NicOx.... in attesa di..... (1 Viewer)

guly

Forumer storico
Per fare il merger, l'azienda Y deve essere convinta che l'oerazione porti anche vantaggi a lei ... e non solo a Nicox.

In questo momento senza la tecnologia convalidata da nemmeno un farmaco in commercio ed una doppia non approvazione del Naproxcinod ... è evidente che probabilmente le offerte hot line ( :rolleyes: :eek: :lol: :titanic: ) che arrivano a Nicox, non saranno particolarmente favorevoli per Nicox stessa.

La cassa si consuma ed i crediti d'imposta sono appetibili ... sempre che ci sia una tecnologia che durante l'annuncio di una fusione, sia gradito al mercato ... diversamente la proposta di fusione tenderà ad avvicinarsi al valore di cassa più qualche spicciolo per i brevetti potenziali ma che mai hanno approdato in qualcosa di approvato e commercializzato ( crediti d'imposta compresi) ...

e' chiaro che chi ha un farmaco approvato o da caommercializzare perte da una posizione di forza che invece nicox non puo'avere.l'unica cosa che ha sono i soldi,ma quelli si reperiscono a mercato in altri modi come fanno tante bio.quindi nicox non potra' imporre nulla ma solo sottostare tanto per sopravvivere.
 

Zohar

Forumer storico
e' chiaro che chi ha un farmaco approvato o da caommercializzare perte da una posizione di forza che invece nicox non puo'avere.l'unica cosa che ha sono i soldi,ma quelli si reperiscono a mercato in altri modi come fanno tante bio.quindi nicox non potra' imporre nulla ma solo sottostare tanto per sopravvivere.

Solo Garufi pensa di essere in una posizione forza ... la sua immaginazione va oltre la realtà, ed è quella che, fino ad oggi, ha portato alla rovina Nicox.
 
Ultima modifica:

guly

Forumer storico
Solo Garufi pensa di essere in una posizione forza ... la sua immaginazione va oltre la realtà, ed è quella che, fino ad oggi, ha portato alla rovina Nicox.

io penso che garufi abbia ben capito i risultati della sua gestione gia' da qualche anno.ricordo in un intervista quando disse che era stanco facendo capire che voleva abbandonare l'incarico.insomma che voleva andare in pensione.speriamo che alla prossima assemblea ce lo mandino senza tentennamenti.ormai non si neanche piu'ne vedere ne sentire.e'l'immagine di un ceo zombie.e come tale e' ora di metterlo in un museo.
 

Zohar

Forumer storico
io penso che garufi abbia ben capito i risultati della sua gestione gia' da qualche anno.ricordo in un intervista quando disse che era stanco facendo capire che voleva abbandonare l'incarico.insomma che voleva andare in pensione.speriamo che alla prossima assemblea ce lo mandino senza tentennamenti.ormai non si neanche piu'ne vedere ne sentire.e'l'immagine di un ceo zombie.e come tale e' ora di metterlo in un museo.

Purtroppo c'è l'elevata possibilità che venga riconfermato per non partecipazione al voto dell'azionariato diffuso.

In questa assemblea si è pure allungato il mandato ...

Ma è logico ... sa bene che con i risultati ottenuti, sulla piazza rischia di essere bruciato ... almeno come PDG.

E allora la seggiolina cerca di tenersela ben stretta ... tra una fuffa e l'altra in "off".
 

guly

Forumer storico
Purtroppo c'è l'elevata possibilità che venga riconfermato per non partecipazione al voto dell'azionariato diffuso.

In questa assemblea si è pure allungato il mandato ...

Ma è logico ... sa bene che con i risultati ottenuti, sulla piazza rischia di essere bruciato ... almeno come PDG.

E allora la seggiolina cerca di tenersela ben stretta ... tra una fuffa e l'altra in "off".

propabilmente cerca di tirare fino al pensionamento.e' solo questo il suo obiettivo.e per sfortuna degli azionisti ha propabilita' di farcela visto che in nicox non c'e' nessun azionista forte.FSI tanto non ha interessi se non quello di far lavorare laboratori di ricerca francesi e non persegue obiettivi di profitto.in pratica nicox ormai e' un ente statale.andra' avanti solo come centro di ricerca.in sostanza i soldi degli azionisti sono a fondo perduto.e' come aver contribuito alla causa della ricerca scientifica.e ironia della sorte neanche possono scaricarseli da proprio reddito personale.
 
Ultima modifica:

tradermen

Forumer storico
Withdrawal of the marketing authorisation application for Beprana (naproxcinod)
On 19 April 2011, NicOx S. A. officially notified the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) that it wishes to withdraw its application for a marketing authorisation for Beprana in adults for the relief of signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis of the knee and hip.
What is Beprana?
Beprana is a medicine that contains the active substance naproxcinod. It was to be available as capsules.
What was Beprana expected to be used for?
Beprana was expected to be used to relieve the signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis (swelling and pain in the joints) of the knee and hip in adults.
How is Beprana expected to work?
The active substance in Beprana, naproxcinod, is converted in the body into the drug naproxen and a chemical that releases nitric oxide.
Naproxen is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). It works by blocking an enzyme called cyclo-oxygenase, which produces prostaglandins, substances that are involved in the inflammation process. By reducing the production of prostaglandins, Beprana is expected to reduce the inflammation and pain seen in osteoarthritis.
Nitric oxide is a vasodilator, a substance that causes the widening of blood vessels. It is expected to counterbalance the effect of Naproxen of increasing blood pressure.
Withdrawal of the marketing authorisation application for Beprana (naproxcinod)
EMA/364651/2011 Page 2/2
What did the company present to support its application?
The effects of Beprana were first tested in experimental models before being studied in humans.
Three main studies in patients were carried out, comparing Beprana with naproxen (another medicine used in osteoarthritis) and placebo (a dummy treatment). Two of the studies involved 1,929 patients with knee osteoarthritis while the third study involved 810 patients with hip osteoarthritis. The main measure of effectiveness was based on how patients rated their pain and disease activity after 13 weeks of treatment.
How far into the evaluation was the application when it was withdrawn?
The application was withdrawn after ‘day 181’. This means that the CHMP had evaluated the documentation provided by the company and formulated a list of questions. After the CHMP had assessed the company’s responses to the last round of questions, there were still some unresolved issues.
What was the recommendation of the CHMP at that time?
Based on the review of the data and the company’s response to the CHMP lists of questions, at the time of the withdrawal, the CHMP had some concerns and was of the provisional opinion that Beprana could not have been approved for the relief of signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis of the knee and hip.
The CHMP noted that while there was evidence showing that Beprana was effective in relieving the signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis of the knee and hip, its benefits were not sufficient to outweigh the identified risks. The Committee had concerns about its effect on blood pressure and the potential risk of toxic effects in the liver.
What were the reasons given by the company for withdrawing the application?
The letter from the company notifying the Agency of the withdrawal of the application is available under the tab ‘All documents’.
What consequences does this withdrawal have for patients in clinical trials or compassionate use programmes?
The company informed the CHMP that there are no consequences for patients currently included in clinical trials. If you are in a clinical trial or compassionate use programme and need more information about your treatment, contact the doctor who is giving it to you
 

guly

Forumer storico
Withdrawal of the marketing authorisation application for Beprana (naproxcinod)
On 19 April 2011, NicOx S. A. officially notified the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) that it wishes to withdraw its application for a marketing authorisation for Beprana in adults for the relief of signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis of the knee and hip.
What is Beprana?
Beprana is a medicine that contains the active substance naproxcinod. It was to be available as capsules.
What was Beprana expected to be used for?
Beprana was expected to be used to relieve the signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis (swelling and pain in the joints) of the knee and hip in adults.
How is Beprana expected to work?
The active substance in Beprana, naproxcinod, is converted in the body into the drug naproxen and a chemical that releases nitric oxide.
Naproxen is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). It works by blocking an enzyme called cyclo-oxygenase, which produces prostaglandins, substances that are involved in the inflammation process. By reducing the production of prostaglandins, Beprana is expected to reduce the inflammation and pain seen in osteoarthritis.
Nitric oxide is a vasodilator, a substance that causes the widening of blood vessels. It is expected to counterbalance the effect of Naproxen of increasing blood pressure.
Withdrawal of the marketing authorisation application for Beprana (naproxcinod)
EMA/364651/2011 Page 2/2
What did the company present to support its application?
The effects of Beprana were first tested in experimental models before being studied in humans.
Three main studies in patients were carried out, comparing Beprana with naproxen (another medicine used in osteoarthritis) and placebo (a dummy treatment). Two of the studies involved 1,929 patients with knee osteoarthritis while the third study involved 810 patients with hip osteoarthritis. The main measure of effectiveness was based on how patients rated their pain and disease activity after 13 weeks of treatment.
How far into the evaluation was the application when it was withdrawn?
The application was withdrawn after ‘day 181’. This means that the CHMP had evaluated the documentation provided by the company and formulated a list of questions. After the CHMP had assessed the company’s responses to the last round of questions, there were still some unresolved issues.
What was the recommendation of the CHMP at that time?
Based on the review of the data and the company’s response to the CHMP lists of questions, at the time of the withdrawal, the CHMP had some concerns and was of the provisional opinion that Beprana could not have been approved for the relief of signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis of the knee and hip.
The CHMP noted that while there was evidence showing that Beprana was effective in relieving the signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis of the knee and hip, its benefits were not sufficient to outweigh the identified risks. The Committee had concerns about its effect on blood pressure and the potential risk of toxic effects in the liver.
What were the reasons given by the company for withdrawing the application?
The letter from the company notifying the Agency of the withdrawal of the application is available under the tab ‘All documents’.
What consequences does this withdrawal have for patients in clinical trials or compassionate use programmes?
The company informed the CHMP that there are no consequences for patients currently included in clinical trials. If you are in a clinical trial or compassionate use programme and need more information about your treatment, contact the doctor who is giving it to you

cioe' qui si legge che il CHMP ha mantenuto i dubbi su due punti:

1)la perssione arteriosa,rischi?MA NON SI ERA SEMPRE DETTO CHE INVECE IL NAPROXCINOD AVEVA L'EFFETTO DI RIDURLA?E ALLORA CHE DUBBIO HANNO?CHE LA RIDUCE TROPPO?NON MI SEMBRA.OPPURE LA RIDUZIONE,COME MI SEMBRA DI AVER CAPITO,ERA SOLO TEMPORANEA E POI TORNAVA A SALIRE.
2) RISCHI TOSSICITA' FEGATO? MA ALLORA NON HANNO MAI FATTO OSSERVAZIONE DURANTE GLI STUDI SUI VAOLRI EPATICI?SE VI ERANO ALTERAZIONI.IN PRATICA LI HANNO FATTI SOLO A LIVELLO GASTRO.E QUI MI SEMBRA CHE ALLORA SONO STATI UN PO' DILETTANTISTICI O QUANTO MENO SUPERFICIALI.

E COMUNQUE LA FDA AVEVA DEI DUBBI ANCHE A LIVELLO GASTRO MENTRE L'EMEA SEMBREREBBE DI NO.

comunque alla fine si evince che il naprox ormai e' morto e sepolto.di certo qui si dovrebbero riprendere gli studi quasi ada capo per analizzare altri effetti e ormai vista la scadenza dei brevetti non conviene piu'.
IN PRATICA NICOX ORMAI DEVE RICONVERTIRSI E RICOMINCIARE COME SE FOSSE STATA FONDATA IERI.
COXY che fine hai fatto.mi piacerebbe ascoltare un tuo parere sulla situazione.tu che sei tra i piu' illuminati ed esperti sei sparito.anche questo non e' un bel segnale.
 
Ultima modifica:

magolibero

..se la sà gira..
http://www.nicox.com/files/pdf/AG201102baloFR.pdf

27 mai 2011

BULLETIN DES ANNONCES LEGALES OBLIGATOIRES

ASSEMBLÉES D'ACTIONNAIRES ET DE PORTEURS DE
PARTS

NICOX SA

Avis de convocation.
L’assemblée générale des actionnaires réunie le 25 mai 2011 n’ayant pu délibérer valablement faute du quorum requis, les actionnaires sont convoqués
en Assemblée générale ordinaire puis en Assemblée générale extraordinaire sur deuxième convocation le 15 juin 2011 à 10 heures au GRAND HOTEL
MERCURE, 3550, route des Dolines, BP105, 06901 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, à l'effet de délibérer sur le même l’ordre du jour et sur le même projet de
résolutions, tels que publiés au Bulletin des Annonces légales et obligatoires du 13 avril 2011 dans le bulletin n°44.
Tout actionnaire, quel que soit le nombre de ses actions, a le droit de participer aux assemblées générales

..
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Alto