Obbligazioni societarie Obbligazioni HeidelbergCement AG

In miglioramento il rating S&P, di due livelli, in quanto, per effetto congiunto dell'aumento di capitale (2,2 mld euro) e dei bond emessi (2,5 mld euro) il fardello delle scadenze bancarie da rifinanziare entro il 2011 si riduce sensibilmente...

Outlook positivo, ci sono possibilità che riescano a migliorare leggermente il merito di credito nel corso del 2009 e nel 2010 e poi, se le cose andassero per il verso giusto, a progredire più decisamente nel 2011.

La famiglia Merckle, per effetto dell'aumento di capitale, scende ad un 24% dell'azionariato, mentre il resto è costituito da flottante.

spacer.gif
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Germany-Based HeidelbergCement Upgraded To 'B+' On Capital Increase And New Bonds; Off CreditWatch; Outlook Positive[/FONT]

-- German heavy building materials group HeidelbergCement has successfully raised new bonds for a combined €2.5 billion.
-- The group recently completed a €2.2 billion capital increase, thereby reducing the Merckle family's stake to a quarter of its capital.
-- These actions have together reduced the group's 2011 refinancing burden significantly.
-- We are raising the long-term corporate credit rating to 'B+' from 'B-'.
-- The positive outlook reflects our view of potential further rating upside should the group's credit metrics recover from an anticipated trough this year.

PARIS (Standard & Poor's) Oct. 15, 2009--Standard & Poor's Ratings Services said today that it raised its long-term corporate credit rating on German heavy building materials manufacturer HeidelbergCement AG to 'B+' from 'B-' and removed the rating from CreditWatch, where it was placed with positive implications on Sept. 14, 2009. At the same time, the 'B' short-term rating on HeidelbergCement was affirmed. The outlook is positive.

In addition, we raised the issue ratings on the senior unsecured bonds issued by group subsidiaries HeidelbergCement Finance B.V., Hanson Ltd., and Hanson Australia Funding Ltd. to 'B+' from 'CCC+' and removed these ratings from CreditWatch. We also raised the recovery rating on these debt instruments to '3' from '5', indicating our expectation of meaningful (50%-70%) recovery in the event of a payment default.

Furthermore, we assigned an issue rating of 'B+', together with a recovery rating of '3', to HeidelbergCement AG's proposed senior unsecured bonds for €1.0 billion (five-year tenor), €1.0 billion (seven-year tenor), and €0.5 billion (10-year tenor).

These actions follow the recent completion of a capital increase, which has generated €2.2 billion of cash proceeds for HeidelbergCement, as well as the recent issue of €2.5 billion of new bonds aimed at refinancing part of the group's senior bank facilities put in place in June 2009 and due in December 2011.

"We believe that the combined proceeds should substantially improve HeidelbergCement's liquidity through the reduction of the concentration of debt maturities in late 2011," said Standard & Poor's credit analyst Xavier Buffon. "In addition, the debt reduction achieved through the capital increase should somewhat improve the group's key credit metrics."

The capital increase also contributed to the rebalancing of the shareholder structure of the group. The free float now represents up to 76% of the shares, and the previous controlling shareholder, the Merckle family, owns the remainder.

We believe that these steps send positive signals to the capital markets and, other things being equal, increase the chances of the group successfully refinancing its heavy debt load that matures in December 2011.

Moreover, the significant stake in HeidelbergCement formerly held by the Merckle family is now heavily diluted. In our view, this dilution removes an important concern for the group's credit profile, given the historically heavy debt load and recently reported financial difficulties of the family, which had previously been the controlling shareholder.

The ratings on HeidelbergCement reflect our assessment of its aggressive, albeit improving, debt leverage and the very weak end-market conditions, which together translate into weak cash flow metrics that now represent the main constraint to the ratings.

We anticipate somewhat positive discretionary annual cash flows this year and next, and we see a possibly more pronounced recovery in 2011/2012.

In addition, we continue to consider HeidelbergCement's business profile to be credit supportive.

"The positive outlook indicates our view of further potential rating upside in the next 12 months if the group's credit metrics were to recover more rapidly than we currently assume, from a trough that we consider will be reached this year," said Mr. Buffon.

In addition, potential ratings upside could arise if we were to perceive that the risks related to the refinancing of the outstanding secured facilities had reduced further.

The combination of cost savings, stabilization in mature markets, the beneficial impact of the U.S. infrastructure stimulus package, and debt reduction should help increase the group's cash generation next year.

However, at this stage we anticipate only a modest recovery before a possible sharper rebound from 2011 onwards.

Conversely, we could revise the outlook to stable, should the stabilization of the group's ultimate end markets and recovery take longer than we currently anticipate.
 
Questo report di Moody's pure dà molte indicazioni utili...

Moody's assigns a (P)B3 rating to HeidelbergCement's proposed bond issue ; positive outlook

€1.0 billion or more senior unsecured bonds to be issued

Frankfurt, October 12, 2009 -- Moody's has today assigned a provisional (P)B3 rating with LGD5 (81%) to HeidelbergCement's intended bond issue of an unsecured high yield bond. The rating assignment, which is two notches below the B1 corporate family rating (CFR), reflects the subordinated position of this bond vis-à-vis the secured bank debt. At the same time, the B1 corporate family rating with a positive outlook remains unchanged.

HeidelbergCement (HC) has a reasonably diversified geographical footprint with solid market positions, though Moody's notes a relative preponderance of activities in markets which are heavily affected by the economic downturn, such as the US, the UK, and Eastern Europe while the areas which are still holding up to some extent are less represented, such as India and Northern Africa. This profile could lead to overall weaker results than reported by its peers with activities in more positive markets, such as Lafarge or Holcim, despite a successful reduction in the company's cost base. The B1 CFR further reflects the company's high debt load which was put in place with the acquisition of Hanson in 2007 and was recently alleviated by the EUR 2.25 billion rights issue. The proposed bond issue is designed to partially rebalance HeidelbergCement's uneven debt maturity profile, with major debt maturities towards the end of 2011/beginning of 2012. However, there still remains a relatively high amount to be refinanced in two years from now.

The positive outlook continues to incorporate the expectation that (i) HC will in the intermediate term successfully further extend its debt maturity profile, (ii) HC will generate positive free cash flows in the next years which would be applied to debt reduction and (iii) the operating performance in 2010 will improve based on the expectation that volumes and prices remain roughly flat or slightly positive coupled with implemented cost reductions which should lead over time to improved profitability and cash flows generated, and hence further improved leverage ratios.

Moody's would consider an upgrade of HC's ratings if there is sufficient visibility that HC will be able (i) to generate positive free cash flows in 2010 to further repay its debt, (ii) to improve further the debt maturity profile with an extension of debt coming due in 2011 and 2012 with additional measures such as the issuance of bonds, or by the repayment of the debt, and (iii) if the visibility is sufficient to assume that the company's leverage ratios will improve further to levels closer to a debt/EBITDA of 4.0x (per end of June 2009: 5.9x, proforma for the rights issue 4.9x) and RCF/net debt above the mid teens (per end of June 2009: 9.9%, proforma for the rights issue 10.6%) during the course of 2010.

Given the continued weak construction markets in which HC is active, such as the US and the UK, Moody's would also be looking for a better visibility regarding the expected development in these markets.

Moody's has ranked HeidelbergCement's debt, trade payables and pension liabilities into two categories: the secured bank debt as well as the unsecured debt at operating level, the trade payables and pension liabilities are ranking structurally ahead of HC's capital market instruments given their position which is closer to the cash generating entities. The unsecured debt at holding company level ranks behind the secured bank debt and the other liabilities at operating level.

According to HC's loan agreement, 100% of the proceeds of capital market instruments need to be applied to the repayment of the company's syndicated bank facility and therefore reduce the total amount of secured debt in the company's liability structure accordingly.

However, despite the reduction of secured debt, this is not sufficient to lower the notching between the corporate family rating and the bond rating according to Moody's loss given default methodology though further reductions in priority debt associated with the positive migration of the CFR could have a positive impact on the rating of unsecured debt.

The principal methodology used in rating HeidelbergCement was Moody's global building materials methodology, published in July 2009 and available on OpenDNS in the Rating Methodologies sub-directory under the Research & Ratings tab. Other methodologies and factors that may have been considered in the process of rating this issuer can also be found in the Rating Methodologies sub-directory on Moody's website.

Moody's last rating action on HeidelbergCement on 24 September 2009 was to change the outlook of the company's B1 corporate family rating to positive.

HeidelbergCement AG is the world's third-largest cement producer. HC generated sales of EUR5.4 billion in the first six months of fiscal year 2009. With the acquisition of UK building materials producer Hanson plc in mid-2007, HC is now the world's largest producer of aggregates with an annual output in 2007 of 334 mt, and the second-largest producer of ready-mixed concrete with an output of 46 million cubic meters, behind Cemex.
 
nuove emissioni HeidelbergCement AG

vedo due nuove emissioni HeidelbergCement

XS0478802548 6.5% 03/08/2015
XS0478803355 7.5% 03/04/2020

però trovo solo info in tedesco (che mastico poco) e su bondboard vengono indicate come Kundbar (cioè callabili) ma non specificano altro

magari il sempre ottimo Antonio ha qualche notizia in più sull'argomento... :D
 
vedo due nuove emissioni HeidelbergCement

XS0478802548 6.5% 03/08/2015
XS0478803355 7.5% 03/04/2020

però trovo solo info in tedesco (che mastico poco) e su bondboard vengono indicate come Kundbar (cioè callabili) ma non specificano altro

magari il sempre ottimo Antonio ha qualche notizia in più sull'argomento... :D

Hanno preso un ulteriore upgrade da almeno un'agenzia perché stanno facendo una tale scorta di liquidità da ridurre sensibilmente il rischio rifinanziamento sulle scadenze del 2011... in pratica il solito gioco di ripagare le banche con i soldi dei bondholder ... ;)

Si può pure prendere parte alla festa, ma bisognerà essere razzi ad uscire non appena girerà il vento... :lol: :lol:

Secondo me, se si vuole partecipare all'avventura dei temi speculativi nella situazione attuale (priva di cartolarizzazioni dei loans bancari all'HY, e con le banche che stanno uscendo in massa dal segmento, facendosi ripagare anticipatamente i crediti agli emittenti con i soldi raccolti dai bondholders) e senza perdere il sonno la notte, occorrono due requisiti 1) emittente che abbia loans bancari outstanding di pari livello rispetto a quello obbligazionario e con banche che non abbiano fretta di passare alla cassa e salutare; 2) HY determinato da leverage elevato, ma con operazioni di deleverage in corso facilitate da EBITDA margin stabilmente elevati, meglio se operanti in comparti merceologici aciclici e/o in segmenti di comparto difensivi...
 
vedo due nuove emissioni HeidelbergCement

XS0478802548 6.5% 03/08/2015
XS0478803355 7.5% 03/04/2020

però trovo solo info in tedesco (che mastico poco) e su bondboard vengono indicate come Kundbar (cioè callabili) ma non specificano altro

magari il sempre ottimo Antonio ha qualche notizia in più sull'argomento... :D

Non si possono acquistare, in Italia,ora.
 
Hanno preso un ulteriore upgrade da almeno un'agenzia perché stanno facendo una tale scorta di liquidità da ridurre sensibilmente il rischio rifinanziamento sulle scadenze del 2011... in pratica il solito gioco di ripagare le banche con i soldi dei bondholder ... ;)

Si può pure prendere parte alla festa, ma bisognerà essere razzi ad uscire non appena girerà il vento... :lol: :lol:

Secondo me, se si vuole partecipare all'avventura dei temi speculativi nella situazione attuale (priva di cartolarizzazioni dei loans bancari all'HY, e con le banche che stanno uscendo in massa dal segmento, facendosi ripagare anticipatamente i crediti agli emittenti con i soldi raccolti dai bondholders) e senza perdere il sonno la notte, occorrono due requisiti 1) emittente che abbia loans bancari outstanding di pari livello rispetto a quello obbligazionario e con banche che non abbiano fretta di passare alla cassa e salutare; 2) HY determinato da leverage elevato, ma con operazioni di deleverage in corso facilitate da EBITDA margin stabilmente elevati, meglio se operanti in comparti merceologici aciclici e/o in segmenti di comparto difensivi...
:up::up:
 
OTC si trovano, ieri la prima si acquistava a 99.90
diciamo che confrontandole con le altre HeidelbergCement già sul mercato i margini di salita sono abbastanza ridotti

Non investment grade, taglio mille. Le due condizioni,
sommate, impedirebbero l'acquisto, mi risulta. Fosse un taglio da 50K sarebbe diverso.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Alto