oldmouseit
Forumer storico
inviata anche io
I'm sorry for my english.
I have invested in holland's bank because I had faith in Holland.
Now, for your absurd decision on SNS,
-why didn't the bank use BCE's LTRO as all other banks in europe?
- how was it possible that SNS is so at risk to need an expropriation if balance sheets (audited by kpmg and controlled by Dutch National Bank )were very different from the imminent bankrupcy scenario?
If balance sheets are correct there cannot be need for an expropriation, if balance sheets were false there has been a fraud and cannot be charged on investors with Dutch State taking everything.
Were balance sheets correct or the management, auditor and controlling authority are responsible for abuses?
It is not fair charging investors without havin before checking a responsibilty of the above mentioned parties
- how was it possible that SNS is so at risk to need an expropriation if Dutch National Bank approved the redemption of partecipations Certificates just in december 2012?
- how was it possible that SNS is so at risk to need an expropriation if SNS had passed stress tests and no major negative event occourred both in financial or real estate market?
Why SNS IR never said there was a deadline for a industrial plan?
Why ING, Rabo did'nt put 500 million, knowing that the state would have taxed a billion?
Why senior certificate of the bank was'nt haircutted, if the trouble is in the bank?
semplicemente il form di contatto generale del sito del governo olandese (in realtà mi ci ha mandato passandodai contatti della pagina del ministero delle finanze)
https://www.government.nl/contact/contact-form
ed a [email protected]
(per banca d'Olanda ho tolto utima riga su esproprio in italia, non mi sembrave competesse loro...)
I'm sorry for my english.
I have invested in holland's bank because I had faith in Holland.
Now, for your absurd decision on SNS,
-why didn't the bank use BCE's LTRO as all other banks in europe?
- how was it possible that SNS is so at risk to need an expropriation if balance sheets (audited by kpmg and controlled by Dutch National Bank )were very different from the imminent bankrupcy scenario?
If balance sheets are correct there cannot be need for an expropriation, if balance sheets were false there has been a fraud and cannot be charged on investors with Dutch State taking everything.
Were balance sheets correct or the management, auditor and controlling authority are responsible for abuses?
It is not fair charging investors without havin before checking a responsibilty of the above mentioned parties
- how was it possible that SNS is so at risk to need an expropriation if Dutch National Bank approved the redemption of partecipations Certificates just in december 2012?
- how was it possible that SNS is so at risk to need an expropriation if SNS had passed stress tests and no major negative event occourred both in financial or real estate market?
Why SNS IR never said there was a deadline for a industrial plan?
Why ING, Rabo did'nt put 500 million, knowing that the state would have taxed a billion?
Why senior certificate of the bank was'nt haircutted, if the trouble is in the bank?