Derivati USA: CME-CBOT-NYMEX-ICE T-Bond-10y-Bund : la maledizione di f4f (vm18)

What's next for stocks
A big rally gave the S&P 500 its best 3rd quarter in 9 years and pushed the Dow near record highs. Can investors keep it going?
By Alexandra Twin, CNNMoney.com senior writer
September 29 2006: 9:51 AM EDT


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- What happened? The stock market was supposed to be all bad in the third quarter. Terribly bad for the bulls. Wonderfully bad for the bears.

But with one session left, the quarter's been anything but bad for Wall Street. The S&P 500 is on track for a gain of 5.2 percent, which barring a steep last-minute selloff, would be the best third quarter in nine years for the broad index.

The third quarter is usually the worst of the year. And this year it was supposed to be especially bad since 2006 is a mid-term election year, and third quarters in those years tend to be the worst of the worst (see graph). Yet 2006 is shaping up to be the best third-quarter in a mid-term election year since 1982, when the market rallied after hitting a bear market bottom in August, according to the Stock Trader's Almanac.

The rally has put the S&P 500 at another 5-1/2-year high and pushed the Dow near its record close set in January 2000, at the end of the 1990s boom. How did all this happen? And what's next for the market?

"A good third quarter in any year is unusual and one in a mid-term election year is even more unusual," said Jeffrey Hirsch, editor of Stock Trader's Almanac. "But there's no historical record of what it means for the fourth quarter."

That's a period that typically starts out weak on Wall Street but often ends up with a year-end "Santa Claus" rally. But will the showing so far this year, do the bulls need a rest?

Hirsch said the market is getting a boost this week from classic end-of-quarter moves by money managers who want to buy up winners before closing their books on the quarter.

"When the quarter ends or even after the mid-term elections and all the heavy buying ends, we could still see a pullback," he said, noting the tendency for stocks to slip in early October, but then rally through the end of the year.

There are many reasons the market has been doing well. The economy's still growing, although more slowly than in recent quarters, and corporate profits remain robust. The economy and earnings have held up even after a two-year rate hiking campaign from the Federal Reserve, which is now apparently on hold. Then there's the steep decline in oil and gas prices that have taken the edge off inflation worries and put more money into the hands of consumers.

On the other side of the ledger: The bull market, at nearly four years old, is ancient compared to other bull runs. Plus the economy is slowing, sharply, though it is still growing. Plus the housing market is eroding.

Yet, stocks are doing well. Year-to-date, the S&P 500 is up 7.3 percent, the Dow is up 9.4 percent and the Nasdaq composite is up 2.6 percent. The strength has surprised investors and even some seasoned market professionals.

Like other market historians, Standard & Poor's chief strategist Sam Stovall thought the third quarter would be a weak one. "My feeling was, here we are in a mid-term election year and we haven't had a 10-plus percent bull market correction," he said.

Both Stovall and Hirsch said the second-quarter decline of 7.7 percent on the S&P 500 could have been the sell-off for this year, although it would be light compared to other mid-term election year dips.

Now what?
Just like in May, the Dow is currently nearing its record closing high and the S&P 500 is at a 5-1/2 year peak. Still, the Nasdaq remains buried 55 percent off its high hit in March 2000, when the Internet bubble peaked.

From such lofty heights, could stocks be primed to slump through the rest of the year? That doesn't seem likely, most analysts said, but there are risks.

Investors seem to be back in a "Goldilocks" market, betting that growth is not too hot, not too cold, but just right, said Tom Schrader, managing director of listed trading at Legg Mason. "The economy is slowing, but not too much, and commodity prices are coming in, which means more money in consumer pockets going back to retail," Schrader said.

Stovall said one worry is that if oil prices - which have already bounced off of recent lows - rear back up too much in October, that could spark a stock selloff.

But the other side of that, Schrader said, "is that if oil prices drop too hard, that could signal that the economy is slowing more than people think, and then you would have recession fears again," he said, referring to the fact that the huge surge in oil prices over the last six years is a reflection of a booming global economy. (Click here for more on the economic outlook.)

A slower economy would hurt corporate profits, drive up price-to-earnings ratios, which would then make stocks seem less attractively valued. In fact, earnings disappointments are probably the biggest threat as investors move into October and third-quarter reports start rolling in.

"The risk is that with the economy set to slow, there will be downward revisions to company earnings for the rest of the year and going into 2007," said Alan Gayle, senior investment strategist at Trusco Capital Management.

Stovall said he thinks the market has a good shot at rallying in the fourth quarter, which is statistically the best quarter overall in the four-year presidential cycle, with S&P 500 gains averaging 7.6 percent going back to 1945.

But he's worried about earnings, too, noting that profit forecasts are too optimistic if the economy is going to slow to about a 2 percent growth rate next year from an expected 3.5 percent in 2006.

On Thursday, second-quarter gross domestic product growth was revised down to a slower-than-expected 2.6 percent rate. And on Wednesday, a monthly read showed a surprise slip in August durable goods orders.

But the market barely noticed either report, a sign investors are not yet factoring in the impact of a slowing economy on stocks.
 
September 29, 2006 01:38 PM ETFed's Poole says he'll back rate cuts if MURFREESBORO, Tennessee (Reuters) - St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank President William Poole said on Friday that inflation must be kept under wraps, but if both growth and price pressures were sufficiently weak, he would back a reduction in U.S. interest rates.

"If inflation pressures are easing, even if only gradually, and there is a genuine prospect that inflation will return to the comfort zone, then I see no reason to accelerate the decline in inflation by maintaining a restrictive policy in the face of declining employment," Poole told an audience at Middle Tennessee State University.

Recent investing newsAt Forbes: Consumers CrawlAt Forbes: U.S. Stocks: Third-Quarter Winners And LosersAt Forbes: Innovating By DesignAt Forbes: More Batteries IncludedAt Forbes: Dow Briefly Crosses Record, Again
"Policy needs to be as disciplined as necessary to get the job done, but not more so," he said.

"If it appears that the economy is falling below the baseline forecast path, then my bias will be in the direction of wanting to be sure that the data paint a consistent picture before I advocate a policy easing," the St. Louis Fed chief said. "But if the picture is consistent, and inflation risk is receding, then I will not hesitate to advocate policy easing."

Poole is slated to take a voting slot on the Fed's policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee next month if the Atlanta Fed does not have new president in place, and will be among the voting members of the panel next year as well.

After a series of 17 rate hikes stretching over a two-year period, the FOMC moved to the sidelines at its meeting on August 8 and again held rates steady at its last meeting on September 20.

Poole said he felt that the current setting of monetary policy was "mildly restrictive." He also spelled out that he felt the likelihood of a future cut in official interest rates was roughly equal to that of an increase.

"My own sense is that the outlook for the fed funds rate is roughly symmetrical," he said.

Poole acknowledged that interest rate futures signal some expectation the Fed will trim rates early next year, while 10-year U.S. Treasury note yields were lower than current Fed rates of 5.25 percent. He said that either bond yields would rise, or the Fed would ease.

"The spread between the fed funds rate and 10-year yields is negative and that is very unusual ... (it is) extremely unlikely to be the long-run equilibrium situation," he said.

Poole is generally considered an inflation hawk, but he made clear on Friday he was willing to act aggressively to buffer the economy if inflation were no longer a concern and growth was faltering.

"With long-run inflation contained, the FOMC has flexibility to respond, vigorously if necessary, to economic weakness should it arise," he said.

He also said that the latest numbers signaled that the United States may be over the peak of inflation.

"It looks like the worst of the inflation news may be behind us, but there is always the prospect of surprises," Poole told reporters after delivering the speech in this town, 35 miles

south of Nashville.

The U.S. Commerce Department said earlier on Friday that the core PCE price index, the Fed's favored measure of price pressures facing consumers, rose 0.2 percent in August after gaining 0.1 percent in July.

The year-on-year pace of the core PCE rose by a faster clip of 2.5 percent, after 2.3 percent the previous month. But Poole said this reflected comparison effects with inflation last year and said he paid more attention to the monthly change.

"The most recent numbers are in line with expectations and suggest to me we are either on hold, or it looks like ... the tendency for the inflation rate to be rising has stopped and maybe we are getting ... a little better news," he said.

But Poole emphasized that his first concern was keeping inflation at bay.

"Inflation control is our ... most important responsibility and we should not allow wishful thinking to delay tough action," he said.

Copyright 2006 Reuters
 
..

1159563522q4_spx_1990-2005.jpg
 
Investment Managers Discover
Deals in U.S. Stock Markets

By ELEANOR LAISE
September 27, 2006; Page D2

Money managers increasingly are finding bargains in the U.S. stock market on the assumption that the economy will slow but not fall into recession, according to a survey set to be released today.

Some 35% of money managers surveyed believe that U.S. stocks are undervalued, according to the quarterly Investment Manager Outlook survey by Russell Investment Group. This is the highest level recorded in the more-than-two-year history of the survey.

While half of investment managers expect U.S. economic growth in the next 12 months will be slower than the 2.9% annual rate reported for the second quarter, none expect a recession, the survey showed.

Russell Investment Group, a subsidiary of Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co., manages more than $171 billion in assets as of June 30 and researches and selects money managers for institutional and retail investors. The firm also markets the Russell stock-market indexes. The survey, conducted from Aug. 30 to Sept. 7, asked investment professionals from 93 firms about their outlook on stocks, bonds and other investments.

Erik Ristuben, managing director of client investment strategies at Russell, said the apparent end to the Federal Reserve's long campaign of raising interest rates, coupled with the recent declines in the price of oil, have helped to ease investment managers' earlier concerns that the economy could experience runaway inflation or fall into recession.

As in the previous quarter, managers' most-favored asset class was U.S. large-cap growth, with 58% of survey participants bullish on those companies. "Growth" stocks are those whose earnings are growing faster than the market average. Jack Liebau, president of Liebau Asset Management Co. in Pasadena, Calif., and a survey participant, says he favors large-cap growth because it has lagged behind other asset classes for several years and "these are companies that have traditionally traded at a premium to the market and in most cases are now available at market multiples."

With some economic uncertainty cleared away, managers backed away from the relative safety of cash investments. Twenty-nine percent of managers favored cash in the third quarter, down from 38% three months ago. But managers still preferred cash to some asset classes that have seen especially strong returns in recent years, including real estate and U.S. small-cap value stocks. Value stocks are those that look cheap relative to their earnings or assets. Real estate was the least-favored asset class, with 5% of managers bullish on the sector, down from 7% in the second quarter.

Many investment professionals believe the Fed's next interest-rate move will be a cut, and managers boosted their outlook on some investments that could benefit as rates decline. Thirty-six percent of managers were bullish on Treasury bonds, up from 24% in the second quarter, and 53% favored the outlook for financial-services stocks, up from 43% three months ago.

Managers' view of developed international markets was unchanged from last quarter, with 52% of managers bullish on those stocks. But managers grew more optimistic about other foreign stocks, with 37% favoring the outlook for emerging markets, up from 30% three months ago. "Once the worst-case scenario of a recession is taken off the table, you'd expect a bounce out of emerging markets," said Russell's Mr. Ristuben.

Write to Eleanor Laise at [email protected]
 
Divergences abound in the current market
By Brett Steenbarger

TradingMarkets.com
September 29, 2006 9:00 AM ET

| View Archives | Print | E-mail this page to a friend |


In a recent article, I proposed a simple indicator. Look over the past 20 days and subtract the number of days in which we've made a 20-day low from the number of days in which we've made a 20-day high. There's no question we've been strong on that measure in the S&P 500 Index. We've had no 20-day lows in the past 20 days, and we've had nine highs.

Ah, but strength does not always bring strength. Since 2004, my research found that market returns are subnormal--and actually negative over the next two weeks--when we've had five or more new 20-day highs than lows. When new low days have outnumbered new highs by five or more over a 20-day period, market returns have been extremely bullish.

But it's not just market strength that has me concerned. I also notice strength in the large cap indices that isn't being matched by strength elsewhere. Consider the following:

This week, so far, we've seen a maximum number of 1239 stocks register fresh 20-day highs. The week before we had 1498. The week before that, we hit 1622. (Kudos to the Barchart site for these numbers).

The Russell 2000 Index (IWM | charts | news | PowerRating) is off its highs from last week and well off its May highs, even as the S&P 500 Index is making fresh bull market highs. Midcap stocks (MDY | charts | news | PowerRating) are similarly off their May highs, as is the NASDAQ 100 (QQQQ | charts | news | PowerRating).

The Energy sector (XLE | charts | news | PowerRating) is well off its bull market highs. Also failing to make new 20 day highs recently were the Financial (XLF | charts | news | PowerRating), Consumer Staples (XLP | charts | news | PowerRating), Healthcare (XLV | charts | news | PowerRating), and Semiconductor (SMH | charts | news | PowerRating) sectors.

Dow Transports (TRAN | charts | news | PowerRating) and Utilities (UTIL | charts | news | PowerRating) are both well off their highs.
How broad is the large cap rally? Consider this:

On Thursday, only 37 of the S&P 500 stocks made annual new highs. That figure was 46 the day before that and 48 on Tuesday. Just two weeks ago, we had well over 60 new highs among S&P 500 stocks. In March, we had well over 90 new highs.

Four Dow Jones Industrial Average stocks out of the 30 made new 52-week highs on Thursday. That was down from six the previous two sessions and down from eight two weeks ago.

NASDAQ large caps? Only four of the 100 in the NASDAQ 100 Index made new highs on Thursday, down from six the previous day and nine two weeks ago. In March we had over 15 new highs. (Hats off to the Decision Point site for tracking these numbers).
The bottom line is that a narrowing base of large cap issues, highly weighted in the major indices, are carrying this market higher. As we look from the March-May period to the present period and even within the last few trading sessions, the rise is becoming more selective. Every piece of research I have conducted suggests to me that, on average, intermediate-term market returns are subnormal following such extended narrowing.

Brett N. Steenbarger, Ph.D. is Associate Clinical Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at SUNY Upstate
 
A Very Human Index: Few People Realize Just How Arbitrary the Dow Is
Posted on Sep 28th, 2006 with stocks: AIG, EK, IP, PFE, SPX, T, VZ

Geoff Gannon submits: As the Dow approaches a new all-time high (the record close was 11,722.98 -- today's was 11,718.45), now would be a good time to take a break from the financial news found on your televisions, in your newspapers, (and yes) even on your computers.

A new high is an empty headline. I'm not writing to tell you that; you already know that. What you may not fully appreciate is just how arbitrary an index the Dow Jones Industrial Average really is.

Most notably, it's no longer very industrial. Only about one of every three stocks in the Dow is involved in what might be considered an old-line industrial (heavy manufacturing, extraction, etc.) business. A lot of the Dow components are involved in totally different businesses such as consumer products, health care, and technology. For the most part, these businesses are usually a lot less tangible. The businesses are mostly asset-light; their future prospects are mostly company specific.

Today, the extent to which the common stocks of the thirty companies move together may have more to do with their shared classification as "Dow" stocks than with the future prospects of the underlying businesses.

On April 8, 2004, some changes were made to the Dow. These weren't the first changes – and they won't be the last. Such changes add to the arbitrary nature of the index, especially in the short-term.

Generally, the changes have been motivated more by who needs to go than by who needs to come in. Discarded Dow components can usually blame a dying industry for their exit. Sometimes, a rapidly dwindling market cap helped.

The April 2004 changes involved three spots in the index and six stocks.

Departures: AT&T (T), Eastman Kodak (EK), and International Paper (IP)

Arrivals: Verizon (VZ), American International Group (AIG), and Pfizer (PFE)

Please note that AT&T is now back in the Dow. In November 2005, SBC Communications, which was itself born from the 1984 divestiture agreement between AT&T and the Justice Department, changed its name to AT&T after acquiring that company. It also adopted the ticker symbol associated with that name (T). As a result, a chart of the new AT&T does not reflect the fortunes of the old AT&T.

Here's how the six have fared since the April 2004 reshuffle versus the S&P 500:


1159563939gannonchart.gif


(Note: The actual changes to the index occurred on April 8, 2004; however, these changes had been announced by April 1, 2004).

I also added the S&P 500 to the chart to reinforce the obvious – none of these stocks has fared particularly well. In fact, since the changes, they've all basically underperformed the S&P 500. With the exception of Kodak (and Verizon for a very short time), none of the stocks have even managed to trade above the share price they had at the time of the reshuffle.

Is this just a coincidence?

As a rule, reshuffling an index through human intervention is likely to produce odd (and unexpected) coincidences.

The Dow is made up of a small number of companies. These companies tend to be very high-profile businesses. They are also high-profile stocks. Usually, they were high-profile stocks before they entered; but, obviously, being added to the Dow only increases investor interest in their fortunes. Any human intervention is likely to reflect the (current) biases of investors and the financial media.

The result? A very human index.
 
Core inflation rising at fastest pace in 11 years
Incomes, spending grow at slowest pace this year

Nutting, MarketWatch
Last Update: 11:37 AM ET Sep 29, 2006


WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- U.S. core consumer price inflation hit an 11-year high in August as household incomes and spending rose at the slowest pace this year, the Commerce Department reported Friday.

Consumer prices rose 0.2% in August, and are up 3.2% in the past year, the government said. Core consumer prices, which exclude food and energy, also rose 0.2%.

The core personal consumption expenditure price index -- the key inflation gauge followed by the Federal Reserve -- has gained 2.5% in the past 12 months, the most since January 1995.
Core inflation was up 2.3% year-on-year in August, as core inflation increased 0.1% in August. Read the full government report.

Personal incomes grew 0.3% as expected in August after rising 0.5% in July. Consumer spending increased 0.1% in August after rising 0.8% in July. Economists expected spending to increase 0.2%, according to a survey conducted by MarketWatch. See Economic Calendar.

The report had little impact in financial markets, which were focused on the end of the quarter. See Market Snapshot.
The report has mixed consequences for Fed policy, likely leaving the Federal Open Market Committee on course to hold its overnight interest rate target rate steady again in late October. See our complete Fed coverage.

Core inflation has reached an 11-year high and is now about a half percentage point above the level some Fed officials have said marks their comfort zone. On the other hand, the report reflects a weakening in both income growth and spending. The Fed has said that a slower economy would corral inflationary pressures in the economy.

"We're likely to see pretty lackluster growth," said Bill Hampel, chief economist for the Credit Union National Association. "It's further evidence that the housing slowdown is biting."

Hampel said the next move by the Fed would probably be a rate cut.

Personal incomes grew 0.3% in nominal terms in August, as compensation of employees increased just 0.1%. It's the weakest income growth since November.

After-tax, inflation-adjusted real disposable incomes rose 0.2% in August.
Rental income increased 4.3% after rising 4.9% in July. Proprietors' income increased 0.5%.
Consumer spending increased 0.1% in August, the slowest growth in nominal terms since November. After adjusting for inflation, real consumer spending fell 0.1%, the first decline since September 2005.

Real spending on durable goods fell 1.3%. Real spending on nondurable goods fell 0.2%. Real spending on services increased 0.1%.

Despite the weak spending in August, "third-quarter consumption will still rise at a decent clip," said Ian Shepherdson, chief U.S. economist for High Frequency Economics. The fourth quarter will start off well, he said, "but expect this to fade by year-end."

With incomes growing slightly faster than spending, the personal savings rate improved to negative 0.5% from negative 0.7%. The savings rate has been negative for 17 straight months.

In other reports, the University of Michigan said its consumer sentiment index improved to 85.4 in September from 82.0 in August and 84.4 in early September.

The Chicago purchasing managers' index showed broad-based growth in the regional economy in September, with the index rising to 62.1% from 57.1 See full story.
 
Ripeto ormai da tempo che molta della liquidità che alimenta i mercati è sintetica e non proviene direttamente dagli investitori individuali.
Buona parte proviene dallo sfruttamento delle valute con i tassi più bassi attraverso il carry.


per meglio visualizzare quanto dico e per dimostrare la predittività di questa correlazione vi mostro tre grafici che mostrano la relazione tra l'andamento dello yen index invertito e lo spoore nel primo grafico, tra lo yen index e il dax nel secondo e tra il franco svizzero e il dax nel terzo.
Notare come la valuta tende ad anticipare i movimenti dei mercati e come con la mancata debolezza del franco svizzero degli ultimi tempi la sua influenza è andata scemando seppure sia ancora in parte utilizzata.

1159566333xjyspoorerapporto.png


1159566348xjydaxrapporto.png


1159566372swiissaxrapporto.png
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Alto