Portafogli e Strategie (investimento) Dal Flight to Quality all'HY: nove mesi "after-Lehman", is debt back ? (vol. V)

Stato
Chiusa ad ulteriori risposte.
Ciao i98mark, grazie come al solito per la grande mole di notizie ce dai e per le tue considerazioni sempre interessanti, chiedo a te o ad altri: esistono fondi o meglio Etf che investono solo su obbligazioni HY?

Ho trovato questo della Barclays che mi sembra interessante,

https://www.spdrs.com/product/fund.seam?ticker=JNK

si compra anche con Fineco con questo nome: Barclays Capital High Yield Very Liquid-SP (JNK.N)

Ne conoscete altri?
:ciao:

Ciao, certo che ne esistono, ce ne sono molti. Non li seguo perché ho scarsa visibilità su quello che hanno in pancia, e quando se ne parlò sul FOL qualche anno fa (trovi lì da qualche parte una discussione sul tema in sezione obbligazioni), ho ribadito la mia scarsa simpatia per lo strumento, proprio a causa di questo suo limite.

Se vai sul sito di Morningstar, non dovresti avere problemi a trovarli.

Mi raccomando la cautela....
 
Sì certo non ti preoccupare...:)

So che le HY hanno corso tanto, era per capire se qualcuno ha in portafoglio Etf o fondi HY e conoscendogli ci da qualche indicazione.

Io ho parecchie obbligazioni HY e pensavo di ridurle visti i grossi guadagni,:cool: stavo anche valutando l'ipotesi di passare a Etf o fondi che hanno il vantaggio di essere più diversificati.
 
Sì certo non ti preoccupare...:)

So che le HY hanno corso tanto, era per capire se qualcuno ha in portafoglio Etf o fondi HY e conoscendogli ci da qualche indicazione.

Io ho parecchie obbligazioni HY e pensavo di ridurle visti i grossi guadagni,:cool: stavo anche valutando l'ipotesi di passare a Etf o fondi che hanno il vantaggio di essere più diversificati.

Su Morningstar, di solito trovi indicati i primi 10 titoli presenti nel fondo in termini percentuali... di solito ti danno indicazioni su di un 25-30% del capitale investito, e qualcosa si può già capire... però resta l'incognita del 70% rimanente, sebbene la diversificazione giochi a favore, come giustamente rammenti.

Ricordo che quando se ne parlò sul Fol, la gran parte aveva quale primo investimento per consistenza bond GM...
 
Articolo decisamente interessante di bloomberg, che tratta alcuni importanti fatti in atto negli ultimi 2-3 mesi nel mercato del credito che dovrebbero ulteriormente invitare alla cautela.

Leverage Rising on Wall Street at Fastest Pace Since ‘07 Freeze


By Kristen Haunss and Jody Shenn

Aug. 28 (Bloomberg) -- Banks are increasing lending to buyers of high-yield company loans and mortgage bonds at what may be the fastest pace since the credit-market debacle began in 2007.
Credit Suisse Group AG and Scotia Capital, a unit of Canada’s third-largest bank, said they’re offering credit to investors who want to purchase loans. SunTrust Banks Inc., which left the business last year, is “reaching out to clients” to provide financing, said Michael McCoy, a spokesman for the Atlanta-based bank. JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Citigroup Inc. are doing the same for loans and mortgage-backed securities, said people familiar with the situation.
“I am surprised by how quickly the market has become receptive to leverage again,” said Bob Franz, the co-head of syndicated loans in New York at Credit Suisse. The Swiss bank has seen increasing investor demand for financing to buy loans in the past two months, he said.
Federal Reserve data show the 18 primary dealers required to bid at Treasury auctions held $27.6 billion of securities as collateral for financings lasting more than one day as of Aug. 12, up 75 percent from May 6.
The increase suggests money is being used for riskier home- loan, corporate and asset-backed securities
because it excludes Treasuries, agency debt and mortgage bonds guaranteed by Washington-based Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac of McLean, Virginia or Ginnie Mae in Washington. Broader data on loans for investments isn’t available.

Before Bear

The increase over that 14-week stretch is the biggest since the period that ended April 2007, three months before two Bear Stearns Cos. hedge funds failed because of leveraged investments. The world’s largest financial institutions have taken $1.6 trillion in writedowns and losses since the start of 2007, helping to trigger the worst financial calamity since the 1930s, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
Lending to purchase loans rated below investment grade and mortgage bonds is part of this year’s recovery in credit markets. Companies sold $889 billion of corporate bonds in the U.S. this year, a record pace, Bloomberg data show. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index rose 52 percent since March 9, the best rally since the Great Depression.
Some areas of the credit market haven’t returned to the levels from before the collapse in real estate. Lenders are also requiring more collateral for loans.

Drop in Loans

Banks arranged $61.8 billion of leveraged, or high-yield, loans this year, a 74 percent decline from the same period in 2008, and 91 percent lower than two years ago, Bloomberg data show. Leveraged loans are rated below Baa3 by Moody’s Investors Service and BBB- by S&P of New York. No bonds containing new mortgages have been sold this year, except those with government backing, according to industry newsletter Inside MBS & ABS of Bethesda, Maryland.
The Fed data on loans by primary dealers is down from $113.8 billion in 2007. The data reflects so-called reverse- repurchase financing, securities-lending agreements and other arrangements.
Financing purchases of assets is filling cracks left by the government, whose lending programs to end the recession didn’t address some of the riskiest parts of the consumer and corporate debt markets.
The Fed’s $1 trillion Term Asset-Backed-Securities Loan Facility can’t be used to buy residential mortgage bonds and leveraged loans.
The Treasury Department’s $40 billion Public- Private Investment Program excludes the loans and mortgage bonds that are repackaged into new securities.

‘Political Pressure’

“There is a lot of political pressure on banks to lend and this is one form,” said Ratul Roy, head of structured credit strategy at Citigroup in New York.
The Fed and government programs prompted sales of securities backed by auto loans, credit cards, equipment leases and auto-dealership debt.
Yields on top-ranked debt backed by auto loans and credit cards have fallen by as much as 2 percentage points relative to benchmark rates. The yield premium has shrunk to less than 1 percentage point since TALF began in March, according to Charlotte, North Carolina-based Bank of America Corp. data. The average interest rate on loans for new cars declined to 3.88 percent in June, from 8.23 percent in January, Fed data show.
The Fed is also buying as much as $1.25 trillion of so- called agency mortgage bonds. Fixed-rate, 30-year mortgages to borrowers with good credit who put money down are 5.29 percent, according to North Palm Beach, Florida-based Bankrate.com, or 1.85 percentage points more than 10-year Treasuries. The gap was 3.05 percentage points at the end of 2008.

Leveraged-Loan Prices

The increase in bank financing tracks a rebound in demand for securities and assets.
Prices for leveraged loans tumbled to a record low 59.2 cents on the dollar on average Dec. 17, before rebounding to 83.5 cents on Aug. 27, according to the S&P/LSTA U.S. Leveraged Loan 100 Index.
As much as 5 cents of the gains are partly attributable to “leverage coming back into the system,” according to Franz at Zurich-based Credit Suisse.

The senior-most bonds backed by adjustable-rate Alt-A home loans, or those with little to no documentation of a borrower’s finances, have jumped to 52 cents, from a low of 35 cents in March, according to Barclays Plc in London. Top-rated commercial-mortgage securities soared to 90 cents on average, from 72 cents in February, Merrill Lynch & Co. index data show. Merrill is a unit of Bank of America.
Credit Losses
The risk now is that new credit leads to more losses at a time when consumer and corporate default rates are rising. Company defaults may increase to 12.2 percent worldwide in the fourth quarter, from 10.7 percent in July, according to new York-based Moody’s.
U.S. financial institutions probably will report more credit losses as commercial real estate falters through next year, James Wells III, the chief executive officer at SunTrust, Georgia’s biggest lender, said in an Aug. 24 speech to the Rotary Club of Atlanta.
“If you lever up an asset at these already elevated prices, and the underlying fundamentals, like termites, start to chew through the performance of the security, at some point it becomes unsustainable,” said Julian Mann, who helps oversee $5 billion in bonds as a vice president at First Pacific Advisors LLC in Los Angeles.

No Thanks

Chimera Investment Corp., the New York-based mortgage-debt investor that raised $1.5 billion by selling stock last quarter to buy devalued assets, hasn’t taken banks up on their loan offers in part because the company isn’t sure it would be able to continue “rolling” the financing when it matures, said Matthew Lambiase, the company’s CEO.
The lack of a “robust” market means lenders may have too much power to change terms
, Lambiase said on a July 30 earnings conference call with investors and analysts.
Investments held with borrowed money by funds including Santa Fe, New Mexico-based Thornburg Mortgage Inc. and Peloton Partners LLP of London slammed the markets as retreating prices made banks wary about getting repaid.
That triggered margin calls, collateral seizures and obligations to unwind, fueling the downward spiral in credit markets. Thornburg, a 16-year-old home lender, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in May. Peloton, a hedge-fund firm run by former Goldman Sachs Group Inc. partners, shut its $18 billion ABS Fund.

Money Down

Financing terms are more stringent than before credit markets seized up.
Investors seeking loans to buy non-agency home-loan bonds typically must put down 35 percent to 50 percent
, according to four investors and bankers whose firms are using or providing the leverage and didn’t want to be named because the negotiations are private.
That compares to as little as 3 percent for top-rated mortgage bonds before the markets collapsed, according to Laurie Goodman, an analyst at Amherst Securities Group LP in New York. She was among Institutional Investor’s top-rated fixed-income analysts while at Zurich-based UBS AG from 2000 to 2008.
Banks are typically offering as much as $3 in financing for every $1 of equity investors in leveraged loans contribute, down from $6 to $7 before mid-2007, Barry Delman, a New York-based managing director of structured credit products at Scotia Capital, said in reference to so-called total return swaps. Scotia Capital is a unit of Bank of Nova Scotia in Toronto.
The swaps are a type of derivative where a bank passes on returns or losses from a pool of loans to an investor.

Citigroup, JPMorgan

The interest rate that investors are now being charged is usually between 2 percentage points and 2.75 percentage points more than the London interbank offered rate, according to Delman. Three-month Libor, or what banks charge each other for loans in dollars
, was set at 0.36 percent yesterday, according to the British Bankers’ Association.
Derivatives are contracts whose values are tied to assets including stocks, bonds, commodities and currencies, or events such as changes in interest rates or the weather.
JPMorgan and Citigroup, the second- and third-largest U.S. banks by assets, are offering similar terms, according to investors. Tasha Pelio, a spokeswoman at JPMorgan, and Jeanette Volpi, a Citigroup spokeswoman, declined to comment. Both banks are based in New York.
“To the degree leverage coming back represents a normalization of the markets, it’s a good thing,” said Michael Youngblood, a former mortgage-bond analyst who last year co- founded hedge fund Five Bridges Advisors LLC in Bethesda, Maryland. “But the idea it should be part of any permanent residential-mortgage-securities portfolio strategy is unwise.”
 
Ad agosto sono usciti degli articoli interessanti di Martin Armstrong che fa diverse ipotesi:
1) Se il DJI non supera quota 11000 vedremo testare i minimi di Marzo e probabilmente li romperemo al ribasso, ma... e qui viene il bello, prevede nuovi massimi (quindi sopra quello 2007) entro il 2015. Da lì poi arriverà una bella mazzata;

2) L'oro arriverà a 5000$ se trova supporto a 1350 - 1750.

Come fanno queste 2 cose ad andare d'accordo? Semplice, l'oro non è un hedge, un riparo, dall'inflazione, ma dalla scarsa fiducia nei confronti dello stato. Quindi, praticamente, ci sarà un ulteriore flusso di capitali che passa dal settore privato a quello pubblico.

3) Secondo Armstrong siamo già arrivati al bottom del movimento dei soldi verso il fly to quality.

Non riesco ad inserire i file pdf in allegato:
http://economicedge.blogspot.com/

C'è un menu a destra, andate gli articoli di Martin Armstrong del mese di Agosto (2009).
 
Ultima modifica:
Riprendo un discorso fatto altrove... che mi sembra utile riproporre anche qui...


"Ci sono degli indici di settore, il più conosciuto è il Merrill Lynch High Yield Master II, che spesso funge da benchmark per i fondi obbligazionari HY... ma grafici con l'andamento dell'indice devo dire di averne visti di rado...

Se ti registri sul sito pubblico di Merrill, ti forniscono una basic chart decisamente inquietante... :eek: :-o

Il link...

http://www.mlindex.ml.com

Ti devo ringraziare io... la scalata dell'HY è stata così vertiginosa che abbiamo superato da poco i valori di picco espressi dall'indice in occasione della bolla del 2007... devo ammettere che non me ne ero reso conto... anche se c'è da considerare il differenziale dei tassi fra la situazione attuale e quella di allora..."
 

Allegati

  • Merrill HY.JPG
    Merrill HY.JPG
    34,8 KB · Visite: 493
Ultima modifica:
Riprendo un discorso fatto altrove... che mi sembra utile riproporre anche qui...


"Ci sono degli indici di settore, il più conosciuto è il Merrill Lynch High Yield Master II, che spesso funge da benchmark per i fondi obbligazionari HY... ma grafici con l'andamento dell'indice devo dire di averne visti di rado...

Se ti registri sul sito pubblico di Merrill, ti forniscono una basic chart decisamente inquietante... :eek: :-o

Il link...

http://www.mlindex.ml.com

Ti devo ringraziare io... la scalata dell'HY è stata così vertiginosa che abbiamo superato da poco i valori di picco espressi dall'indice in occasione della bolla del 2007... devo ammettere che non me ne ero reso conto... anche se c'è da considerare il differenziale dei tassi fra la situazione attuale e quella di allora..."

Boh...
Avendo, purtroppo per miei sbagli, troppi bond hy tutta questa risalita ai livelli 2007 non la vedo nel mio portafoglio. Certo alcuni emittenti sono risaliti parecchio ma ai livelli 2007 non ci sono ancora, prendo il grafico come augurio per le prox settimane...
:-o
 
Boh...
Avendo, purtroppo per miei sbagli, troppi bond hy tutta questa risalita ai livelli 2007 non la vedo nel mio portafoglio. Certo alcuni emittenti sono risaliti parecchio ma ai livelli 2007 non ci sono ancora, prendo il grafico come augurio per le prox settimane...
:-o

Perché ci sono ancora molti emittenti che andranno incontro "di necessità" a swap distressed ... e credo che lì lo spazio di ulteriore recupero possa emergere solo quando un miglioramento stabile del contesto macroeconomico si traducesse in aspettative di crescita degli EBITDA che porti ad una riduzione della leva (e di conseguenza ad un miglioramento dei rating)... prima di allora, si resta esposti a fattori di rischio che per ora il mercato ha ritrosia ad accettare...
 
Merrill rivede i propri indici di settore sull'HY in modo da escludere dagli stessi i bond bancari HY (perpetuals e subordinati), affluiti copiosi nel settore, alterandone le tradizionali logiche.

I fund managers dell'HY hanno quindi chiesto che questi bond fossero tolti dagli indici di settore, ufficialmente in quanto i fattori di natura politica che ne condizionano l'andamento sono estranei alle valutazioni consuete, che focalizzano su elementi quali il leverage ed i debt ratios, i flussi di cassa ecc.

Invero, probabilmente anche il livello di taroccamento ammesso dei bilanci bancari è tale per cui i poveri fund managers, anche volendo, avrebbero notevoli difficoltà a capire cosa viene in futuro per i bond HY bancari (questo però loro non lo dicono...).

C'è poi un problema di ordine quantitativo, visto che il debito HY del settore bancario e finanziario aveva totalizzato il 24% dei bond rappresentati nell'indice Merrill in euro, ed il 59% di quello nell'indice in GBP.

I salvataggi bancari in Europa hanno permesso una risalita miracolosa (e priva di giustificazione sotto il profilo dei fondamentali) dei corsi di molti bond bancari HY, ed i manager dei fondi HY che non avevano trattato questa tipologia di debito si sono trovati, secondo la Reuters, a sottoperformare gli indici di riferimento, "loro malgrado".

Peraltro (e qui una nota di colore ... :D) anche quelli che hanno gestito questa tipologia di debito si lamentano del grande lavoro - per loro del tutto inconsueto - che hanno dovuto svolgere su "prospetti da 300 pagine risalenti a 5-6 anni fa" e "dalla complicata terminologia legale", lavoro necessario per capire che probabilità tali bond avrebbero avuto di vedersi coinvolti in deferrals, mancati ripagamenti ecc.

Sebbene soddisfatto dei risultati ottenuti ad oggi, il gestore sentito dalla Reuters esclude di avere in portafoglio perpetuals di qui ad 1 anno.

L'esclusione dagli indici infatti porta con sé anche l'alleggerimento, se non l'esclusione, dai portafogli dei gestori dei bond HY, che rispetto a quegli indici andranno a parametrare la loro performance.

Tant'è che, esclusi o sottopesati da fondi settoriali HY, i perpetuals saranno acquisiti per tramite di fondi che ammettono quale asset class di investimento qualsiasi tipologia di debito.

New high-yield bond indexes exclude bank debt

Thu Aug 27, 2009 6:49am EDT

* Junk bond markets swamped by lower-ranking bank debt
* Bank debt inflow alters index risk profile, investors say
* Some see opportunities in bank debt as strategies vary

By Jane Baird and Natalie Harrison

LONDON, Aug 26 (Reuters) - Bank of America-Merrill Lynch has launched new high-yield bond indexes to exclude bank debt, which has flooded the junk market this year and upset investors whose strategies focus mostly on industrial companies.

The move by the leading provider of high-yield indexes came at the instigation of fund managers, who see bank debt as subject to political pressures more than to factors they typically analyze, such as debt ratios and cash flows.

"The index suddenly had the contamination of all these financials coming in and distorting the strategy," said Alex Vaskevitch, a manager at hedge fund LNG Capital.

"We deal with corporate debt, not banks, because that involves political issues and other issues not in line with our strategy, so we wanted to clean it out of the index."


Senior bonds from crisis-hit banks often continue to be ranked investment grade, but subordinated debt has frequently fallen to junk, particularly Tier 1 perpetual notes -- or hybrids -- which rank between debt and equity.

Banks can stop making payments on the debt without triggering default, and European countries have told a number of banks they rescued with taxpayer money to do so, introducing hard-to-predict policy risk into the market.

Before the wave of bank debt, the European junk bond market consisted mostly of industrial and service companies such as Norske Skog, HeidelbergCement or TUI AG, whose bonds require an analysis of fundamental and financial factors.

"For us, the European corporate credits are a more accurate picture of what high-yield is," said Peter Aspbury, head of high-yield research for European Credit Management.

Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS.L), Commerzbank and Bank of Ireland (BKIR.I) are all examples of bailed-out banks, whose senior debt is still rated investment grade but whose lower-ranking paper is now junk.

DO YOUR HOMEWORK

Financial debt had swollen to around 14.4 percent of Banc of America-Merrill's global high-yield bond index as of Aug. 21 from around 2 percent in early 2007.

In Europe, the sector accounts for more than 24 percent of the euro bond index and almost 59 percent of the sterling index.

"We have released many indices over the past half-year to year that exclude various segments of the financial sector," said Phil Galdi, managing director of global bond indices at Banc of America Securities-Merrill Lynch.

Junk bond managers who ignored junk-rated bank debt over the past six months are likely to have underperformed the main index as Tier 1 prices have rebounded to between 30 and 50 cents on the euro from lows below 10 cents in March.


"I can imagine there will be plenty of high-yield fund managers crying into their bonus pots," said Philip Milburn, a fund manager at Aegon Asset Management.


"Our mandate from clients is to get as good a return as possible from anything that is rated high-yield," he said.

British fund firm Liontrust Asset Management (LIO.L) began looking at subordinated bank notes in February and March.

"We had to do an enormous amount of work on it," said Paul Owens, head of fixed income research.

Owens pored over 250-page regulatory filings to evaluate bank finances as well as 300-page prospectuses from five and six years ago to sort out complex legal language determining whether a security was more or less likely to be repaid
.

He reviewed historical precedents including Continental Illinois, the U.S. savings-and-loan crisis and Sweden's banking crisis for clues on what regulators were likely to do. "You had to figure they were reading the same documents we were."

The resulting Tier 1 investments "have been very good to us", Owens said. "If you do that homework, you can get handsomely paid for it."

He added, however, that the firm will probably not have Tier 1 in its portfolios a year from now.


ECM, meanwhile, manages subordinated bank debt separately from its non-financial high-yield exposure.

"We consider it to be its own asset class, and where we do buy it, it is for diversified funds where we have a remit to invest in virtually any asset class considered to be European credit," Aspbury said. (Editing by Rupert Winchester)
 
Ultima modifica:
Dopo sei mesi di congelamento pressocchè totale, sono esplose le emissioni di obbligazioni high yeld da parte di emittenti di paesi in via di sviluppo.

Gli spread continuano a diminuire, seppure al ritmo più basso da marzo scorso, mentre il tasso di default continua a crescere.

Emerging-Market Junk Bond Rally Crimped by Sales (Update1)




By Lester Pimentel
Sept. 4 (Bloomberg) -- Developing-nation junk bonds are gaining at the slowest pace in six months after the lowest-rated companies sold more international debt in seven weeks than during the whole previous year.
Companies issued $6.5 billion of below investment-grade debt since July 16 after selling $4.95 billion in the prior 12 months, data compiled by Bloomberg show. The yield premium compared with Treasuries narrowed 71 basis points, or 0.71 percentage point, in August to 11.45 points, the smallest monthly contraction since spreads widened in February, according to JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Junk bond sales surged even as the default rate for the securities jumped eight-fold in the past year amid the global financial crisis, according to ING Groep NV. The U.S. jobless rate reached a 26-year high of 9.5 percent in June, curbing demand in the world’s biggest economy for developing-nation exports. Growth in emerging-market economies will slow to 1.5 percent this year from 6 percent in 2008, the International Monetary Fund forecasts.
“The market has such a short-term memory,” said Juan Cruz, a corporate debt analyst in New York at Barclays Plc, whose fixed-income research group was voted best in an annual survey by Institutional Investor magazine published Sept. 1. “People are reaching for yield because spreads have come down so much. If we have a major upset with regard to the U.S. recovery, then you will have a global re-pricing of risk.”

Javer, Cosan

Latin American companies with sub-investment grade ratings -- below Standard & Poor’s BBB- and Moody’s Investors Service’s Baa3 -- accounted for seven of the 13 such sales in emerging markets in the past seven weeks. There were 54 junk bond sales in the U.S. over that period, totaling $20.4 billion.
Mexican homebuilder Servicios Corporativos Javer S.A.P.I. de C.V. in Monterrey sold $180 million of five-year bonds with a 13 percent yield. Cosan SA Industria & Comercio, a Brazilian sugar processor in Piracicaba, agreed to pay about 9.6 percent on $350 million of bonds maturing in 2014. Both are rated BB- by S&P, three levels below investment grade.
“The market has been surprisingly open to a wide variety of credits in a way that would have been absolutely shocking six months ago,” said David Bessey, who manages more than $8 billion of emerging-market debt at Prudential Financial in Newark, New Jersey.

Six-Month Freeze

Developing-nation companies were frozen out of international markets after the global credit crisis prompted investors to shun all but the safest securities. There were no emerging-market junk bond sales in the six months through March 2, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
Yields jumped to as much as 22.8 percentage points over Treasuries in December from 801 points on Sept. 12, the last trading day before Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. collapsed in the world’s biggest bankruptcy, JPMorgan data show. The gap narrowed on Aug. 7 to 11.35 points, its smallest in 10 months, before widening back out to 11.56 points on Sept. 3.
Emerging-market corporate junk bonds returned 4.8 percent in August, the worst monthly performance since they tumbled 7.2 percent in February, according to JPMorgan.
Of the $129.8 billion of emerging-market junk debt outstanding during the 12 months through July, 7.23 percent fell into default, up from 0.81 percent in December, according to ING. Sixteen Latin American companies defaulted in 2009’s first half, including Monterrey-based glassmaker Vitro SAB, according to Moody’s. The global default rate for junk-rated companies was 10.7 percent over that time, Moody’s data show.

U.S. Junk

The pace of defaults in developing nations has eased since April, when missed payments peaked at $2.45 billion, ING said. In August, emerging-market junk bond defaults totaled $540 million.
David Spegel, head of emerging-market strategy at ING in New York, said the slowdown in defaults will sustain investor demand, pushing borrowing costs down further. He predicts developing-nation companies will sell another $10 billion in junk bonds by year-end.
“There’s a lot of money on the sidelines,” said Cristina Panait, an emerging-market strategist at Los Angeles-based Payden & Rygel, which manages $1 billion of emerging-market debt. “We’re going to see more companies come to market.”
The increase followed a pickup in U.S. high-yield debt that began in April. Speculative-grade sales in the U.S. jumped to $50.3 billion in the second quarter from $11.9 billion in the first three months of the year, Bloomberg data show. A total $87.1 billion of U.S. junk-rated debt has been sold this year.

‘Pull Back’

Sappi Ltd., a Johannesburg-based glossy paper maker rated BB by S&P, took advantage of the decline in borrowing costs to tap overseas markets in July. The company sold $300 million of bonds at a 13.375 percent yield and 350 million euros of notes ($497 million) at 13.125 percent. Country Garden Holdings Co., the Foshan, Guangdong-based property developer rated BB- by S&P, sold $300 million of bonds this week to yield 9.42 percentage points more than Treasuries.
With junk spreads over Treasuries still 4.32 percentage points above the 7.23-point average for the six years ending in 2007, Bevan Rosenbloom, a corporate debt analyst at RBS Securities Inc., said bond sales will taper off.
“There are not many companies that are willing to pay 13 percent to 14 percent,” Rosenbloom said in a telephone interview from Greenwich, Connecticut. “There’s definitely room to pull back.”
To contact the reporters on this story: Lester Pimentel at [email protected]
Last Updated: September 3, 2009 23:03 EDT
 
Stato
Chiusa ad ulteriori risposte.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Alto