portfolioafterlife
too fast for love
Four Dutch researchers analysed the performance of more than a thousand Luxembourg- and Ireland-based equity and fixed-income UCITs (as mutual funds are known in Europe) between 2008 and 2020. Before costs, the active funds they looked slightly outperformed the passive funds. But, when fees and charges were factored in, the active funds underperformed the passive ones significantly.
In other words, actively managed UCITs are effectively priced to fail. If they reduced their fees, there COULD be a case for using them.
The problem is, of course, that fund management companies make such huge profits from active funds — especially in the retail space — that most of them just aren’t prepared to take that hit.
While the evidence does find that on average actively managed funds have stock selection skills, retail investors don’t benefit from those skills because the implementation costs exceed the alpha-generating ability. Thus, the winners in that game are the fund sponsors. The evidence is even stronger that active management is a loser’s game for fixed income investors.

Actively managed UCITs are effectively priced to fail, study shows | TEBI
Robin writes: There’s nothing wrong with active fund management in principle; the problem is, it’s just too expensive, as Larry Swedroe’s latest article explains. Four Dutch researchers analysed the performance of more than a thousand Luxembourg- and Ireland-based equity and fixed-income UCITs...

Fund Selection: Sense and Sensibility
Simple fund-selection rules can help identify better active managers.
