed rules for boosting the reserves lenders must hold against potential losses, they said today.
The Federal Reserve, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency “do not expect that any of the proposed rules would become effective” at the start of next year, as they continue weighing views expressed during the comment period, they said in a joint statement.
The agencies are working “as expeditiously as possible” on rules proposed in June to align U.S. banks with standards set by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. The international accords set a Jan. 1 deadline for boosting capital requirements to guard against a repeat of the 2008 credit crisis. Most Basel committee member nations have yet to complete work on the rules.
Today’s statement was a response to concerns expressed by industry participants that they would have insufficient time to understand the rules or make system changes by Jan. 1. The American Bankers Association, Financial Services Roundtable and the Securities Industry & Financial Markets Association have said the rules as proposed could hurt credit availability, damp economic growth and hurt U.S. competitiveness.
“As with any rule, the agencies will take operational and other considerations into account when determining appropriate implementation dates and associated transition periods,” the Fed, FDIC and OCC said in the statement.
The U.S. proposal calls for all banks to maintain “loss- absorbing capital” of at least 7 percent of risk-weighted assets.
‘Drawing Board’
David Stevens, president and chief executive officer of the Mortgage Bankers Association, called the delay a positive development that may signal regulators “are going back to the drawing board.”
“It is critical now that regulators re-propose Basel implementation rules that more appropriately allocate risk- weights on real estate-related assets,” Stevens said in a statement. “Otherwise, credit for real estate transactions will tighten and consumer and borrower costs will go up, as banks reduce their real estate lending and mortgage servicing business.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Jesse Hamilton in Washington at [email protected]
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Maura Reynolds at [email protected]
Puoi pastare il link per favore?
fabriziof
Forumer storico
Topgun1976
Guest
- Stato