LEHMAN BROTHERS QUARTO ATTO

Honorable Shelley C. Chapman

Wednesday, July 26, 2017



10:00 AM
08-13555-scc Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. Ch. 11
Adversary proceeding: 12-01044-scc Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. et al v. CITIBANK, N.A. et al
LBHI v. Citibank Trial
 
Docket # 55833

Filed Jul 25 2017


Notice of Adjournment of Hearing on the Motion of Plan Administrator Pursuant to Sections 8.4, 9.3, and 14.1 of the Modified Third Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and Its Affiliated Debtors to Estimate Claims for Reserve and Distribution Purposes (2017) (related document(s)[54904]) filed by Garrett A. Fail on behalf of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.. with hearing to be held on 8/17/2017 at 10:00 AM at Courtroom 623 (SCC) (Fail, Garrett) Less
Debtor: 08-13555 Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
 
Ricordate come eravamo rimasti con LBIE?

Siamo in inghilterra questa volta.

La procedura fallimentare inglese certifica che, alla quasi fine della giostra, c'è un surplus di 8 miliardi di sterline.

Cosa farne di questa montagna di denaro?

Lehman Brothers Administration: Court considers what to do with the £8 billion surplus

United Kingdom July 14 2017


The English Supreme Court has considered various new categories of creditor claims against a company with unlimited liability in administration where, unusually, there was enough money to pay all creditors and a surplus existed.

In proceedings commonly referred to as the Waterfall I litigation, the Supreme Court considered issues relating to the distribution of funds from the estate of Lehman Brothers International Europe (in administration) (LBIE), in circumstances where there was a surplus of assets amounting to approximately £8 billion.

Unsurprisingly, various unsecured creditors, including another Lehman group company, Lehman Brothers Holdings Intermediate 2 Limited (LBHI2), sought a recovery against the surplus. The Waterfall I litigation was intended to resolve certain lacunas in UK insolvency legislation relating to currency conversion claims, statutory interest, and the ranking of subordinated debt, in addition to other issues concerning LBIE’s, somewhat unusual, structure as an unlimited company.

The Supreme Court judgment

In respect of the above issues, the Supreme Court held that:

  • Statutory interest and non-provable liabilities must be satisfied before any of the surplus monies can be used to pay subordinated debts.
  • It is not open to foreign currency creditors to claim for any currency exchange shortfall as a non-provable debt of an administration.
  • The payment of statutory interest accruing whilst a company is in administration is only payable during the period of the administration, and cannot for example be claimed during subsequent liquidation proceedings.
The Supreme Court recognised that a number of gaps exist in UK insolvency legislation, but declined to either give guidance on or rewrite the statutory provisions on the basis that the legislation had not intended for these gaps to be filled. In so doing, the court has left this task for the legislature.

Lehman Brothers Administration: Court considers what to do with the £8 billion surplus - Lexology
 
Pag. 9. IL Sole Plus 24 Ore di oggi. Buon giorno

ss.jpg
 
Pag. 9. IL Sole Plus 24 Ore di oggi. Buon giorno

Vedi l'allegato 440071

Grazie Stefanofabb.

Parlado di avvocati e dintorni, mi sento di rivolgere un accorato appello a tutti subordinati delle due banche venete ad essere molto attenti a quello che propone il web.

Infatti in circostanze analoghe anche per Lehman Brothers si verificò questo tipo di fenomeno: avvocati che si propongono per risolvere il problema della perdita dei risparmi ad un pubblico che versa, per definizione, in stato di necessità e di confusione.

La storia ci dice che, in quel caso, le cose andarono malissimo: non solo la causa fu persa ma gli incauti attori furono pure condannati al pagamento delle spese processuali, spese di CTU e avvocati di parti convenute. Insomma una sconfitta totale.

Quindi ci vuole discernimento e logica: bisogna affidarsi solo a chi sia in grado di centrare almeno buoni motivi per proporre giudizio.

Poi......altrimenti si corre seriamente il rischio di rimeterci altro denaro vivo sul denaro morto!
 
Docket # 55872

Filed Jul 28 2017


Operating Report / June 2017 Post-Effective Operating Report Filed by Garrett A. Fail on behalf of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.. (Fail, Garrett)
Debtor: 08-13555 Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
 
Honorable Shelley C. Chapman

Monday, July 31, 2017



10:00 AM
08-13555-scc Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. Ch. 11
Adversary proceeding: 12-01044-scc Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. et al v. CITIBANK, N.A. et al
LBHI v. Citibank Trial
 
Honorable Shelley C. Chapman

Tuesday, August 01, 2017



11:00 AM
08-13555-scc Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. Ch. 11
Adversary proceeding: 12-01044-scc Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. et al v. CITIBANK, N.A. et al
Trial
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Alto