cretineide il thread delle caxxate
- Creatore Discussione ConteRosso
- Data di Inizio
)
superb@ffone
Forumer storico
superb@ffone
Forumer storico
ConteRosso
mod sanguinario
Lotta contro il Drago e le Big Pharma
superb@ffone
Forumer storico
superb@ffone
Forumer storico
a323109
Trafficante e Signore Della Guerra
Qualcosa esce
That’s a huge, open-ended question — there are many candidates depending on who you ask, what country, what domain (politics, economy, climate, etc.). I can’t name one definitive biggest lie for everyone, but I can highlight one that seems especially consequential and widely discussed so far in 2025 — and why many people consider it particularly dangerous or damaging. If you want, I can also list a few options and you decide which seems “biggest” in your view.
---
A strong contender: Misleading claims about Project 2025
One of the big controversies has been around what’s called Project 2025, a large playbook crafted by conservative groups (especially the Heritage Foundation) that outlines sweeping policy changes and structural shifts in U.S. federal government institutions.
Some key issues:
Politicians linked to Trump have sometimes denied involvement in it or downplayed it, even though many of those people contributed.
There are claims made in debates that Project 2025 is not something they will implement, or that it’s just a plan and they haven’t read it — yet many argue that the policies being proposed align closely with it.
Because it touches on many areas of governance (judiciary, civil rights, agencies, etc.), misleading people about what it means or whether it will be carried out has big implications.
Many see the misleading statements — denying relevance, denying involvement, or saying “it won’t be implemented” — as especially problematic because they hide what might be real policy intentions from public scrutiny. It makes it hard for people to make informed decisions.
---
If I had to pick what might be the biggest lie in 2025 (at least in U.S. politics), I’d lean toward those false or misleading claims around Project 2025, because they affect many areas of governance and civil rights, with little accountability or clarity.
---
If you want, I can compare that to lies in other domains (e.g. climate misinformation, economic data, etc.) — would you prefer that angle, or do you want to focus on politics?
That’s a huge, open-ended question — there are many candidates depending on who you ask, what country, what domain (politics, economy, climate, etc.). I can’t name one definitive biggest lie for everyone, but I can highlight one that seems especially consequential and widely discussed so far in 2025 — and why many people consider it particularly dangerous or damaging. If you want, I can also list a few options and you decide which seems “biggest” in your view.
---
A strong contender: Misleading claims about Project 2025
One of the big controversies has been around what’s called Project 2025, a large playbook crafted by conservative groups (especially the Heritage Foundation) that outlines sweeping policy changes and structural shifts in U.S. federal government institutions.
Some key issues:
Politicians linked to Trump have sometimes denied involvement in it or downplayed it, even though many of those people contributed.
There are claims made in debates that Project 2025 is not something they will implement, or that it’s just a plan and they haven’t read it — yet many argue that the policies being proposed align closely with it.
Because it touches on many areas of governance (judiciary, civil rights, agencies, etc.), misleading people about what it means or whether it will be carried out has big implications.
Many see the misleading statements — denying relevance, denying involvement, or saying “it won’t be implemented” — as especially problematic because they hide what might be real policy intentions from public scrutiny. It makes it hard for people to make informed decisions.
---
If I had to pick what might be the biggest lie in 2025 (at least in U.S. politics), I’d lean toward those false or misleading claims around Project 2025, because they affect many areas of governance and civil rights, with little accountability or clarity.
---
If you want, I can compare that to lies in other domains (e.g. climate misinformation, economic data, etc.) — would you prefer that angle, or do you want to focus on politics?
