Titoli di Stato area non Euro ARGENTINA obbligazioni e tango bond (2 lettori)

archmax

Forumer attivo
grazie arch.:up: la mia posizione attuale sul warrant è difensiva.dopo aver fatto fuori quasi tutto poco sotto 8 prima della crisi valutaria ,ho 275k e attendo il 27 marzo. per il resto sono posizionato su baires bonds.qual'è la tua strategia sul warrant?

Sono rientrato in più tranches in piena crisi valutaria con prezzo medio intorno a 6, aspetto anch'io il 27 marzo sperando in una conferma della crescita stimata negli EMAE (IMHO probabile) e quindi una possibile (anche successiva) ulteriore risalita dei prezzi, magari fino a 8,5 toccato qualche mese fà, per eventualmente alleggerire un pò (attualmente siamo in vendita a 7,7 circa) e poi aspettare per rientrare.
L'incognita maggiore è l'influenza dell'annunciato cambio dell'anno base per il calcolo della crescita (da quest'anno), bisognerà fare velocemente delle prove con il foglio di calcolo appena si avranno le idee più chiare il 27 o prima se trapela qualcosa.
Se il prezzo dovesse scendere potrei alleggerire anche prima e incassare il gain ......... :)
 
SALVE RAGAZZI MIA ZIA POSSIEDE 51000 DI TANGO BOND ISIN XS0109203298 e visto che lavoro da poco in Mediolanum ieri dopo che mi ha rivelato tale notizia sono andato dal direttore di banca con lei a chiedere info. Mi ha spiegato di questa famosa sentenza di Giugno che dovrebbe mettere le cose a posto e mi ha inoltre detto che questi titoli sono liquidi e ci sono degli speculatori pronti a comprarli. mi ha dato anche un valore del titolo intorno a 46 ma scambiato in Germania. Prima di andare mi sono informato ed in effetti ho visto che in Italia non erano quotati ma solo a Berlino anche se la quotazione non era in tempo reale ed era ferma a Gennaio e molto più bassa di 46 (intorno a 32). Vi volevo chiedere se è vero che ci sono speculatori disposti a comprarli e dove posso trovare le quotazioni giornaliere. Secondo il mio modesto parere se ci fosse qualcuno che mi da quasi la metà io li venderei in un batter d'occhio. Qualsiasi altro consiglio o considerazione è davvero benvenuto.
Grazie
Cristian
 

fabriziof

Forumer storico
Sono rientrato in più tranches in piena crisi valutaria con prezzo medio intorno a 6, aspetto anch'io il 27 marzo sperando in una conferma della crescita stimata negli EMAE (IMHO probabile) e quindi una possibile (anche successiva) ulteriore risalita dei prezzi, magari fino a 8,5 toccato qualche mese fà, per eventualmente alleggerire un pò (attualmente siamo in vendita a 7,7 circa) e poi aspettare per rientrare.
L'incognita maggiore è l'influenza dell'annunciato cambio dell'anno base per il calcolo della crescita (da quest'anno), bisognerà fare velocemente delle prove con il foglio di calcolo appena si avranno le idee più chiare il 27 o prima se trapela qualcosa.
Se il prezzo dovesse scendere potrei alleggerire anche prima e incassare il gain ......... :)
ok allora attendo un tuo intervento sul 3d del fol ,se ci fossero novità sul cambio di metodologia :up:
 

fabriziof

Forumer storico
SALVE RAGAZZI MIA ZIA POSSIEDE 51000 DI TANGO BOND ISIN XS0109203298 e visto che lavoro da poco in Mediolanum ieri dopo che mi ha rivelato tale notizia sono andato dal direttore di banca con lei a chiedere info. Mi ha spiegato di questa famosa sentenza di Giugno che dovrebbe mettere le cose a posto e mi ha inoltre detto che questi titoli sono liquidi e ci sono degli speculatori pronti a comprarli. mi ha dato anche un valore del titolo intorno a 46 ma scambiato in Germania. Prima di andare mi sono informato ed in effetti ho visto che in Italia non erano quotati ma solo a Berlino anche se la quotazione non era in tempo reale ed era ferma a Gennaio e molto più bassa di 46 (intorno a 32). Vi volevo chiedere se è vero che ci sono speculatori disposti a comprarli e dove posso trovare le quotazioni giornaliere. Secondo il mio modesto parere se ci fosse qualcuno che mi da quasi la metà io li venderei in un batter d'occhio. Qualsiasi altro consiglio o considerazione è davvero benvenuto.
Grazie
Cristian
titolo quotato in germania ma negoziabile otc via telefono,molte banche lo consentono
 

gionmorg

low cost high value
Membro dello Staff
Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Argentina's government bond rating to Caa1, stable outlook
Global Credit Research - 17 Mar 2014
NOTE: 3/17/2014: Amended debt list under Affirmation:

Issuer: Argentina, Government of

…Other short Term ratings, Affirmed NP

New York, March 17, 2014 -- Moody's Investors Service has today downgraded Argentina's government bond rating to Caa1 from B3, and changed the outlook to stable from negative. Concurrently, Moody's has downgraded its rating on Argentina's foreign legislation debt to (P)Caa2 from (P)Caa1.

RATINGS RATIONALE

RATIONALE FOR DOWNGRADE

Moody's decision to downgrade Argentina's government bond rating was driven by the following factors:

1. A significant fall in official reserves, which have dropped to $27.5 billion from a high of $52.7 billion in 2011, thereby increasing the risk that Argentina may not meet its foreign-currency debt service obligations, and

2. An inconsistent policy environment that increases the likelihood that official reserves will remain under pressure this year and next.

FIRST DRIVER -- FALL IN OFFICIAL RESERVES

A combination of persistent capital flight and declining trade surpluses have put pressure on official international reserves which fell to $27.5 billion from a high of $52.7 billion in 2011. While reserves have stabilized in the last month, there are continued high risks of further drops, a key credit risk since Argentina lacks international market access and utilizes central bank reserves to meet its foreign currency debt obligations.

Argentina is one of the few Latin American countries with a capital account deficit due to persistent capital outflows and a lack of access to international debt markets. The trade surplus, which helped prop up dollar inflows for years, fell 27% in 2013 compared to 2012 levels. Lack of confidence in government economic policies, including one of the region's highest inflation rates, will make it difficult to prevent continued capital flight.

Argentina's government relies on the use of official reserves to meet its foreign currency obligations. Moody's estimates that the government faces dollar debt payments of over $20 billion between 2014 and 2015. However, Argentina does not have external funding options that would reduce its reliance on official reserves to pay debt.

SECOND DRIVER -- AN INCONSISTENT POLICY ENVIRONMENT WILL MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO REVERSE RESERVE LOSSES

The fall in reserves and the lack of market access both reflect unsustainable economic policy decisions that have led to very high inflation, currency depreciation, capital flight and economic stagnation. Inflation, which was averaging 25% annually in recent years, will likely spike higher in 2014, partly due to January's 17% currency devaluation, which was itself the result of the need to stem dollar outflows. Moody's expects the Argentinean government to face further pressure on official reserves and the currency.

Despite talk of lowering some energy subsidies, the government has not reduced ongoing fiscal imbalances. Moody's therefore expects that the monetization of the fiscal deficit will continue feeding inflation. The central bank's policy of higher interest rates and faster currency depreciation will have a negative impact on economic growth. Political challenges will also reduce the government's room to maneuver as unions resist official efforts to keep wage increases below expected inflation. The Paris Club recently invited Argentina to hold negotiations to settle outstanding debt but this is unlikely to materially improve reserve levels. A final agreement with the Paris Club could lead to new bilateral lending but it will take months for any agreement to be finalized and we expect any new bilateral funding to remain limited in the next two years.

RATIONALE FOR STABLE OUTLOOK

The stable outlook on the Caa1 rating reflects Moody's view that no further rating changes are likely in the near future. The stable outlook is premised on a balance between no further significant drops in official reserves and continued government difficulties in addressing macroeconomic imbalances.

WHAT COULD MOVE THE RATINGS UP/DOWN

Moody's would consider moving the government bond rating outlook to positive upon evidence that Argentina's funding options have improved and that economic policies have become more consistent and predictable.

Argentina's foreign legislation bonds could potentially be upgraded back to the level of the issuer rating if the final court ruling does not affect Argentina's payments on its restructured debt.

A downgrade of the issuer rating could result if policy decisions end up having a negative impact on the main economic and debt metrics. Additionally, a persistent decline in international reserves and a rise in the country's debt ratios could also result in a lower rating. A further downgrade of Argentina's foreign legislation debt could result if Argentina's reaction to a final court ruling involves missed payments to restructured debt bondholders.

COUNTRY CEILINGS

As a result of this rating action, Moody's has adjusted the long-term local currency bond and deposit ceilings to B1 from Ba3. The long-term foreign-currency deposit ceiling was changed to Caa2 from Caa1. The long-term foreign-currency bond ceiling changed to Caa1 from B3. All foreign currency short-term ceilings remain at Not Prime. Country ceilings reflect a range of undiversifiable risks to which issuers in any jurisdiction are exposed, including economic, legal and political risks. These ceilings act as a cap on ratings that can be assigned to the foreign- and local-currency obligations of entities domiciled in the country.

Downgrades:

..Issuer: Argentina

.... Country Ceiling Bank Deposit Rating, Downgraded to Caa2 from Caa1

.... Country Ceiling Rating, Downgraded to Caa1 from B3

..Issuer: Argentina, Government of

.... Issuer Rating, Downgraded to Caa1 from B3

....Senior Unsecured Shelf, Downgraded to (P)Caa2 from (P)Caa1

....Senior Unsecured Shelf, Downgraded to (P)Caa1 from (P)B3

Outlook Actions:

..Issuer: Argentina

....Outlook, Changed To No Outlook From Negative

..Issuer: Argentina, Government of

....Outlook, Changed To Stable From Negative

Affirmations:

..Issuer: Argentina

.... Country Ceiling Bank Deposit Rating, Affirmed NP

.... Country Ceiling Rating, Affirmed NP

..Issuer: Argentina, Government of

....Senior Unsecured Medium-Term Note Program, Affirmed (P)Ca

....Senior Unsecured Medium-Term Note Program, Affirmed (P)NP

....Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture , Affirmed Ca

....Senior Unsecured Shelf, Affirmed (P)Ca

….Other short Term ratings, Affirmed NP

GDP per capita (PPP basis, US$): 17,917 (2012 Actual) (also known as Per Capita Income)&Real GDP growth (% change): 3% (2013 Actual) (also known as GDP Growth)&Inflation Rate (CPI, % change Dec/Dec): 11.5% (2013 Actual) &Gen. Gov. Financial Balance/GDP: -2.4% (2013 Actual) (also known as Fiscal Balance)&Current Account Balance/GDP: -0.7% (2013 Actual) (also known as External Balance)&External debt/GDP: 28.5 (2013 Actual) &Level of economic development: Low level of economic resilience &Default history: At least one default event (on bonds and/or loans) has been recorded since 1983. &

On 07 March 2014, a rating committee was called to discuss the rating of the Argentina, Government of. The main points raised during the discussion were: The issuer's economic fundamentals, including its economic strength, have materially decreased. The systemic risk in which the issuer operates has materially increased. The issuer has become increasingly susceptible to event risks. An analysis of this issuer, relative to its peers, indicates that a repositioning of its rating would be appropriate. Other views raised included: The issuer's institutional strength/ framework, have not materially changed. The issuer's governance and/or management, have not materially changed. The issuer's fiscal or financial strength, including its debt profile, has not materially changed.

The principal methodology used in this rating was Sovereign Bond Ratings published in September, 2013. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.

The weighting of all rating factors is described in the methodology used in this rating action, if applicable.
 

gionmorg

low cost high value
Membro dello Staff
Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Argentine Utilities and Infrastructure companies to Caa1 The document has been translated in other languages
Global Credit Research - 19 Mar 2014
Buenos Aires City, March 19, 2014 -- Moody's Latin America Agente de Calificación de Riesgo today downgraded the global scale debt and issuer ratings for various utilities and infrastructure companies operating in Argentina to Caa1 from B3. The action follows Moody's 17 March 2014 downgrade of the Argentine government's bond rating to Caa1 with stable outlook from B3 with negative outlook. The deterioration in Argentina's credit profile as captured in the rating downgrade has direct implications for the ratings of infrastructure issuers, given that it also expresses the increase of systemic risks for all local credits.

At the same time and in light of the downgrade in the global scale, issuer and foreign currency debt ratings, Moody´s downgraded the national scale ratings of several infrastructure issuers.

Moody's downgraded the following ratings:

1) Aeropuertos Argentina 2000 S.A.

Corporate Family Rating, USD 300 million 2020 Senior Unsecured Notes and Class "A" , Class "B" and Class "C" Senior Unsecured Local Notes: downgraded to Caa1/Ba1.ar from B3/A2.ar. The rating outlook is now stable.

2) Empresa Distribuidora de Electricidad de Salta S.A. (EDESA)

USD 63.00M Senior Unsecured Notes and ARS. 30 m senior unsecured term loan due in 2015: downgraded to Caa1/Ba1.ar from B3/A2.ar. The rating outlook is now stable.

3) Camuzzi Gas Pampeana S.A.

Corporate Family rating: downgraded to Caa1/Ba2.ar from B3/Baa3.ar. The rating outlook is now stable.

4) Gas Natural Ban S.A.

Corporate Family rating: downgraded to Caa1/Ba2.ar from B3/Baa1.ar. The rating outlook is now stable.

5) Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. (TGS):

Senior Unsecured Notes: downgraded to Caa1/Ba1.ar from B3/A2.ar. The rating outlook remains stable.

6) Hidroeléctrica El Chocon S.A.

Corporate Family rating: downgraded to Caa1/Ba1.ar from B3/A2.ar. The rating outlook remains stable.

7) Genneia S.A.

USD Senior Secured Notes, USD Senior Unsecured Notes and Corporate Family Rating: downgraded to Caa1/Ba1.ar from B3/A3.ar. The rating outlook remains stable.

8) Central Térmica Loma de la Lata S.A. (CTLLL)

USD 178 million Senior Secured Notes: downgraded to Caa1/Ba2.ar from B3/Baa1.ar. The rating outlook remains stable.

9) Generación Independencia S.A.

USD 28 million Senior Unsecured Notes and Corporate Family rating: downgraded to Caa1/Ba1.ar from B3/A3.ar. The rating outlook remains stable.

10) Empresa Provincial de Energía de Córdoba (EPEC):

USD 565 Senior Secured Notes: and Corporate Family rating downgraded to Caa1/Ba3.ar from B3/Baa2.ar. The rating outlook is now stable.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The global scale ratings for these infrastructure issuers have been downgraded so they align with Moody's Argentina's sovereign and foreign currency country ceiling ratings after Moody's downgraded them to Caa1 from B3. The alignment reflects Moody's view that the creditworthiness of these companies cannot be completely de-linked from the current operating environment and regulatory regimes in Argentina, which have made credit quality more uncertain for companies operating within its borders.

Please refer to Moody's Cross Sector Rating Methodology "How Sovereign Credit Quality May Affect Other Ratings" published on 13 February 2012, and available on www.moodys.com.ar

Moody's decision to downgrade Argentina's government bond rating was driven by the following factors:

1. A significant fall in official reserves, which have dropped to $27.5 billion from a high of $52.7 billion in 2011, thereby increasing the risk that Argentina may not meet its foreign-currency debt service obligations, and

2. An inconsistent policy environment that increases the likelihood that official reserves will remain under pressure this year and next.

Moody's rates more than 10 infrastructure issuers that are either regulated concessions, subject to government regulated tariffs and/or power generating companies that depend upon government direct payments and local economic conditions. The downgrade on the national scale ratings for all these infrastructure issuers reflects Moody's view that a weaker economic environment amid inconsistent policy environment will negatively impact infrastructure companies' operating environment as well as their funding options. Their national scale ratings within the Ba.ar range therefore reflect below-average creditworthiness relative to other domestic issuers.

The stable outlook for all these companies mainly reflects Moody's stable outlook for Argentina's government bond rating and Moody's view that the creditworthiness of these companies is highly dependent on the credit quality of the Argentine government. Therefore, a further rating downgrade of the sovereign would likely result in negative rating actions for these companies and an upgrade in positive rating actions, even in the absence of any significant change in their underlying credit quality.

Please see www.moodys.com.ar for further details on the recent change in Argentina's foreign currency bond ceiling and government's rating outlook.

The principal methodology used in rating Empresa Distribuidora de Electricidad Salta, Gas Natural BAN, S.A., Camuzzi Gas Pampeana S.A. and Empresa Provincial de Energia de Cordoba was Regulated Electric and Gas Utilities published in December 2013. The principal methodology used in rating Genneia S.A., Hidroelectrica El Chocon S.A., Generacion Independencia S.A. and Central Termica Loma de la Lata S.A. (CTLLL) was Unregulated Utilities and Power Companies published in August 2009. The principal methodology used in rating Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. was Natural Gas Pipelines published in November 2012. The principal methodology used in rating Aeropuertos Argentina 2000 S.A. was Operational Airports outside of the United States published in May 2008. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com.ar for a copy of these methodologies.

Moody's National Scale Credit Ratings (NSRs) are intended as relative measures of creditworthiness among debt issues and issuers within a country, enabling market participants to better differentiate relative risks. NSRs differ from Moody's global scale credit ratings in that they are not globally comparable with the full universe of Moody's rated entities, but only with NSRs for other rated debt issues and issuers within the same country. NSRs are designated by a ".nn" country modifier signifying the relevant country, as in ".mx" for Mexico. For further information on Moody's approach to national scale credit ratings, please refer to Moody's Credit rating Methodology published in October 2012 entitled "Mapping Moody's National Scale Credit Ratings to Global Scale Credit Ratings".

With the recent downgrade of the government of Argentina on the global rating scale and other issuers whose risk profiles are affected by related credit considerations, the distribution of ratings among issuers in Argentina has become compressed within the bottom half of the national rating scale. As a result, the current mapping of global scale ratings to national scale ratings may no longer be adequately serving one of its intended purposes, which is to provide substantially greater potential credit differentiation among issuers in Argentina than is possible on the global rating scale. Moody's is therefore assessing the opportunity to revise its mapping from global scale ratings to national scale ratings for Argentina. If the mapping is revised, the new scale would likely imply that higher rated Argentine issuers would be remapped to higher ratings on the national scale.
 

gionmorg

low cost high value
Membro dello Staff
Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Argentine companies The document has been translated in other languages
Global Credit Research - 19 Mar 2014
Buenos Aires City, March 19, 2014 -- Moody's Latin America Agente de Calificación de Riesgo downgraded the global scale debt and issuer ratings for several Argentine non-financial corporates to Caa1 from B3. The action follows Moody's 17 March 2014 downgrade of the Argentine government's bond rating to Caa1 with stable outlook from B3 with negative outlook. The deterioration in Argentina's credit profile as captured in the rating downgrade has direct implications for the ratings of corporates, given that it also expresses the increase of systemic risks for all local credits.

At the same time and in light of the downgrade of the global scale, issuer and foreign and local currency debt ratings, Moody´s downgraded the ratings of the following issuers:

The ratings affected are detailed as follows:

1. Alto Paraná S.A: B2 Global Local Currency Corporate Family Rating from B1 Global Local Currency Corporate Family Rating; The Baa3 Global Foreign Currency and Aaa.ar National Foreign Currency rating of the Senior Unsecured Notes remain unchanged (backed).

2. Aluar Aluminio Argentino S.A.I.C.: B3 Global Local Currency Corporate Family Rating and A2.ar National Local Currency rating from B2/Aa3.ar; B3 Global Foreign Currency and A2.ar National Local Currency for the Senior Unsecured Notes, from B2/Aa3.ar

3. Arcor S.A.I.C: B2 Global Local Currency Corporate Family Rating from B1 Global Local Currency Corporate Family Rating; B2 Global Foreign & National Currency rating for the Senior Unsecured Notes and Aa3.ar National Foreign & National Currency rating for the Senior Unsecured Notes from B1/Aa2.ar

4. Asociación de Cooperativas Argentinas SA: B3 Global Local Currency Corporate Family Rating and A2.ar National Local Currency Corporate Family Rating from B2/A1.ar; B3 Global National & Local Currency rating and A2.ar National Global & Local Currency rating for the Unsecured Bank Credit Facility, from B2/A1.ar.

5. Cablevision S.A: Caa1 Global Foreign Currency Corporate Family rating from B3; Caa1 Global Foreign Currency rating for the Senior Unsecured Notes, from B3.

6. Car Security S.A.: Caa1 Global Local Currency Corporate Family rating and Ba1.ar National Local Currency Corporate Family rating, from B3/A3.ar

7. Carsa S.A.: Caa1 Global Local Currency Corporate Family Rating and Ba1.ar National Local Currency Corporate Family Rating, from B3/A2.ar; Caa1 Global Local Currency rating and Ba1.ar National Local Currency rating for the Senior Unsecured Notes, from B3/A2.ar

8. Electroingenieria S.A.: Caa1 Global Local Currency and Ba1.ar National Local Currency Corporate Family Ratings, from B3/A3.ar

9. Holcim (Argentina) S.A: B3 Global Local Currency Corporate Family Rating from B2; the A2.ar National Local Currency Corporate Family Rating remains unchanged, given that it still maps to the rating category.

10. Jose Cartellone Construcciones Civiles S.A.: Caa1 Global Local Currency Corporate Family Rating and Ba1.ar National Local Currency Corporate Family Rating, from B3/A3.ar; Caa1 Global Local Currency rating and Ba1.ar National Local Currency rating for the Senior Unsecured Bank Credit Facility, from B3/A3.ar

11. Longvie S.A: Caa1 Global Local Currency Corporate Family Rating and Ba1.ar National Local Currency Corporate Family Rating, from B3/A3.ar; Caa1 Global Local Currency rating and Ba1.ar National Local Currency rating for the Senior Unsecured Notes, from B3/A3.ar

12. Mirgor S.A: Caa1 Global Local Currency Corporate Family Rating and Ba1.ar National Local Currency Corporate Family Rating, from B3/A3.ar; Caa1 Global Local Currency rating and Ba1.ar National Local Currency rating for the Senior Unsecured Bank Credit Facility, from B3/Baa1.ar

13. Newsan S.A: B3 Global Local Currency Corporate Family Rating and A2.ar National Local Currency Corporate Family Rating, from B2/Aa3.ar; B3 Global Local Currency rating and A2.ar National Local Currency rating for the Senior Unsecured Bank Credit Facility, from B2/Aa3.ar; B3 Global Local Currency rating and A2.ar National Local Currency rating for the Senior Unsecured Notes, from B2/Aa3.ar

14. Papel Misionero S.A.I.C.F: Ba1.ar National Local Currency rating for the Senior Unsecured Bank Credit Facility, from Baa1.ar

15. Pilisar S.A: the Caa3 Global Local Currency Corporate Family Rating remains unchanged, given that it was already below the sovereign rating; B3 Global Local Currency rating and A2.ar National Local Currency rating for the Senior Unsecured Bank Credit Facility, from B2/Aa3.ar

16. Quickfood S.A: the Caa2 Global Local Currency Corporate Family Rating remains unchanged, given that it was already below the sovereign rating; B3.ar National Local Currency Corporate Family rating, from B2.ar; the Baa3 Global Foreign Currency and Aaa.ar National Foreign Currency rating of the Senior Secured Notes remain unchanged (backed).

17. Raghsa S.A: Caa1 Global Local Currency Corporate Family Rating and Ba1.ar National Local Currency Corporate Family Rating, from B3/Baa2.ar; Caa1 Global Foreign Currency rating and Ba1.ar National Foreign Currency rating for the Senior Unsecured Notes, from B3/Baa2.ar

18. Sullair Argentina S.A: Caa1 Global Local Currency Corporate Family Rating and Ba1.ar National Local Currency Corporate Family Rating, from B3/A2.ar; Caa1 Global Local Currency rating and Ba1.ar National Local Currency rating for the Senior Unsecured Bank Credit Facility, from B3/A2.ar

19. YPF S.A: Caa1 Global Local Currency Issuer Rating and Ba1.ar National Local Currency Issuer Rating, from B3/A2.ar; Caa1 and (P)Caa1 Global Foreign Currency rating for the Senior Unsecured Notes and Medium-Term Note Program, from B3 and P(B3).

20. Zucamor S.A: Caa1 Global Local Currency Corporate Family Rating and Ba1.ar National Local Currency Corporate Family Rating, from B3/Baa1.ar; Caa1 Global Foreign Currency rating and Ba1.ar National Foreign Currency rating for the Senior Unsecured Bank Credit Facility, from B3/Baa1.ar

21. Pan American Energy LLC: B2 Global Local Currency Corporate Family Rating, from B1. Pan American Energy LLC, (Argentine Branch): B2 Global Local Currency rating for the Senior Unsecured Bank Credit Facility, from B1. Aa3.ar National Local Currency rating for the Senior Unsecured Bank Credit Facility, from Aa2.ar.; B2 Global Foreign Currency rating for the Senior Unsecured Notes, from B1.

22. Petrobras Argentina S.A: B2 Global Local Currency Corporate Family Rating, from B1; B2 Global Foreign Currency rating for the Senior Unsecured Notes, from B1; B1 Global Foreign Currency rating for the Senior Secured Notes, from Ba3; the Baa1 Global Foreign Currency rating for the Backed Senior Unsecured Notes remains unchanged, as well as the Aaa.ar National Foreign Currency Rating for the same Backed Senior Unsecured Notes,

At the same time, Moody's changed the Outlook of AMS Foods International S.A to Stable from Negative, in line with the outlook change of its guarantor (Aval Rural S.G.R from Financial Intitutions Group). The Caa3 Global Local Currency Corporate Family Rating and the B2/A1.ar Foreign Currency ratings for the Backed Senior Unsecured notes remain unchanged.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The global scale ratings have been downgraded so they align with Moody's Argentina's sovereign and foreign currency country ceiling ratings after Moody's downgraded them to Caa1 from B3. Moody's believes that there has been no deterioration in the intrinsic credit quality of these corporates. Rather, their rating downgrades reflect Moody's view that the creditworthiness of these companies cannot be completely de-linked from the current operating environment and regulatory regimes in Argentina, which have made credit quality more uncertain for companies operating within its borders.

Please refer to Moody's Cross Sector Rating Methodology "How Sovereign Credit Quality May Affect Other Ratings" published on 13 February 2012, and available on www.moodys.com.ar.

Moody's decision to downgrade Argentina's government bond rating was driven by the following factors:

1. A significant fall in official reserves, which have dropped to $27.5 billion from a high of $52.7 billion in 2011, thereby increasing the risk that Argentina may not meet its foreign-currency debt service obligations, and

2. An inconsistent policy environment that increases the likelihood that official reserves will remain under pressure this year and next.

Moody's rates 20+ non-financial corporates that are highly dependent on local economic conditions. The downgrade of these issuers' national scale ratings reflects Moody's view that a weaker economic environment amid inconsistent policy environment will negatively impact the companies' operating environment as well as funding options; their national scale ratings within the Ba.ar range, therefore, reflect below-average creditworthiness relative to other domestic issuers.

The stable outlook for all these companies mainly reflects Moody's stable outlook for Argentina's government bond rating and Moody's view that the creditworthiness of these companies is highly dependent on the credit quality of the Argentine government. Moody's notes that a rating downgrade of the sovereign would likely result in negative rating actions on these companies so that the issuers' current notching gap relative to the sovereign would be maintained, in the absence of any significant change in their underlying credit quality.

Please see www.moodys.com.ar for further details on the recent change in Argentina's foreign currency bond ceiling and government's rating outlook.

With the recent downgrade of the government of Argentina on the global rating scale and other issuers whose risk profiles are affected by related credit considerations, the distribution of ratings among issuers in Argentina has become compressed within the bottom half of the national rating scale. As a result, the current mapping of global scale ratings to national scale ratings may no longer be adequately serving one of its intended purposes, which is to provide substantially greater potential credit differentiation among issuers in Argentina than is possible on the global rating scale. Moody's is therefore assessing the opportunity to revise its mapping from global scale ratings to national scale ratings for Argentina. If the mapping is revised, the new scale would likely imply that higher rated Argentine issuers would be remapped to higher ratings on the national scale.

The principal methodology used in rating Newsan S.A. and PILISAR S.A. was Asian Consumer Electronics published in December 2010. The principal methodology used in rating MIRGOR S.A. was Global Automotive Supplier Industry published in May 2013. The principal methodology used in rating Holcim (Argentina) S.A. was Global Building Materials Industry published in July 2009. The principal methodology used in rating Car Security S.A. was Global Business & Consumer Service Industry Rating Methodology published in October 2010. The principal methodology used in rating Electroingenieria S.A. and Jose Cartellone Construcciones Civiles S.A. was Global Construction Methodology published in November 2010. The principal methodology used in rating Longvie S.A. was Global Consumer Durables published in October 2010. The principal methodology used in rating Sullair Argentina S.A. was Global Equipment and Automobile Rental Industry published in December 2010. The principal methodology used in rating Pan American Energy LLC, Pan American Energy LLC, Argentine Branch, and Petrobras Argentina S.A. was Global Independent Exploration and Production Industry published in December 2011. The principal methodology used in rating YPF Sociedad Anonima was Global Integrated Oil & Gas Industry published in November 2009. The principal methodology used in rating AMS Foods International S.A. and Arcor S.A.I.C. was Global Packaged Goods published in June 2013. The principal methodology used in rating Alto Parana SA, Papel Misionero S.A.I.F.C., and Zucamor S.A. was Global Paper and Forest Products Industry published in October 2013. The principal methodology used in rating CableVision S.A. was Global Pay Television - Cable and Direct-to-Home Satellite Operators published in April 2013. The principal methodology used in rating Asociacion de Cooperativas Argentinas Coop. and Quickfood S.A. was Global Protein and Agriculture Industry published in May 2013. The principal methodology used in rating Raghsa S.A. was Global Rating Methodology for REITs and Other Commercial Property Firms published in July 2010. The principal methodology used in rating Carsa S.A. was Global Retail Industry published in June 2011. The principal methodology used in rating Aluar Aluminio Argentino S.A.I.C. was Global Steel Industry published in October 2012. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com.ar for a copy of these methodologies.

Moody's National Scale Credit Ratings (NSRs) are intended as relative measures of creditworthiness among debt issues and issuers within a country, enabling market participants to better differentiate relative risks. NSRs differ from Moody's global scale credit ratings in that they are not globally comparable with the full universe of Moody's rated entities, but only with NSRs for other rated debt issues and issuers within the same country. NSRs are designated by a ".nn" country modifier signifying the relevant country, as in ".mx" for Mexico. For further information on Moody's approach to national scale credit ratings, please refer to Moody's Credit rating Methodology published in October 2012 entitled "Mapping Moody's National Scale Credit Ratings to Global Scale Credit Ratings".
 

fagiano83

Nuovo forumer
Ciao...ho le global 17 usd in carico con pmc 85 e cambio 1,28 ca.....se le vendessi oggi che calcolo devo fare per capire se mi conviene vendere?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Alto