Bund, Tbond of the Hot Hand fine del Capitalismo(vm98)

CNNMoney.com
Bill Miller won't beat the market this year
Monday December 11, 10:56 am ET
By Paul R. La Monica, CNNMoney.com editor at large


Streaks were meant to be broken.
Joe DiMaggio couldn't get a hit in a 57th straight game. The UCLA men's college basketball team finally lost after 88 consecutive wins. And barring a major miracle, Bill Miller's Legg Mason Value Trust mutual fund will not beat the S&P 500 this year, bringing an end to his legendary 15-year streak of outperforming the market.


Through December 8, Miller's fund is up 4.6 percent in 2006 while the S&P 500 has returned, including dividends, 15 percent. Miller's fund has pulled come-from-behind victories in the fourth quarter for the past two years but with only a few weeks left in 2006, it appears that a more than 10 percentage point deficit will be too big to overcome.

Miller will be speaking along with other Legg Mason fund managers at the firm's annual investment outlook in New York City on Monday. He is expected to discuss his fund's performance this year as well as give a market outlook for 2007.

But one reason Miller has lagged the market is a lack of exposure to the energy sector, which has been one of the better performers in 2006 thanks to a rise in oil prices. The S&P energy sector has gained 24 percent this year and makes up about 10 percent of the S&P 500's total market capitalization.

And Miller, despite having the word "value" in his fund's name, is not afraid to invest in stocks with higher growth potential that many conventional value managers would find to be too expensive.

As such, big bets on several Internet companies and health insurers have also not panned out for Miller this year.

A trio of high profile Internet stocks, Amazon.com, eBay and Yahoo!, have all fared poorly this year. Amazon, Miller's ninth largest holding, is down 18 percent. eBay and Yahoo, Miller's 16th and 17th largest holdings, are down 26.5 percent and 33 percent respectively this year.

Miller also owns Google though (it is his seventh largest holding) and that stock has gained 16 percent this year.

Three health insurers have also dragged down the returns of Legg Mason Value Trust this year. Miller owns UnitedHealth, Aetna and HealthNet. United Health, Miller's fifth largest holding, is down 20 percent. Aetna and HealthNet, Miller's tenth largest and 21st largest holdings, have each fallen 10 percent.

Miller tends to make concentrated bets on just a handful of stocks. According to fund research firm Morningstar, Miller only owns 41 stocks in his fund and nearly 45 percent of the fund's assets are invested in his ten largest holdings.

But Miller, who also tends to stick with investments for many years instead of chasing momentum, has had his share of winners this year. In addition to Google, Miller has benefited from investments in utility AES, telecom Qwest and retailer Sears Holding Corporation.

AES, Miller's largest holding, has gained 46 percent this year while Qwest, Miller's third biggest holding, is up 35 percent. Sears, Miller's eighth largest holding, has shot up more than 50 percent.

And even though Miller probably won't beat the market this year, long-term investors have no reason to be upset.

According to Morningstar, Legg Mason Value Trust has had an average annualized return of nearly 12 percent over the past ten years while the S&P 500's average return over the samer period is just 3.8 percent.
 
The Outlook for 2007:
'Reasonably Pleasant'
Strategists See Modest Stock Gains
And Soft Landing for the Economy
December 22, 2006
The consensus outlook for the U.S. stock market in 2007 reads like a Southern California weather report: sunny and mild, with barely a chance of clouds.

In a recent Russell Investment Group survey of 87 money managers, 86% said they expected stocks to rise in 2007, and just 12% said they expected the market to fall. Nearly a third expects stocks to rise 10% or more, while only 1% expects a 10% decline. "Underpinning managers' confidence is a growing conviction the Federal Reserve Board has achieved a soft landing for the U.S. economy," wrote Russell chief portfolio strategist Randy Lert.


Where will stocks end 2007? Has the Fed brought about a Goldilocks economy? Join the discussion.In a much smaller survey of a dozen strategists this week, The Wall Street Journal Online heard that same belief repeated over and over again. So powerful is the sentiment that many of last year's pessimists have capitulated, including Richard Bernstein, Merrill Lynch's famously bearish strategist, who recently forecast an 11% gain in the S&P 500 next year.

But Mr. Bernstein and a few other strategists -- including Goldman Sachs' Abby Joseph Cohen, who describes the market environment as "reasonably pleasant" -- warn that volatility may return to the market next year after a long, blissful period of complacency. That could set the stage for a less-pleasant 2008.

Here, in descending order from the most-bullish to the least-bullish (and you'll notice there's not much difference between the two, unlike last year's survey), is a sampling of strategists' opinions about 2007. All but Citigroup's Tobias Levkovich were interviewed, either by telephone or email. We included Mr. Levkovich because he was part of the survey last year.

After you read their views, share your own.

* * *
Prudential Equity Group
Edward Keon, chief investment strategist
New York

S&P 500-stock index: 1630
Federal funds rate: 5.25%


The stock-market environment Mr. Keon sees when he gazes into his crystal ball is as Goldilocks as it gets: He expects a strong economy in 2007, but not too strong, keeping the Federal Reserve on hold. In fact, he expects the Fed to bring the economy in for a soft landing -- a rare occurrence in recent decades. "They seem to be doing a nice job," he says. He expects decent wage growth, encouraging consumer spending, but not so much that it fuels runaway inflation or hurts corporate profits.

He thinks stock prices, when measured against corporate earnings, are near their historical averages, at roughly 15 times next year's expected earnings, implying that stock-market returns will also be average -- 10% or so.

And he is not bothered much by the fact that most forecasters seem to agree with him -- something a contrarian might see as a sign of excess bullishness. "What matters is not what our opinions are -- it's what people who have money are doing," he says. And so far this year, he says, U.S. investors have, on net, pulled money out of U.S. stocks in favor of money-market funds, bond funds and foreign investments. That means there could be plenty of cash still available to fuel a rally.

* * *
Citigroup
Tobias Levkovich, chief U.S. equities strategist
New York

Dow Jones Industrial Average: 14000
S&P 500: 1600


Though his targets are somewhat lower than Mr. Keon's, Mr. Levkovich is in some ways more bullish. In a recent note, he said his firm's various models -- which mash up investor sentiment, earnings, prices and other factors into various possible scenarios -- had come up with a possible year-end 2007 S&P 500 target as high as 1738.

Mr. Levkovich, whose forecasts for the Dow and S&P were just a bit too low last year, also points out that 2007 will be the third year of President Bush's second term. Historically, stocks have performed better in third years than in any other year of a presidential term, and several strategists expressed some level of belief it could hold true next year.

A falling dollar should also be a boon to big U.S. companies doing business overseas, he believes. Like Ms. Cohen, he expects volatility to return to the market after years of calm, but thinks that could create "a buying opportunity," especially in information-technology shares.

* * *
Oaktree Asset Management
Robert Pavlik, chief investment officer
New York

DJIA: 13533; S&P 500: 1553
10-year Treasury yield: 4.5%
GDP growth: 2% to 3%
Core CPI, year-over-year: 2%
Oil: $55 to $63 a barrel


Mr. Pavlik expects a selloff early in the year as investors take profits from the 2006 rally. "Everybody's very concerned the market is overbought and waiting for a pullback," he says. "It will be a self-fulfilling prophecy."

But later in the year, he thinks, signs of a slowing economy will inspire the Fed to cut rates. Meanwhile, he believes, oil prices will continue to fall, the housing market's bleeding will stop and a recession will be avoided. Corporate profits will slow, but not disappear.

"Once prices get readjusted for that slowdown, the market will be feeling more confident," he says. Among the beneficiaries could be companies that thrive in the late stages of an economic cycle, including industrials. Fed rate cuts, meanwhile, could give banks a lift.

* * *
Goldman Sachs
Abby Joseph Cohen, chief investment strategist
New York

DJIA: 13500; S&P 500: 1550


Ms. Cohen was one of the most prescient forecasters in our survey last year, predicting slowdowns in housing and the economy, but also seeing rallies in the Dow and S&P 500 to 12000 and 1400, respectively.

She describes the economic environment this year as "reasonably pleasant," but her outlook for stocks is "a little less enthusiastic" than it was last year. Economic growth will be slower, stocks are just a smidgen more expensive than a year ago and corporate profits will likely slow down, especially in the energy sector. This need not spell doom for stocks, however. "We believe this deceleration takes pressure off of inflation and interest rates and helps stretch out the economic cycle," she says, "and that's good news for the stock market."

She also thinks the market's current complacency could wane next year, possibly causing investors to shy away from riskier stocks. In this environment, she favors big companies with strong balance sheets and decent dividends. She also expects faster economic growth overseas to give a lift to U.S. exporters.

* * *
Wells Capital Management
James Paulsen, chief investment strategist
Minneapolis

S&P 500: 1550
Federal funds rate: 6%
10-year yield: 6%


Unlike most forecasters in this survey, Mr. Paulsen doesn't see a Goldilocks economy next year. In fact, things will likely get too hot, in his view, with the Fed and bond market "panicking about inflation" by the end of the year.

He expects stocks to "explode" in the first half of the year, with the S&P 500 possibly hitting 1675, driven by excess liquidity, relatively cheap stock valuations, low interest rates, a booming economy and a last-minute rush for stocks by investors who worry about "missing out" on the bull run.

He expects core inflation to rise to more than 3% by the end of the year, well outside the Fed's supposed "comfort zone." He thinks the dollar will keep tumbling, adding to inflation worries. His forecast for interest rates is the same as it was last year: 6% for both the fed funds rate and the 10-year note yield. "Well try this again," he jokes; his forecast was too high for 2006, but he thinks the inflation scare will do the trick in 2007.

* * *
A.G. Edwards & Sons
Stuart Freeman, chief equity strategist
St. Louis

DJIA: 13700; S&P 500: 1550
Nasdaq: 2630
GDP growth: 2.5%


Mr. Freeman believes that, barring any confidence-shaking geopolitical events, stocks could rise even higher than these targets. In fact, he has raised his targets slightly since publishing his last strategy note for the year on Dec. 11.

He expects the economy to slow below its potential growth rate in 2007, but believes that will be music to the ears of an inflation-watching Fed, keeping labor costs and price pressures in check. The Fed could make three quarter-percentage-point interest-rate cuts next year, he thinks, making the stock market happy, as well.

Like most other analysts, Mr. Freeman expects a long string of double-digit earnings growth to come to an end, but without causing stocks to fall. His favorite sectors for early 2007 include energy, consumer staples, industrials and health care -- hardly the stuff of rip-snorting bull markets.

* * *
National City
Tim Swanson, chief investment officer
Cleveland

DJIA: 13500; S&P 500: 1525
10-year yield: 4.75% to 5%


Mr. Swanson's year-end targets for 2006 were nearly dead-on. A year ago, he expected the Fed to stop raising interest rates and high energy prices to fade, and he was right on both counts.

His prediction for 2007 is less benign, including a slowdown in corporate earnings and an overhang of "potential storm clouds." But he thinks stocks are still reasonably priced and set up for a ho-hum year of high-single-digit or 10% growth. "I think the stock market will do OK, but not fabulously well," he says.

He admits that his view is more or less the consensus view, and that makes him nervous. But he is comforted by what seem to be reasonable valuations for stocks. "Unlike the bull market of the 1990s, in which a period of extraordinary optimism was reflected in very high valuations on financial assets, I don't see that today," he says.

* * *
PNC Wealth Management
Jeffrey Kleintop, chief investment strategist
Philadelphia

DJIA: 13400
S&P 500: 1525
Fed funds rate: 4% to 4.5%
10-year yield: 4.6%


Like other forecasters, Mr. Kleintop expects stocks to gain roughly 10% this year as the economy slows. He, too, cites the third year of a presidential term as a potential catalyst for stocks.

His outlook for corporate-profit growth, however, is significantly lower than that of many of his peers -- while others expect high single-digit growth in earnings, he expects earnings to grow just 3%. That's what typically happens after a Fed credit-tightening campaign, according to his research. But he also notes that stocks have typically rallied smartly after the end of Fed campaigns in recent decades, even as profit growth has slowed.

His favorite investment themes include international stocks, rather than U.S. equities, and companies that seem poised for fast profit growth, rather than slower-growing, but modestly priced, companies.

* * *
Standard & Poor's
Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist
New York

S&P 500: 1510
Fed funds rate: 4.5%
GDP growth: 2.3%


Like most of his peers, Mr. Stovall is "embracing the soft-landing scenario," and he thinks the economy will rebound in 2008. He is more sanguine about corporate profits than many strategists, believing they'll get a lift from share buybacks -- which naturally raise the level of earnings per share -- and the falling dollar, which helps the profits of multinationals.

He also thinks stocks are priced too cheaply and says his firm's technical analysts believe the market is due for a small, 5% correction, followed by a 15% to 20% pop. And he takes comfort in history, pointing out that stocks typically rise after the Fed starts cutting rates. Like others, he too has some belief in the presidential-cycle theory.

But he is also a little anxious about the fact that the vast majority of his fellow strategists all have the same rosy forecast for the economy next year, saying inflation poses a real risk to the happy consensus. "Everybody else is saying the same thing" about the economy, he says. "Wouldn't that be a surprise if we all got it right?"

* * *
Briefing.com
Dick Green, chief executive
Chicago

DJIA: 13200; S&P 500: 1510
Fed funds rate: 4.75%
10-year yield: 4.80%


Mr. Green also expects the Fed bringing the economy to a nice, soft landing next year, to the credit of Chairman Ben Bernanke. "I believe [predecessor Alan] Greenspan would have kept tightening and gone too far," he says.

Mr. Green thinks GDP will slow in the first half of the year, but "return to normalcy" by the end of the year. He also thinks inflation will moderate a bit, preventing the Fed from cutting interest rates many times.

"The current widespread optimism is justified," he says, "but some clouds will arise in the second half of the year" -- namely, a slowdown in profit growth to 7% or less, a far cry from the double-digit gains of recent years.

* * *
CyberTrader (Charles Schwab)
Kenneth Tower, chief market strategist
Austin, Texas

DJIA: 13000 to 13500; S&P 500: 1500


Mr. Tower was the most bearish of our forecasters last year, calling for a 23% drop in the Dow to 8250, saying too many investors were bullish and that the bull market that began in October 2002 had gotten long in the tooth. "2006 has been a very surprising year," he admits.

He still believes the current bull market is pushing the outer edge of its life span and that a bear market is due, but now expects that to be a story for late 2007 or early 2008.

"It's a prevalent pattern for bull markets to end with narrow market rallies, and we don't have that right now -- everything but the Nasdaq has been going great guns," he says. "That's why I don't think that we're on the verge of a bear market." But he warns: "This long bull market does not mean the laws of supply and demand have been repealed. Bear markets still exist."

* * *
Ritholtz Research & Analytics
Barry Ritholtz, chief investment officer
New York

DJIA: 13250; S&P 500: 1475
Nasdaq: 2650; Russell 2000: 825
10-year yield: 3.95%


Last year, Mr. Ritholtz semi-famously ended up as far and away the most-bearish of 76 forecasters surveyed by BusinessWeek, calling for a 36% plunge in the Dow by the end of 2006.

That forecast didn't quite work out, but Mr. Ritholtz also expected a "parabolic" rise in the Dow before the crash -- he got that part right, at least. "What we didn't get right was the timing," he says.

Mr. Ritholtz's forecasts for 2007, in contrast, are safely nestled in the bosom of Wall Street consensus. But he still expects a correction in the major indexes, with the Dow dropping 14% by midyear, before rebounding by the end of the year. Markets are "overbought, and as the economy starts to slow, the risk of a correction is out there," he says.
 
Qualcuno mi direbbe quando riaprono ( dopo le feste ) i mercati azionari di

Usa e Giappone ...e...Europa.... ? . . ?



1166882462p1010324.jpg
 
ditropan ha scritto:
... e dopo quest'ultimo aggiornamento ... non mi rimane che augurare a tutta la combricola del fol i miei migliori auguri di buon natale ed a chi non ci si sentirà prima un felice e sereno fine anno e buon inizio per quello nuovo. :)

Auguroni bbanda !!! Immagine sostituita con URL per un solo Quote: http://www.vocinelweb.it/faccine/party/08.gif

Andrea

tanti auguri anche a te ditro! :) :up:

intanto ci godiamo questo bel sole nordico mentre al sud schiattano sotto la pioggia! :D

Ps: ma hai letto il mio mp? :)
 
Quello è il precedente...

Quà si potrebbe sviluppare un lavoro interessante.... :D :V

THE FUTURE WORTH OF A NICKLE
by Mike "Mish" Shedlock

"People who melt pennies or nickels to profit from the jump in metals prices could face jail time and pay thousands of dollars in fines, according to new rules out Thursday," reported USA Today last week.

"Soaring metals prices mean that the value of the metal in pennies and nickels exceeds the face value of the coins. Based on current metals prices, the value of the metal in a nickel is now 6.99 cents, while the penny's metal is worth 1.12 cents, according to the U.S. Mint…

"'The nation needs its coinage for commerce,' U.S. Mint director Ed Moy said in a statement. 'We don't want to see our pennies and nickels melted down so a few individuals can take advantage of the American taxpayer. Replacing these coins would be an enormous cost to taxpayers'…

"Under the new rules, it is illegal to melt pennies and nickels. It is also illegal to export the coins for melting. Travelers may legally carry up to $5 in 1- and 5-cent coins out of the USA or ship $100 of the coins abroad 'for legitimate coinage and numismatic purposes.'"

Note the irony in the mint for being concerned about those who would "take advantage of the American taxpayer," when the actual production cost for each penny is now up to 1.73 cents, according to the Houston Chronicle. Year in and year out, The U.S. Mint wastes money by coining pennies.

Notice that the Mint produced $78,612,000 worth of pennies at a cost of $135,998,760, thereby wasting $57,386,760 of taxpayer money through November 2006. Worse yet are the continued handling charges (and time wasted) by merchants and banks sorting and counting the damn things.

Following is an e-mail conversation I had with John Rubino at Dollarcollapse.com shortly after I wrote "Pennies, Nickels, and Dollars":

Mish: Oddly enough, it is quite likely that The Mint will bring upon the very conditions it hopes to prevent! Telling people 20 nickels are worth 40% more than a dollar can only invite hoarding.

Rubin Exactly! I told my 9-year-old about the nickel thing today (he's home from school with a cold) and he immediately got our change jars out and started picking out the nickels.

The Mint had to be crazy to announce that a nickel is worth 7 cents. I got to thinking about this a bit more, and a nickel is really 0.05 dollars plus a call option on the price of copper and nickel (the metals) in the nickel. If that option is ITM (in the money) enough, the mint cannot prevent people from hoarding them, which will in turn drive up the cost of producing them. In fact, the actual price does not even have to get high enough; the mere expectation that metal prices will get high enough could cause hoarding. Of course, the Mint tried to negate that call option by making it illegal to melt the coins, but that will not stop hoarding if the expected or actual price of copper and nickel gets high enough.

All the Mint really accomplished was telling everyone that a nickel is backed up by something useful, even if a dollar is not. Eventually, this is likely to force the mint to debase the nickel by replacing the copper and nickel in the nickel with steel or aluminum.

Recall that the Mint long ago replaced much of the nickel in nickels with copper, just as it removed the silver in silver dollars and replaced the copper in pennies with zinc. That is actually the process I was referring to when I suggested nickels would soon be confiscated.

In the short term, it is likely the value of a nickel drops to a nickel or less because of the falling price of copper. If there were as much nickel in nickels as there used to be, then nickels would be worth even more than today's copper nickels.

Many of you know that I have been bearish on copper for quite some time. I have been bearish on copper simply because so much of it is used in housing. I expected that symmetrical triangle to break down, and it did. Also note that I was lenient in how I redrew that triangle. The lighter blue line at the base was the lower edge of the previous triangle I was looking at.

We have since then seen a retest of support at the 320 level that seems to have failed, as well as multiple failed tests of the triangle (using previous lines). My target remains the 220 level, but 160-180 is not out of the question. Technically, copper is broken. Can it blast higher anyway? Yes, it can. I just do not think it is likely.

Exactly what are Dr. Copper and Lumber telling us? To me, it is obvious. This economy is in trouble.

Let's now return to my previous question: "In what time frame will the current (and probably soon-to-be confiscated) nickel be worth more than a dollar?"

Aaron Krowne gave a couple of possible answers to that question on AutoDogmatic.com:

"If base metal values continue to increase by 5% per year on average, and the dollar continues to depreciate by about the same, then in about 26½ years, a nickel will be worth a dollar in inherent value. If the rates are 10% per year, then in a bit over 13 years, this milestone will be reached."

Some might think Aaron is asking too much, others too little, and in the short term, I am still calling for a pullback in copper prices. But what's to lose by hoarding nickels? Oddly enough, hoarding nickels is a hedge against both hyperinflation and deflation. If hyperinflation kicks in, a nickel might be worth more than a quarter (in metal content) in no time flat. If deflation kicks in as I suspect, cash will be a good thing to have. If you are going to hold cash (change), it may as well be in nickels.

Regards,

Mike Shedlock ~ "Mish"
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Alto