LEHMAN BROTHERS QUARTO ATTO

[duetto]

Comunicazione di cambio indirizzo:

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS OF LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC. AND ITS AFFILIATED DEBTORS

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the corporate headquarters of the Debtors in the above-referenced chapter 11 cases has changed effective as of August 21, 2017.

Any notices to the Debtors shall be served upon the following address:

c/o Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
277 Park Avenue, 46th floor
New York, New York 10172
Attention: Kristine Dickson and Matthew Cantor

http://document.epiq11.com/document/getdocumentbycode/?docId=3160852&projectCode=LBH

 

[duetto]

Curioso: allo stesso indirizzo anche JPMorgan!

Sicuramente casuale.

 

[duetto]

Docket # 56172

Filed Aug 25 2017

Notice to Transferor of Claim other than for Security Pursuant to FED. R. Bankr. P. 3001(e)(2) filed by Lorraine S. McGowen on behalf of ICCREA Banca S.p.A.. (McGowen, Lorraine)
Debtor: 08-13555 Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.

 

[duetto]

Novità anche da Amsterdam per LBT.


LIQUIDATION REPORT

https://www.lehmanbrotherstreasury.com/pdf/english/5th public report 24 August 2017.PDF

E' un aggiornamento dello storico di LBT.

La parte più interessante, dopo aver ragguagliato sulle precedenti distribuzioni, risulta essere la conferma che, dalla settima distribuzione , l'ISIN
IT0006578600 are temporarily withheld due to operational review ( vale a dire, sospese per una review )

Lima ed altri potrebbero essere interessati.

 

[duetto]

Buona Domenica a tutti

 

[duetto]

UK: Lehman Brothers Administration: Court Considers What To Do With The £8 Billion Surplus


29 August 2017

The English Supreme Court has considered various new categories of creditor claims against a company with unlimited liability in administration where, unusually, there was enough money to pay all creditors and a surplus existed.

Lehman Brothers Administration: Court Considers What To Do With The £8 Billion Surplus - Insolvency/Bankruptcy - UK

 

[duetto]

Si può avere fiducia nella parola di un soggetto in ambito legale?

Certamente si, se ci si fida.

Ma, al di la' della fiducia, servono le carte: una quietanza scritta vale più di ogni parola!

Si sa, col tempo le parole volano, le carte scritte rimangono!

 

[duetto]

Tishman, Lehman Pull Out Win In 10-Year Archstone Slog

August 29, 2017

A Colorado federal court has given wins to Tishman Speyer, Lehman Brothers and slew of other defendants involved in the $22 billion leveraged buyout of the Archstone-Smith real estate investment trust, ending a 10-year-long investor suit over one of the biggest real estate deals to come out of the mid-2000s property bubble.

U.S. District Judge William J. Martinez on Friday granted summary judgment to the defendants on each of the six remaining counts in the suit filed by Archstone preferred equity holders.

Tishman, Lehman Pull Out Win In 10-Year Archstone Slog - Law360

 

[duetto]

Weil Defeats $4 Billion Investor Class Action

August 29, 2017


On August 25, 2017, Weil won a complete victory in a $4 billion investor class action when the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado granted summary judgment on every count as to each of the more than 20 defendants, including Lehman Brothers, Tishman-Speyer, Equity Residential, the Archstone-Smith REIT, and indemnifying parties Bank of America and Barclays. This was the last stop before trial, which had already been scheduled. As a result of this decision, the trial has been vacated, and all counts against all defendants have been dismissed.

This decision ends a 10-year litigation saga surrounding one of the largest REIT going private transactions in history – the $22 billion purchase of Archstone by the defendants, which occurred on the eve of the 2008 financial crisis. The litigation covered both the original going private deal, as well as the subsequent $16 billion asset sale by the buyers to Equity Residential (which plaintiffs tried to stop). The plaintiffs were real estate investors that owned special tax preferred equity interests in Archstone. The LBO allegedly blew up their tax benefits, underpaid them in the deal compared to other equity holders, and executed the deal in a manner that violated the governing charter of Archstone, in breach of fiduciary duties, and to the improper benefit of the buyers.

Weil ran all aspects of this litigation leading up to last Friday’s decision. It has included trips to the Seventh and Tenth Circuit Courts of Appeals, proceedings before four federal district court judges, three California State Court judges, a New York Supreme Court judge, and three arbitrations resulting in favorable arbitration decisions that were confirmed by three different courts. The Weil team traveled to depositions, hearings, and arbitrations in twelve states. At one point, it secured victories in two separate TRO hearings in two states over the course of two consecutive days.

The summary judgment decision was based on a massive record including about 80 depositions, one million pages of documents, and evidence provided by accountants, lawyers, and bankers. The Court held that nothing in Archstone’s governing charter or Maryland corporate law restricted Archstone’s authority to structure the merger as it did. In the end, the Court determined that there was “no genuine dispute of material fact that the terms of the 2007 merger were permissible, contrary to Plaintiffs’ position.” The Court also imposed costs on the Plaintiffs.

The Weil team was led by Litigation Department Co-Chair Jonathan Polkes and Securities Litigation partner Caroline Zalka, and included associates Adam Banks, Melanie Conroy, Justin D’Aloia, Ondrej Staviscak-Diaz, Raquel Kellert, Irisa Chen, Lauren Engelmyer, Andrew Cauchi, and Megan Richardson. Critical contributions over the years were made by Greg Silbert, Paul Dutka and Jessie Mishkin. Corporate partners Mike Bond and David Herman, and Tax partner Mark Schwed, were integral members of the team.

Weil Defeats $4 Billion Investor Class Action - Announcements - Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

 

[duetto]

LBT

https://www.lehmanbrotherstreasury.com/pdf/english/Annex I.PDF