Obbligazioni societarie GM, Ford, Chrysler: il 3D dell'automotive USA (4 lettori)

yellow

Forumer attivo
The White House is expected to announce this morning that Ford (F), Nissan (NSANY) and Tesla Motors are among the first recipients in a $25B loan program to help automakers retool their factories to produce more fuel-efficient models.

S.A.


:DConfermato l'ossigeno per in futuro andare ad idrogeno:

23.06.09 17:00 - Ford: ottiene da Usa 5,9 mld usd prestiti per stabilimenti

WASHINGTON (MF-DJ)--Ford Motor ricevera' 5,9 miliardi di dollari sotto forma di prestiti messi a punto dal Congresso Usa per aiutare i gruppi dell'auto a ristrutturare i loro stabilimenti per produrre veicoli ad elevata tecnologia.
I prestiti serviranno alla societa' per trasformare gli stabilimenti in Illinois, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri e Ohio e per produrre 13 nuovi modelli meno inquinanti. Nissan Motor ricevera' invece 1,6 miliardi di dollari nell'ambito dello stesso programma. Liv
 

paologorgo

Chapter 11
UPDATE 1-U.S. judge rejects GM bondholder committee request


* U.S. Judge denies request for another official committee
* Objecting bondholders to continue fight -- lawyer
By Emily Chasan
NEW YORK, June 23 (Reuters) - A U.S. bankruptcy judge has denied a request from a small group of General Motors Corp (GMGMQ.PK) bondholders to become an "official committee" in the bankruptcy case.
The group, which calls itself the "Unofficial Committee of Family & Dissident GM Bondholders" and says it represents the interests of some 2,000 individual GM bondholders with about $500 million of GM debt, argued its members were unable to participate in GM's bankruptcy process and were not being represented adequately by GM's official committee of unsecured creditors.
Citing more than a dozen different court decisions, U.S. bankruptcy Judge Robert Gerber rejected the group's request on Tuesday saying he believed the group's interests were adequately represented by GM's 15-member official unsecured creditors' committee, which is unusually large for such a committee.
Judge Gerber also said the unofficial committee would be free to raise objections at GM's sale hearing next week, but the group's arguments did not rise to the "exceptional" circumstance that would merit the appointment of another official committee.
In bankruptcy cases, official committees can have their fees paid for by the bankrupt company rather than having to come up with the money themselves.
The group's lawyer, Michael Richman, of the Patton Boggs law firm, argued that an official committee was necessary because his clients -- many of them retirees and individual families -- had limited means and that the bondholders were a large disparate group.
"Some people think we are insane to be standing in the way of this process, but this is about adequate representation," Richman told the court.
But judge Gerber said additional official committees should only be appointed in extraordinary circumstances because, "history tells us when someone else pays for one's expenses, spending restraint goes out the window."
Richman told reporters after the hearing it was "likely" his clients would continue to object to GM's fast track sale, but he was unsure what they would be able to do given their spending limits. Richman said he was planning to meet the official committee of unsecured creditors to see if they would adopt any of the objections his group has raised.
General Motors, which filed for bankruptcy protection on June 1, is seeking court approval for a government-backed restructuring plan under which the Obama administration would take a 60 percent stake in the newly-formed company made up of GM's most profitable assets. The UAW would have a 17.5 percent stake and the Canadian government would own about 12 percent, while GM bondholders are expected to get about 10 percent.
A court hearing on GM's sale request is scheduled for June 30.


http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idINN238817420090623?rpc=44
 

woolloomooloo

Forumer storico
retirees will shoulder higher copayments for emergency room visits and prescription drugs.

il panico dei 'retirees' è giustificata , dato che:
- per i farmaci sotto brevetto (non quelli generici ) le aziende fissano loro il prezzo , a differenza dell'europa dove l'EMEA nel momento in cui riceve dalla stessa azienda americana richiesta di commercializzare un nuovo farmaco, cerca di contenere il prezzo entro una certa forchetta ( e le aziende americane sono molto inca***te per questo)
 

paologorgo

Chapter 11
GM to Take On Future Product-Liability Claims

By MIKE SPECTOR

General Motors Corp., under pressure from state attorneys general, has agreed to assume legal responsibility for injuries drivers suffer from vehicle defects after the auto maker emerges from bankruptcy protection.
The concession means consumers who are injured in car accidents after GM emerges from Chapter 11 protection will be able to bring product-liability claims against the new government-owned auto maker.
Under GM's original bankruptcy plan, the auto maker planned to leave such liabilities behind after selling its "good" assets to a "New GM" owned by the government. That meant future GM car-accident victims who believed faulty manufacturing caused their injuries would be unable to sue the New GM. Instead, they would have been treated as unsecured creditors, fighting over the remains of GM's old bankruptcy estate.
GM's move to take responsibility for future product-liability claims, outlined in a court filing late Friday evening, represents a partial victory for more than a dozen state attorneys general and several consumer advocacy groups. They had objected to GM's original plan to shed these liabilities, arguing it robbed future car-accident victims of their legal rights because they would have no way of knowing they might be entitled to claims.
GM advisors, members of President Barack Obama's auto task force and the attorneys general engaged in talks over the past several days aimed at addressing concerns over product-liability claims, among other issues. The talks heated up on Friday ahead of GM's Tuesday court date, when it will ask a judge to approve the auto maker's plan to create a new GM by selling its desirable assets to the government.
An administration official told The Wall Street Journal recently that the government had become concerned about murky legal precedent surrounding the issue of future product-liability claims. The official said case law was "unclear and ambiguous on the issue of future product-liability claims" making it sensible "for both sides to settle."
In court papers, GM maintained it was not legally-required to take on the claims, saying "federal-preemption" meant the bankruptcy code overrode state laws governing the rights of car-accident victims to sue the new GM. It also noted that Chrysler Group LLC, which recently emerged from bankruptcy in a deal with Fiat SpA, would not be responsible for such claims after a bankruptcy judge dismissed objections to its plan.
But the auto maker said it agreed to take on future product-liability claims "to alleviate certain concerns that have been raised on behalf of consumers." The auto maker said it would "expressly assume all products liability claims arising from accidents or other discrete incidents arising from the operation of GM vehicles occurring subsequent to [the emergence of New GM], regardless of when the product was purchased."
Car-accident victims with pending lawsuits and those who had won damages against GM before it filed for bankruptcy would still be unable to bring claims against the new GM. They would remain with other unsecured creditors making claims against the "old GM." As GM's old estate winds down, those victims are likely to recover little or nothing.
An ad hoc committee representing GM car-accident victims who have sued the auto maker says there are more than 300 people with personal injury claims exceeding $1.25 billion.
A committee representing GM and Chrysler car-accident victims called GM's move "a positive development for public safety and we commend New GM and the auto task force for acknowledging the loophole in the bankruptcy plan and for beginning to address it."
The committee said new GM should take on claims from victims already hurt from defective GM vehicles. It also said Chrysler should take responsibility for future claims, as well as those with pending lawsuits and successful cases brought against Chrysler before it filed for bankruptcy.
The committee said Chrysler's unwillingness to take on future claims as GM has represented "an unacceptable double standard."
A Chrysler spokeswoman declined to comment. A GM spokesman declined to comment beyond the auto maker's court filing.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124614495545265019.html
 

paologorgo

Chapter 11
NEW YORK (Reuters) - General Motors Corp (Other OTC:GMGMQ.PK - News) is heading to bankruptcy court on Tuesday to seek approval to sell its assets to a "New GM" in a plan to reinvigorate the automaker under U.S. government ownership.
GM is seeking approval for the sale from U.S. bankruptcy Judge Robert Gerber just 30 days after filing for Chapter 11. Under the deal, brokered by the Obama administration's autos task force, the company would sell its assets under Section 363 of the bankruptcy code to a "New GM" and continue to operate its best assets, like Chevrolet and Cadillac, while gaining access to billions in funding from the U.S. Treasury.
GM's old assets would remain behind in bankruptcy court to be liquidated.
The deal faces several objections from bondholders and those concerned about the fate of its dealers, but no competing bidders have emerged as an alternative to the U.S. government's $60 billion financing for GM, including a proposed equity investment of $50 billion that would give the U.S. Treasury a 60 percent ownership stake.
If the sale goes through it would mark the second big win this month for the Obama administration's autos task force, which successfully brokered the sale of Chrysler LLC to a group led by Italy's Fiat SpA (Milan:FIA.MI - News). The U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for that deal to go through on June 9.
"I think it is going even perhaps more smoothly than Chrysler, which is kind of interesting considering how much bigger GM is than Chrysler," said Stephen Lubben, a bankruptcy professor at Seton Hall Law School in New Jersey.
"Chrysler cleared the path for it and they're using pretty much the same strategy," he added.
GM said in court documents that the sale would avoid a "systemic failure" for the U.S. auto industry and that it is the only way to provide "a genuine opportunity for the business to survive and thrive in an economically viable entity."
The company has shut 13 of its U.S. assembly plants for up to 11 weeks as part of a bid to cut production and run down inventory while it seeks approval of the sale in bankruptcy court.
The company plans to shed dealer contracts and has deals to sell brands like Hummer and Saturn that will not be carried over to the new company. It also plans to shed the Pontiac brand and GM said on Monday that it would cut operational ties with a Northern California auto plant it had operated in a joint venture with Toyota Motor Corp (Tokyo:7203.T - News).
UPHILL BATTLE FOR CHALLENGERS
While dozens of objections have been filed in the bankruptcy case, some have already been resolved or withdrawn, and challengers to the deal could face an uphill battle since the same court has already approved the Chrysler sale.
"I think Judge Gonzalez kind of made life easier for Judge Gerber here," Lubben said, citing the New York bankruptcy judge who approved Chrysler's sale and the several higher courts that backed his decision.
"People basically know the Second Circuit has already largely blessed this structure," he added.
GM has said more than 50 percent of its bondholders support the deal and also argued that the sale would maximize recovery for its stakeholders. Under the plan, the U.S. government would take a 60 percent stake in the newly formed company, the United Auto Workers union would have a 17.5 percent stake, the Canadian government would own about 12 percent, and GM bondholders are expected to get about 10 percent.
A group of small bondholders, which calls itself the "Unofficial Committee of Family & Dissident GM Bondholders," have said they do expect to mount a challenge to the sale. They filed court papers last week saying they may seek to call GM CEO Fritz Henderson and Harry Wilson of the U.S. Auto Task Force to take the stand as witnesses as they mount their case.
While Judge Gerber has said the group is free to make its case in court, last week he rejected its request to become an "official committee," blocking the group's attempt to gain more funding to mount a legal battle.
Several other individual bondholders -- some representing themselves -- have filed objections to the sale, along with the State of Texas which is claiming that the sale illegally challenges state laws on dealerships, and a group representing about 300 Americans with lawsuits against GM for alleged product defects.
GM, however, resolved a key objection from nine state attorneys general over the weekend, saying in court papers that the "New GM" would accept liability for future product defects. The company also said it would address objections raised by over 20 of its parts suppliers.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Bankruptcy-court-to-rule-on-rb-1704984221.html?x=0&.v=5
 

Yunus80

Del PIG non si butta nulla
ma perchè non scrivete in italiano in modo che sia comprensibile a tutti
leo detti

Qui nessuno è pagato per postare, chi contribuisce al forum lo fa a proprie spese e nel proprio tempo libero.
Se si hanno problemi a capire uno specifico post si può senz'altro chiedere un chiarimento, ma lamentarsi del fatto che un contributo (offerto gratuitamente da un'altra persona) non è presentato impacchettato come lo si vorrebbe, mi sembra quanto meno puerile :rolleyes:
Detto questo, l'inglese è la lingua della finanza, e ancor di più lo è nel momento in cui si vogliono seguire emittenti straniere. Per cui, molto meglio capirne almeno qualcosa... o in alternativa, girare al largo da ciò che non si capisce ;)
 

paologorgo

Chapter 11
perfino alla GM sono stupiti nel vedere i prezzi cui trattano le loro azioni, e, nonostante tutti i problemi che hanno, trovano il tempo di ricordare pubblicamente che non valgono nulla...

GM Statement re: GM stock price and volume
GM management has noticed the continuing high trading volume in GM’s common stock at prices in excess of $1. GM management continues to remind investors of its strong belief that there will be no value for the common stockholders in the bankruptcy liquidation process, even under the most optimistic of scenarios. Stockholders of a company in chapter 11 generally receive value only if all claims of the company’s secured and unsecured creditors are fully satisfied. In this case, GM management strongly believes all such claims will not be fully satisfied, leading to its conclusion that GM common stock will have no value.

http://secfilings.nasdaq.com/filingFrameset.asp?FileName=0001193125-09-142721.txt&FilePath=\2009\07\01\&CoName=GENERAL+MOTORS+CORP&FormType=8-K&RcvdDate=7%2F1%2F2009&pdf=
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Alto