jolli joker
Forumer storico
La aggrava sul nostro mercato gli altri son tutti sui massimi e solo grazie alle barzellette che ha raccontato il giullare negli ultimi anni.
Fib Dicembre.....si persevera nel capirci
- Creatore Discussione DRIVE
- Data di Inizio
Dogtown
Forever Ultras Ghetto
Io però non vado short su di noi, qui è un attimo che si giri.
Fondamentale che i cani tengano e scarichino come stanno facendo, Asia e Jap mi pare siano messi bene, ergo rotazione.
DRIVE
Massaio di Voghera
ed ecco qua l'articolo di ice
DRAGHI ?FLOP! NON HA PIU? LA MAGGIORANZA! | icebergfinanza
notare nell'articolo questa frase :
Ma certo non c’è bisogno di un voto unanime e la BCE può comprare titoli di Stato, peccato che quando era sotto attacco speculativo l’Italia o la Grecia , loro continuavano a dire che non era possibile, il regolamento non lo permetteva.
Non l’hanno fatto semplicemente perchè qualcuno ha suggerito loro di non farlo, l’ Italia doveva avere una lezione da non dimenticare!
DRAGHI ?FLOP! NON HA PIU? LA MAGGIORANZA! | icebergfinanza
notare nell'articolo questa frase :
Ma certo non c’è bisogno di un voto unanime e la BCE può comprare titoli di Stato, peccato che quando era sotto attacco speculativo l’Italia o la Grecia , loro continuavano a dire che non era possibile, il regolamento non lo permetteva.
Non l’hanno fatto semplicemente perchè qualcuno ha suggerito loro di non farlo, l’ Italia doveva avere una lezione da non dimenticare!
jolli joker
Forumer storico
Dany oggi non ci delizi della tua presenza qua son tutti maschiacci mica va bene cosi.
DANY1969
Forumer storico
Oggi posso seguire poco
Ma avrò sicuramente altre occasioni per rompervi le bal
... stare in vostra piacevolissima compagnia 
NickM
Forumer storico
Ieri sera hanno chiuso sotto la 200 semplice (e di conseguenza sotto l'esponenziale che è più alta) e oggi hanno aperto sopra l'esponenziale.
Simpatici vero?
L'impressione è che si voglia salire.
Scenderanno
Dogtown
Forever Ultras Ghetto
Question: You mentioned a couple of times early 2015 as a time when you’ll be reassessing your monetary policies. Are you comfortable that you will have enough information in seven weeks, when you meet again, towards the end of January, whether or not you will be able to make this type of decision, including whether to buy government bonds?
My second question is, you mentioned in the introductory statement an intended increase in the size of the balance sheet. That is stronger than you had last month when you said, an expectation, and I am just wondering if this new language is a unanimous decision by the Governing Council.
Draghi: On the first question, you see, you are in a very intelligent way trying to extract from me the date of the next decisions, and you won’t get it. Early means early. It doesn’t mean at the next meeting. It depends very much on how our assessment will go. We’ll certainly have a lot of facts to examine, namely and especially the big movement in the price of oil and what the impact of this is going to be, not only on economic activity, but also on inflation.
Let me say just two words on this, which has been the major event since we last met. Oil prices have an obvious direct impact on the price of energy, and on that ground, the effect is unambiguously positive. Just to give you a very rough estimate, our import bill of energy, of oil, fell about €10 billion between the second and the fourth quarter of this year. Now, that is about 0.2% of nominal GDP in that period. That is not going to be the final impact, because Europe also exports oil, but the net is unambiguously positive. Then you have indirect effects on the prices of, for example, transportation, the price of different transportation services, airline services, and that will have to be assessed. But then you have a third effect, which might happen if the lower prices get embedded in a lower wages formation process. So that is something that we want to look at.
We estimate the direct and indirect effects on HICP inflation are going to be 0.4pp in 2015 and 0.1pp in 2016. That is very important to keep in mind because it could alter the profile of inflation rates over the coming months, especially in the next few months. Through the indirect effects that I mentioned before, however, lower oil prices would also impact on core inflation, so we have to also be aware of this second-order phenomenon. And as I said, it’s important that it doesn’t get into second round effects, in other words that it doesn’t get embedded in inflation expectations. So there’s a lot to look at. That’s the bottom line of what I was saying. There is a lot to look at and to reassess, and to look at the medium-term outlook for inflation.
The second question is, yes indeed, intended is different from expected. It’s not simply an expectation; it’s an intention, but it’s not yet a target. So it’s something in between. It’s something in between. There was a vast majority of the members of the Governing Council, but the decision was not unanimous.
My second question is, you mentioned in the introductory statement an intended increase in the size of the balance sheet. That is stronger than you had last month when you said, an expectation, and I am just wondering if this new language is a unanimous decision by the Governing Council.
Draghi: On the first question, you see, you are in a very intelligent way trying to extract from me the date of the next decisions, and you won’t get it. Early means early. It doesn’t mean at the next meeting. It depends very much on how our assessment will go. We’ll certainly have a lot of facts to examine, namely and especially the big movement in the price of oil and what the impact of this is going to be, not only on economic activity, but also on inflation.
Let me say just two words on this, which has been the major event since we last met. Oil prices have an obvious direct impact on the price of energy, and on that ground, the effect is unambiguously positive. Just to give you a very rough estimate, our import bill of energy, of oil, fell about €10 billion between the second and the fourth quarter of this year. Now, that is about 0.2% of nominal GDP in that period. That is not going to be the final impact, because Europe also exports oil, but the net is unambiguously positive. Then you have indirect effects on the prices of, for example, transportation, the price of different transportation services, airline services, and that will have to be assessed. But then you have a third effect, which might happen if the lower prices get embedded in a lower wages formation process. So that is something that we want to look at.
We estimate the direct and indirect effects on HICP inflation are going to be 0.4pp in 2015 and 0.1pp in 2016. That is very important to keep in mind because it could alter the profile of inflation rates over the coming months, especially in the next few months. Through the indirect effects that I mentioned before, however, lower oil prices would also impact on core inflation, so we have to also be aware of this second-order phenomenon. And as I said, it’s important that it doesn’t get into second round effects, in other words that it doesn’t get embedded in inflation expectations. So there’s a lot to look at. That’s the bottom line of what I was saying. There is a lot to look at and to reassess, and to look at the medium-term outlook for inflation.
The second question is, yes indeed, intended is different from expected. It’s not simply an expectation; it’s an intention, but it’s not yet a target. So it’s something in between. It’s something in between. There was a vast majority of the members of the Governing Council, but the decision was not unanimous.
