Macroeconomia Crisi finanziaria e sviluppi

Opulenta america

Il 43% dei pensionati Usa
ha meno di 10.000 dollari



E' quanto emerso dal sondaggio condotto annualmente dall'istituto Employee Benefit Research
 
Columbia Prof Who Called Argentina Crisis: "Corruption Is The Reason Italy Will Be Next"

picture-5.jpg

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 03/09/2010 18:41 -0500


Columbia's Charles Calomiris, who predicted the Argentina sovereign debt crisis (not sure which one: do people actually keep count?) was on Bloomberg TV spreading some more logic, first as pertains to those satanic monsters better known as CDS traders with the following piece of brilliance - "the CDS market always requires two parties in any transaction." This is something that everyone tends to forget. Unlike stocks or cash bonds, where the whole concept of Zero Sum is somewhat murky (especially in naked shorting) in derivatives it is precisely that - one man's loss is another man's gain - no exceptions. Why is nobody scapegoating those traders who enable the speculators to exist? If you raise the CDS offer high enough nobody will buy - we could just as easily blame the CDS sellers for their stupidity and willingness to take on capital losses. But as the whole topic of CDS speculators is pretty much a dead horse at this point. Calomiris also points out another obvious feature of the Greek speculator raid: "the spreads that we saw in Greece at their worst in the CDS market were about 4%. Based on what we know from the history of sovereign crises given the current fundamentals in Greece if anything that is a very muted response in the market. I would have expected a much greater response and I think we will see a much greater response..." Second, Calomiris says that the next country to fall after Greece will be not Spain, but Italy - the reason: massive governmental corruption.
And here is what is the real problem - someone please notify Papandreou.
"This is just a case of shoot the messenger. I think we need to focus on the unsustainable situation that Greece has gotten itself into, with the highest consumption to GDP ration in Europe, one of the lowest labor force participation rates in Europe, one of the highest government social protection rates in Europe, and deficits that have been outsized for several years during the boom, and the of course the fraudulent accounting. I should also note that within the Eurozone, Greece has the worst corruption score according to Transparency International which is a problem because it is telling you is that the institutional quality of the Greek government for reforming itself is very low."
Not surprisingly the next casualty of the rolling crisis (because, to quote Dubya, make no mistake, the crisis will be back very soon) will be not Spain or Portugal, but Italy - another nation using swap gimmickry to enter the Eurozone back in the day.
"The real concern right now should be on Italy. Italy is the country that is most like Greece in this current situation. Highest Debt to GDP ratio, not as high deficits so with smaller changes they can stop the problem. They also, however are very corrupt. They are second to Greece in the level of corruption within the Eurozone."
As a reminder, Italy CDS trade in the low 90s. Evil, hideous speculators - dig in.
Full clip after the jump:
 
Columbia Prof Who Called Argentina Crisis: "Corruption Is The Reason Italy Will Be Next"

picture-5.jpg

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 03/09/2010 18:41 -0500


Columbia's Charles Calomiris, who predicted the Argentina sovereign debt crisis (not sure which one: do people actually keep count?) was on Bloomberg TV spreading some more logic, first as pertains to those satanic monsters better known as CDS traders with the following piece of brilliance - "the CDS market always requires two parties in any transaction." This is something that everyone tends to forget. Unlike stocks or cash bonds, where the whole concept of Zero Sum is somewhat murky (especially in naked shorting) in derivatives it is precisely that - one man's loss is another man's gain - no exceptions. Why is nobody scapegoating those traders who enable the speculators to exist? If you raise the CDS offer high enough nobody will buy - we could just as easily blame the CDS sellers for their stupidity and willingness to take on capital losses. But as the whole topic of CDS speculators is pretty much a dead horse at this point. Calomiris also points out another obvious feature of the Greek speculator raid: "the spreads that we saw in Greece at their worst in the CDS market were about 4%. Based on what we know from the history of sovereign crises given the current fundamentals in Greece if anything that is a very muted response in the market. I would have expected a much greater response and I think we will see a much greater response..." Second, Calomiris says that the next country to fall after Greece will be not Spain, but Italy - the reason: massive governmental corruption.
And here is what is the real problem - someone please notify Papandreou.
"This is just a case of shoot the messenger. I think we need to focus on the unsustainable situation that Greece has gotten itself into, with the highest consumption to GDP ration in Europe, one of the lowest labor force participation rates in Europe, one of the highest government social protection rates in Europe, and deficits that have been outsized for several years during the boom, and the of course the fraudulent accounting. I should also note that within the Eurozone, Greece has the worst corruption score according to Transparency International which is a problem because it is telling you is that the institutional quality of the Greek government for reforming itself is very low."
Not surprisingly the next casualty of the rolling crisis (because, to quote Dubya, make no mistake, the crisis will be back very soon) will be not Spain or Portugal, but Italy - another nation using swap gimmickry to enter the Eurozone back in the day.
"The real concern right now should be on Italy. Italy is the country that is most like Greece in this current situation. Highest Debt to GDP ratio, not as high deficits so with smaller changes they can stop the problem. They also, however are very corrupt. They are second to Greece in the level of corruption within the Eurozone."
As a reminder, Italy CDS trade in the low 90s. Evil, hideous speculators - dig in.
Full clip after the jump:
Corrotti saranno loro, i loro premi Nobel che non valgono la carta su cui sono stampati, il loro governo servo di Wall Street, le loro banche fallite e coinvolte nelle peggiori infamie nel mondo, la loro vergognosa Federal Reserve, la loro CIA che traffica droga e destabilizza i governi degli altri paesi, e il loro esercito che va a rubare il petrolio e ad ammazzare civili.
Si vergognassero dell'aria che li vede.
Ovviamente mi sono trattenuto per rispetto del forum :)
 
Corrotti saranno loro, i loro premi Nobel che non valgono la carta su cui sono stampati, il loro governo servo di Wall Street, le loro banche fallite e coinvolte nelle peggiori infamie nel mondo, la loro vergognosa Federal Reserve, la loro CIA che traffica droga e destabilizza i governi degli altri paesi, e il loro esercito che va a rubare il petrolio e ad ammazzare civili.
Si vergognassero dell'aria che li vede.
Ovviamente mi sono trattenuto per rispetto del forum :)

:up:
 
nel mio caso sfondate un portone spalancato :D


record storico del deficit statunitense a febbraio, quasi 221 miliardi di buco :D
seminando cattiverie su tutti riescono provvisoriamente a contenere gli interessi che pagano ...


As Budget Deficit Hits Record High, Interest On US Public Debt Hits Record Low

picture-5.jpg

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 03/10/2010 15:36 -0500


What is wrong with this picture: the MTS just announced that the February budget deficit was $220.9 billion, after receipts of just $107.5 billion with vastly surpassed by outlays of $328.4 billion. This is a record. Yet the interest on the public debt was a mere $16.9 billion (page 13 of the MTS report). The reason for this is because as TreasuryDirect points out, in February the interest on public marketable debt (actual cash outlays), which as of Monday stood at $8.061 trillion, hit an all time low of 2.548%. How is it possible that unprecedented debt accumulation can result in ever declining interest rates, and Treasury auctions, such as today's 10 Year reopening, in which the Bid To Cover hit an all time high? One answer: The Federal Reserve, which through complete domination of the entire capital market courtesy of ZIRP and QE has now turned market logic upside down by 180 degrees. In a normal world, the more money you borrow, the greater the associated risk, and the greater the interest payments on this debt. Not in America though. So can we assume that the Fed can forever keep rates on debt at record low levels? No. Which begs the question: what happens when interest rates do finally start going up?
Here is the relevant page highlighting the deficit. In a word: the US collects enough money organically (via taxes) to cover less than a third of its outlays.

A look at the distribution of receipt components should lead to questions about the sanity of anyone who claims that the budget trajectory is sustainable - in a word, tax revenues are plunging. Of course, this has to be evaluated in parallel with the observation that tax refunds in January and February of 2010 have actually surpassed those of 2009 as Zero Hedge discussed previously, explaining why consumers have shown abnormal resilience so far in 2010.

So even as the income side of the Federal ledger has rarely if ever been quite as bad, the expenditure side has exploded, and not as a function of debt funding: the bulk of outlays have to do with entitlement programs which came in over $160 billion, and which still could not have been covered organically.
Here is where debt comes in. We know that recently the debt ceiling was raised to $14.3 trillion which is expected to be hit in less than a year. Observant readers will recall that the previous ceiling of $12.4 trillion was supposed to last the US until the end of March - well, not only was this number passed over a week ago, it is now, less than half way into March at $12.5 trillion, which would have broken the debt ceiling far in advance of expectations. This leads us to believe that the $14.3 trillion ceiling will likely have to be raised once again and at a very critical time for the administration: around mid-term election time.
Yet if one were looking just at the interest rate paid by the government on the marketable debt portion of the public debt (which was $8.06 trillion as of most recently), it would appear that America's economy was cranking on all cylinders. Of course, this is not the case, and the rate is merely an indication of the Fed's direct intervention in all possible markets.
The chart below shows the absolute level of the interest on marketable debt, and the MoM % change. In February the rate came in at a record low 2.548%, a 1.8% decline from the 2.595% in March.

To be sure, this is expected with the Fed running a Zero Interest Rate Policy, and QE adding direct purchases by the Fed.
Yet what is notable is that even with the effective Fed Funds rate at zero for over a year, the rate on marketable debt has bottomed out, and the spread from FF to the Interest Rate has held constant at about 2.5%.

The primary reason for this is the duration distribution of US debt. The short-term portion has already reaped the benefits of issuance at or near 0%, while the longer-dated side of the curve is keeping rates higher. If indeed the Treasury is serious about extending the average maturity on public debt from 4 to 6 years, the new baseline for this spread will eventually be at about 3%, where it was earlier in the decade.
Yet the logical next question is what happens when rates start going up? It was as recently as September 2007 that we had a interest rate on marketable debt of nearly 5%. The plunge to 2.5% took just over a year. Even the mere mention of actual tightening will spring rates right back to 5%. What does that mean for actual outlays. Well: if indeed we are correct that total debt will hit $14.3 trillion in less than a year, it means the marketable debt will be about $10 trillion, and the incremental 250 bps of interest will mean about $250 billion of additional interest outlays a year, or half a trillion annually. That comes to about $42 billion a month. In January this amount would have been double the net withheld income taxes.
It becomes obvious why the Fed simply can not allow rates to go up. It has nothing to do with excess liquidity, which of course is a major concern as America goes from one excess-liquidity bubble to another. The problem is that the surging budget, which will need ridiculous amounts of debt for funding, will truly explode if rates were to go up merely to 5%. What happens if rates hit 7.5%... or 10%? At that point it is game over. And that sad ending will occur once the Fed and the administration realize that all ongoing efforts to kick start a consumption driven economy will fail. In the meantime, the economy will slowly grind to a halt as the servicing of public debt takes over a greater and greater portion of all tax receipts, until all taxpayer money is used merely to cover the interest expense. At that point buying CDS on the US denominated in euros, dollars, gold, .556, watermelons, or what have you, will be completely pointless as the bankruptcy of the US will be entirely priced in.
 
le banche statunitensi devono ancora riportare nei loro bilanci quasi 300 miliardi di perdite su crediti
300 miliardi sono l'antipasto, poi verrà il piatto forte :D
in fondo all'articolo c'è il link per scaricare il report di moody's


Moody's Warns Of Pain Ahead For Financials, Profitability Concerns Due To Record Charge-Offs

picture-5.jpg

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 03/10/2010 11:57 -0500


A new report by Moody's "U.S. Bank Asset Quality: Negative Trends Slow Down, But The Pain Isn't Over" has some gloomy observations about the asset quality of the US financial system, and its implications for future charge offs and overall profitability. In estimating total loan charge-offs between 2008 and 2011 Moody's predicts that of the total $536 billion (really $633 billion if unadjusted for purchasing accounting marks), which is equal to 9.7% of all loan outstanding at December 31, 2007, only $240 billion has been charged off, leaving $296 billion still to hit the books. Yet banks have taken loan loss allowances of "only" $188 billion, leaving just over $100 billion unaccounted for. And people wonder why banks are unwilling to lend. Moody's conclusion on what happens as reality catches up with charge offs: "Although banks have provisioned for a substantial amount of their remaining charge-offs, the additional provision required will extend the period that many banks will be unprofitable well into 2010, and will reduce capital levels." Obviously, Moody's estimates do not go past 2011 when many anticipate the next major wave of loan impairments to occur in the form of Option ARM resets and Commercial Real Estate maturities. Furthermore, Moody's does not account for securitized credit card losses, which will also be an area of major pain for the banks in the upcoming years. Just how big the impact of all these will be is still to be determined although it is very likely that the overall impact will impair overall bank capital by well over $100 billion over the next several years.
From the Moody's report:
Moody’s estimates that rated U.S. banks will incur $536 billion of loan losses between 2008 and 2011, equal to 9.7% of loans outstanding at December 31, 2007. We have incorporated this amount into our views of banks’ capital adequacy and into our ratings. This amount has been reduced for the purchase accounting marks taken on residential and commercial mortgage portfolios in recent acquisitions, including JP Morgan’s purchase of Washington Mutual, Wells Fargo’s purchase of Wachovia, Bank of America’s purchases of Countrywide and Merrill Lynch, and PNC’s purchase of National City. On a gross basis (prior to the reduction by the purchase accounting marks), Moody’s loss estimate is $633 billion, or 11.4% of loans outstanding at December 31, 2007. Essentially, we believe charge-offs equal to 1.7% of loans were eliminated through purchase accounting write-downs. Note that these estimates exclude securitized credit cards.

The charts and table below summarize our gross loss estimates in dollar and percentage terms by asset class for all rated U.S. banks (Figures 1 and 2). Each asset class is broken down as follows: charge-offs that have been eliminated through purchase accounting write-downs, 2008 charge-offs, 2009 charge-offs, and the remaining losses that would need to be incurred to reach our full estimate. Rated U.S. banks charged off $88 billion of loans in 2008 and $152 billion in 2009, leaving $296 billion, or 5.3% of loans, to be charged off in 2010 and 2011 to reach our full estimate. Therefore, rated U.S. banks have recognized 45% of our anticipated net charge-offs. On an asset class basis, we believe 42% of residential mortgage losses have been taken versus 30% for CRE.


And despite some minor good news in the trend, the overall patern is still one which should force financial analysts to reevaluate their Strong Buy ratings on most banks:
Although the increase in charge-offs between 2008 and 2009 is substantial, the quarterly charge-off trend moderated at the end of 2009 with aggregate charge-offs actually declining slightly (from $41.3 billion to $40.2 billion) between the third and fourth quarters of 2009. This slow down in net charge-off recognition for rated U.S. banks did not change our forecast of the amount of charge-offs rated U.S. banks will incur, but it has changed our expectations regarding the timing of when these losses will be recognized. Previously, we had anticipated that rated U.S. banks would incur elevated charge-offs through 2010 and return to a more normalized level of charge-offs in 2011. However, we now anticipate that banks will still be grappling with elevated charge-offs through at least the first half of 2011.
The TBTF Big 4 (BofA, Wells, JPM and Citi) comprise the bulk of the charge off risk. The Big have merely gotten Bigger, and now represent an even more concetrated threat to the US economy once true marks are let out of the bag.
Figure 3 summarizes our gross loss estimate in dollar terms for the following bank groups: “Big 4 Banks”, “SCAP Banks – Non Big ”, and “Other Moody’s Rated U.S. Banks” . Our gross loss estimates for the Big 4 Banks, SCAP Banks – Non Big 4, and Other Moody’s Rated U.S. Banks are $447 billion (12.9%), $104 billion (10.4%), and $81 billion (7.5%), respectively. In comparison to our estimate that rated U.S. banks are 45% of the way through their net charge-offs, we believe the Big 4 Banks are 46% of the way through their net charge-offs, while SCAP Banks – Non Big 4 and Other Moody’s Rated U.S. Banks are each 43%.

And here is how many remaining losses at all banks and the Big 4 will still need to be digested.

Full report here.
 
le banche statunitensi devono ancora riportare nei loro bilanci quasi 300 miliardi di perdite su crediti
300 miliardi sono l'antipasto, poi verrà il piatto forte :D
in fondo all'articolo c'è il link per scaricare il report di moody's

Sono passabilmente compiaciuto dal fatto che il motto di un personaggio ammirato da un autorevole rappresentante di questo forum è

la violenza è l'ultimo rifugio degli incapaci

Se gli americani -whatever it means- dicessero violentemente peste e corna di tutto e di tutti è per caso possibile che si abbia un problema anche noi Sk? :)
 
stockuccio, a proposito di corruzione e criminali americani, se non la metti tu , la metto io.
La vicenda di Lehman con la complicità della FED nel falsificare la contabilità. :rolleyes:

Stunningly, nobody at the SEC was aware of Lehman's Repo 105 program. And guess what: NEITHER DID DICK FULD. This is unbelievable - the criminality reaches to the very top, yet the very top denies all knowledge.
The "Repo 105" Scam: How Lehman Fooled Everyone (Including Allegedly Dick Fuld) And How Other Banks Are Likely Doing This Right Now | zero hedge

Come si può definire un sistema dove la criminalità stessa è il sistema, nelle banche di wall street, nella banca centrale, nel governo americano ?


PS: ah, più sopra dimenticavo la complicità delle agenzie di rating (tutte controllate dagli americani) nella truffa subprime (e ci sono le email intercettate che dimostrano la loro piena consapevolezza che il castello di carte sarebbe crollato)
 
Interessante la tua signature Metatarso. Comunque riporto qui à batons rompus questa notiziola che è tratta dalla sezione economica di un recente numero di Le Monde.
In un altro thread Gaudente mi faceva notare come una delle debolezze del Portogallo fosse da individuare nella elevata detenzione non domestica del debito pubblico di quel paese. Pesci piccoli potremmo tuttavia dire. Per quanto riguarda i pesci più grossi, invece, c'era effettivamente un certo senso di preoccupazione nell'articolista anonimo di Le Monde nel rilevare come, mentre il debito pubblico di Italia e Germania fosse detenuto da investitori non domestici nella misura del 55 e del 48% quello della Francia lo fosse invece per un 67%.
Viene onestamente da chiedersi di che cosa si stia parlando. Tenendo ben fermo che la storia non insegna né può insegnare nulla per come noi stessi la costituiamo, in condizioni di programmatica irripetibilità, ragionando in modo
salottiero per analogia, potremmo anche ricordare che neppure 50 anni fa
si riteneva più accettabile la tesi che la caduta dell'Impero Bizantino fosse
stata determinata dai... Turchi Selgiuchidi. :)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Alto