superbaffone
Guest
non penso sia così banale probabilmente intendono dire che c'è il 400% in + rispetto a zone che non sono vicine alle centrali
Ultima modifica di un moderatore:
centrale nucleare di 2' generazione
- Creatore Discussione big_boom
- Data di Inizio
non penso sia così banale probabilmente intendono dire che c'è il 400% in + rispetto a zone che non sono vicine alle centrali
superbaffone
Guest
Tontolina posta pure quello che vuoi 
superbaffone
Guest
hai cancellato il messaggio in cui dicevi che nel video non c'era rubbia, non avevi neanche visto tutto il video ma volevi assolutamente dare contro a tontolina e hai scritto a casaccio, complimenti.
superbaffone
Guest
c'è grossa crisi
bischer0tt0
mi sono già rotto
il pianeta azzurro... mutazioni... ma andasse a caghèr!
superbaffone
Guest
6/9 mesi per stabilizzare l'impianto........
starless
Forumer attivo
mettiamo la parola fine a questa disinformazione continuata infondata e certamente interessata
Abstract
In 2008, the KiKK study in Germany reported a 1.6-fold increase in solid cancers and a 2.2-fold increase in leukemias among children living within 5 km of all German nuclear power stations. The study has triggered debates as to the cause(s) of these increased cancers. This article reports on the findings of the KiKK study; discusses past and more recent epidemiological studies of leukemias near nuclear installations around the world, and outlines a possible biological mechanism to explain the increased cancers. This suggests that the observed high rates of infant leukemias may be a teratogenic effect from incorporated radionuclides. Doses from environmental emissions from nuclear reactors to embryos and fetuses in pregnant women near nuclear power stations may be larger than suspected. Hematopoietic tissues appear to be considerably more radiosensitive in embryos/fetuses than in newborn babies. Recommendations for advice to local residents and for further research are made.
Environmental Health | Full text | Commentary: Childhood cancer near nuclear power stations
Environmental Health publishes manuscripts on all aspects of environmental and occupational medicine and related studies in toxicology and epidemiology.
Environmental Health is aimed at scientists and practitioners in all areas of environmental science where human health and well-being are involved, either directly or indirectly.Environmental Health is a public health journal serving the public health community and scientists working on matters of public health interest and importance pertaining to the environment.
Editors-in-Chief
Abstract
In 2008, the KiKK study in Germany reported a 1.6-fold increase in solid cancers and a 2.2-fold increase in leukemias among children living within 5 km of all German nuclear power stations. The study has triggered debates as to the cause(s) of these increased cancers. This article reports on the findings of the KiKK study; discusses past and more recent epidemiological studies of leukemias near nuclear installations around the world, and outlines a possible biological mechanism to explain the increased cancers. This suggests that the observed high rates of infant leukemias may be a teratogenic effect from incorporated radionuclides. Doses from environmental emissions from nuclear reactors to embryos and fetuses in pregnant women near nuclear power stations may be larger than suspected. Hematopoietic tissues appear to be considerably more radiosensitive in embryos/fetuses than in newborn babies. Recommendations for advice to local residents and for further research are made.
Environmental Health | Full text | Commentary: Childhood cancer near nuclear power stations
Environmental Health publishes manuscripts on all aspects of environmental and occupational medicine and related studies in toxicology and epidemiology.
Environmental Health is aimed at scientists and practitioners in all areas of environmental science where human health and well-being are involved, either directly or indirectly.Environmental Health is a public health journal serving the public health community and scientists working on matters of public health interest and importance pertaining to the environment.
Editors-in-Chief
- Philippe Grandjean, University of Southern Denmark
- David Ozonoff, Boston University School of Public Health
- Katherine Herz, Harvard School of Public Health
- Francesco Forastiere, Rome Environmental Health Authority
- Neil Pearce, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Ultima modifica:
superbaffone
Guest
bischer0tt0
mi sono già rotto
l'ho già detto altrove, a quanto pare c'è bisogno di ripeterlo
le statistiche vanno in crisi con numeri così piccoli
costruire rapporti causa-effetto con queste "ricerche" E' DISINFORMAZIONE INFONDATA E INTERESSATA
Ultima modifica:
