Derivati USA: CME-CBOT-NYMEX-ICE T-Bond-10y-Bund : la maledizione di f4f (vm18)

gipa69 ha scritto:
riporto le righe di zibordi su cobraf.com

ecco cosa pensano di noi alla city.................

il giornalista economico inglese che preferisco riporta oggi alcuni rumors alla City sull'Euro

HSBC Morgan Stanley e un think-tank vicino alla Commissione UE parlano di un Italia a rischio di uscita dall'euro non appena i tassi salgono e c'è la recessione

Notare questo dato: la Germania ha ora un surplus pari quasi all'8% del PIL (non l'export, ma la differenza tra export e import) e per 3/4 lo ha creato negli ultimi anni a spese di Italia e altri paesi entrati nell'euro


---------------------------------------------------
Monday view: Why break-up of faltering euro could be the way ahead
By Ambrose Evans- Pritchard 18/09/2006


The disintegration of the euro may be drawing closer. Warnings of an EMU bust-up were once confined to a handful of eurosceptic journals: they have since spread to City banks such as Morgan Stanley and HSBC, and are now moving perilously close to the EU core itself.

advertisement"Will the Eurozone Crack?" is the latest missive from the Centre for European Reform, a pro-euro think-tank with close ties to the European Commission.

"The single currency was supposed to bring Europe together, but it risks becoming a source of economic dislocation and political division," begins the report, a 59-page demolition of EMU by the centre's business chief, Simon Tilford.

"Italy is the country most likely to trigger a crisis. It is not far-fetched to imagine a scenario in which the country is forced to quit the single currency. It could easily force other members to quit the eurozone and could even precipitate the unravelling of the single market," the paper says.

Those of us who have been thundering ever since Maastricht that EMU is a woefully misconceived idea that will destroy the very Europe it was intended to cement, can only say: welcome to the club. In truth, it is a well-kept Brussels secret that many of the EU's own experts fear the euro will blow apart in the next nasty recession, with Italy, Portugal, Greece, and Spain shaping up as prime candidates for ejection.

As The Daily Telegraph's Brussels correspondent, I used to meet for furtive lunches with a Commission economist who was so worried about the coming smash-up that he had switched his savings into "hard" currencies, choosing foreign accounts beyond EU reach. I joke not. He knew, from his ringside seat, that the single currency had been thrust on Europe by the Delors crowd for entirely political reasons in the face of vehement warnings from the pros at the Directorate of Economic and Monetary Affairs.

"They didn't care if there was a crisis one day. In fact they welcomed it, thinking that it would make it easier for Brussels to gain fiscal powers and create a debt union," he said.

This strategy – the Jean Monnet method – seemed a plausible bet at the time, when the march towards closer union looked unstoppable. They never imagined that France and Holland would spurn the EU Constitution, leaving the euro a stateless, orphan currency without the prospect of political union to back it up. The Centre for European Reform says Italy is now at "five minutes to midnight", running out of options after having squandered the windfall gains of EMU entry.

The country has suffered a 20pc loss in unit labour cost competitiveness against Germany since 1999 – (some say it may be as much as 40pc since 1995) – leaving it trapped in perma-slump, at risk of a debt spiral, unable to devalue back to healthy equilibrium. Germany is the flip side of this twisted coin, relying on wage restraint to "steal a march on its trading partners" in a 1930s beggar-thy-neighbour policy.

Germany's trade surplus reached 7.4pc of GDP in 2005, three fifths at the expense of other euro-zone countries. "It is not sustainable for the biggest economy in the eurozone to rely on such a strategy as it risks a self-defeating cycle of competitive underbidding of wages," it said.

It is a withering indictment of a half-baked currency union, foisted upon incompatible economies with varying sensitivities to interest rates. Yet it shrinks from the obvious conclusion that EMU is inherently poisonous, insisting instead that a euro break-up would be calamitous, and must be prevented. But how is Italy supposed to regain its lost competitiveness, unless by deflating wages year after year? Democracies will not take such punishment, as Winston Churchill discovered in 1926 when his gold policy provoked the General Strike, Britain's closest brush with civil conflict in a century.

Such methods would be doomed to failure in any case, since recession would bring about the surge in public debt most feared. Frankly, the sooner Italy escapes the better. Debt service costs would jump by 3pc or so – according to HSBC – but most of this would flow back to Italian residents who own the bonds, limiting the impact on growth.

Handled well, it could be as liberating as Britain's exit from the ERM in 1992.

Spain is not yet in trouble but will be soon given its current account deficit nearing 10pc of GDP, and a 30pc rise in relative labour costs viz Germany since 1999. The Spanish have revelled in the greatest fiesta since Cortes discovered Aztec gold, primed by real interest rates of minus 1pc-2pc. This level of policy error is unconscionable. The dirty secret of monetary union is that the Club Med bloc have been the victims of an ultra-loose interest rate policy set by the European Central Bank to meet German needs, when Germany was down. Of course their booms ran wild.

There is no sign yet that hedge funds are preparing for the kill. German and Italian debt are still treated as almost identical, with the spread on 10-year bonds remaining wafer-thin at 23 basis points. But the eurozone is not a sacred union. The sovereign nations retain the vast bulk of their reserves, and issue their own debt.

At the end of the day, EMU is no more than a glorified system of fixed exchange rates. We know from past shocks – ERM 1992, Asia 1997 – that such constructs can collapse in days if for any reason the markets start to smell blood.
 
Run the Park ha scritto:
Quale potrebbe essere la correlazione nei due frangenti con i bond ?

Scusa se non ti ho risposto per tempo ma ero impegnato... :(

Fed Leaves Interest Rate at 5.25 Percent
Wednesday September 20, 2:18 pm ET
By Martin Crutsinger, AP Economics Writer
Fed Leaves Interest Rate Steady As Falling Energy Prices Help to Restrain Inflation Pressures


WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Federal Reserve left a key interest rate unchanged on Wednesday as falling energy prices helped to restrain inflation pressures.
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and his colleagues issued a brief announcement saying they would leave the federal funds rate, the interest that banks charge each other, at 5.25 percent.


The decision represents a break for borrowers. It means that banks' prime lending rate, the benchmark for millions of consumer and business loans, will remain at 8.25 percent.

The Fed also had left rates unchanged at their last meeting in August, breaking a record string of 17 rates hikes that had driven the funds rate to its highest level in more than five years.

The decision to leave rates alone for a second time had been widely expected in financial markets, given recent favorable developments on inflation. Oil prices have fallen by more than 20 percent over the past two months and a cooling housing market has contributed to a slowdown in overall growth.

The Fed is trying to engineer a soft-landing for the economy in which growth is slowed enough to keep inflation from getting out of hand without overdoing the credit tightening and raising the chances of a recession.

In its statement, the Fed continued to signal concerns about inflation, repeating a phrase it had used last time -- that the Fed's rate setting panel "judges that some inflation risks remain."
 
hanno votato 10-1 per mantenere i tassi invariati, l'uno era quel pazzo invasato di lacker che voleva rialzare 0,25 :D
spetiamo il T-Bronx al varco , sembra spompato, se chiude sul settle di ieri dovrebbe essere cotto
 
AP
Fed Leaves Interest Rate at 5.25 Percent
Wednesday September 20, 2:27 pm ET
By Martin Crutsinger, AP Economics Writer
Fed Leaves Interest Rate Steady As Falling Energy Prices Help to Restrain Inflation Pressures


WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Federal Reserve left a key interest rate unchanged on Wednesday as falling energy prices helped to restrain inflation pressures.
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and his colleagues issued a brief announcement saying they would leave the federal funds rate, the interest that banks charge each other, at 5.25 percent.


The decision represents a break for borrowers. It means that banks' prime lending rate, the benchmark for millions of consumer and business loans, will remain at 8.25 percent.

The Fed also had left rates unchanged at their last meeting in August, breaking a record string of 17 rates hikes that had driven the funds rate to its highest level in more than five years.

The decision to leave rates alone for a second time had been widely expected in financial markets, given recent favorable developments on inflation. Oil prices have fallen by more than 20 percent over the past two months and a cooling housing market has contributed to a slowdown in overall growth.

The Fed is trying to engineer a soft-landing for the economy in which growth is slowed enough to keep inflation from getting out of hand without overdoing the credit tightening and raising the chances of a recession.

In its statement, the Fed continued to signal concerns about inflation, repeating a phrase it had used last time -- that the Fed's rate setting panel "judges that some inflation risks remain."

The Fed also said -- as it had last time -- that "the extent and timing of any additional firming that may be needed to address these risks will depend on the evolution of the outlook for both inflation and economic growth, as implied by incoming information."

The Fed took note of the slowdown that has occurred in the economy, saying that "economic growth has moderated from its quite strong pace earlier this year" which it attributed to the cooling housing market and the impact of previous Fed rate hikes and higher energy prices.

The funds rate was at a 46-year low of 1 percent and the prime rate stood at 4 percent back in June 2004 when the Fed began a two-year credit campaign to raise rates. The Fed boosted rates a record 17 consecutive times before deciding to pause at the last meeting on Aug. 8.

The decision to keep rates unchanged Wednesday was supported by a 10-1 vote with Jeffrey Lacker, president of the Fed's Richmond regional bank, again casting the lone no vote. Lacker, who also dissented in August, argued again that another quarter-point rate hike was needed to keep inflation in check.


Sembra tutto un pò spompato.... :rolleyes:
e questi continui swing sembrano indicare un prossimo forte movimento direzionale....
 
Ma può essere che non siano precisissimi col rilascio del dato?
ho visto i future scattare con la prima candelona rossa alle 20:14:10 !?






(notare comunque la trappola dello spike all'insù doppio max di giornata della candela delle 20:00 e notare l'attrattore di Fernando (ndx100) che è stato anche questa volta precisissimo, anche se ci ha ballato sopra le candele erano comunque visibilmente influenzate dal livello high)
 
gipa69 ha scritto:
Scusa se non ti ho risposto per tempo ma ero impegnato... :(

Don't worry frate :)

Piuttosto dimmi dove sbaglio; io pensavo, se lasciano i tassi invariati, i bond non dovrebbero salire dato che le nuove emissioni continueranno ad avere tassi in linea con le precedenti?
 
Una cosa mi viene da dire riguardo questa inversione di periodo che attendiamo, se non è oggi quando verrà, che comunque sia credo si possa affermare con buona sicurezza sarà proprio un top, per il semplice fatto che con tutti i movimenti che sta facendo, le trappole sia su che giu ecc non può essere un semplice max relativo in un trend definito
 
Run the Park ha scritto:
Don't worry frate :)

Piuttosto dimmi dove sbaglio; io pensavo, se lasciano i tassi invariati, i bond non dovrebbero salire dato che le nuove emissioni continueranno ad avere tassi in linea con le precedenti?

Intendi i prezzi o i rendimenti?

parlando in generale contano le aspettative future sui tassi e sull'inflazione, i flussi in acquisto, l'offerta della banca centrale e di titoli comparabili, l'andamento intermarket che crea delle correlazioni con l'azionario che comunque possono variare significativamente a seconda della situazione macro in cui ci troviamo, le correlazioni con le commodity che anche in quel caso possono essere molteplici a seconda della situazione macro e le aspettative sui cambi.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Alto