Obbligazioni perpetue e subordinate Tutto quello che avreste sempre voluto sapere sulle obbligazioni perpetue... - Cap. 3

European Commission Approval of Alpha Bank Restructuring Plan Is Credit Positive
On 9 July, the European Commission (EC) announced that it had approved Alpha Bank AE’s (Caa1 stable,
E/caa2 stable2
) restructuring plan after the bank received state aid from the government-owned Hellenic
Financial Stability Fund (HFSF). The EC found that Alpha Bank’s restructuring plan, including its
acquisition of Emporiki Bank in 2012, was in line with the European Union’s state aid rules, and that the
bank’s aid from the state had a limited effect on competition. This development is credit positive for Alpha
Bank because it allows the bank to proceed with the uninterrupted implementation of its restructuring plan,
which has already improved its credit profile.
Among Greece’s four largest banks, Alpha Bank received the smallest amount of state support (€4 billion)
from the HFSF in June 2013, but had to submit a five-year restructuring plan to the EC. The EC’s
approval ensures that the bank can continue executing its restructuring plan without having to make any
significant adjustments. We note that the external international consultants appointed as trustees by the EC
closely monitor the bank’s restructuring plan.
Alpha Bank’s restructuring plan includes a further downsizing of the bank’s foreign operations and a focus
on the bank’s core Greek operations, the sale of non-core assets, a reduction of its operating expenses,
reinforcing its net interest income and stricter risk monitoring. The bank began implementing its plan last
year, and has produced positive results so far.
The bank has made significant progress rationalising its cost base (see exhibit), integrating Emporiki Bank,
which it acquired from Credit Agricole S.A. (A2 negative, D/ba2 stable) in 2012, and realising synergies.
We expect that the possible introduction of a voluntary retirement scheme for its employees by the end of
this year will further reduce operating costs. The bank expects annual cost savings from its voluntary
retirement scheme of around €100 million per year, or around 10% of the bank’s annualised pre-provision
income as of March 2014.
In addition, we expect that Alpha Bank’s credit profile will likely benefit from the downsizing of its foreign
operations, especially in the Balkans, where its subsidiaries are either small or not self-funded. We expect
the bank to retain its operations in Cyprus and Romania, where it has lending market shares of 7.8% and
5.7%, respectively, because the bank considers these franchises as part of its core banking assets.
Despite the significant asset quality challenges that we expect all Greek banks to continue to face, and
which will exert considerable pressure on bottom-line earnings in 2014-15, we expect Alpha Bank’s
restructuring measures to support the bank’s core pre-provision income and viability, aided by Greece’s
gradually improving economy. These factors will also allow the bank to return to the HFSF the state aid it
received through the increased participation of private-sector shareholders over the next two to three years.
 
Assicurazioni Generali’s Sale of Swiss Bank BSI Is Credit Positive
On Monday, Assicurazioni Generali S.p.A. (financial strength Baa1 stable) announced the sale of its Swiss
private-banking operations, BSI AG (Baa1 stable, C-/baa1 stable6
), to Banco BTG Pactual S.A. (Baa3
stable, D+/baa3 stable) for CHF1.5 billion. The transaction is credit positive because it improves Generali’s
Solvency I ratio, reduces leverage and streamlines Generali’s operations.
The transaction completes Generali’s strategy to dispose of non-core assets and strengthen its capital
position. The sale of BSI adds a substantial €1.24 billion to raise the total proceeds generated from asset
sales to €3.7 billion. Before this transaction, Generali had sold €2.4 billion of assets as it rationalized its
portfolio of international activities. Among those deals was Generali’s sale of Fata Assicurazioni Danni
(unrated) for €195 million, its minority activities in Mexico’s Seguros Banorte Generali (unrated) and
Pensiones Banorte Generali (unrated) for €631 million, its US life reinsurance operations for $910 million
and the placement of 12% of Banca Generali (unrated) for €185 million.
The BSI sale will boost Generali’s Solvency I ratio by 9 percentage points. Factoring in the BSI sale and
Generali’s acquisition of Czech insurer GPH (unrated), which the company expects to complete later this
year, we expect Generali’s Solvency I ratio to reach 160% by the end of this year, one year ahead of
schedule.
The BSI transaction is an important step toward Generali’s turnaround and will help the group streamline
its operations by focusing on its core insurance activities. In addition, the transaction frees up liquidity,
which will further improve Generali’s leverage position and earnings coverage. Although we expect the
transaction to generate a net loss of around €100 million (5% of year-end 2013 net income), the loss is
more than offset by the group’s increased solvency coverage and improved financial leverage metrics.
 
Exclusion of Covered Bonds from Mandatory Swap Clearing Would Be Credit Positive
On 11 July, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) released a consultation paper that
proposed excluding covered bonds from mandatory central clearing of interest rate swaps under the
European Markets and Infrastructure Directive (EMIR). The clearing exemption, which is highly likely to
be accepted by European Union legislators, is credit positive for those covered bonds that would face higher
levels of interest rate risk if they are unable to utilise swaps for hedging purposes.
Covered bond issuers are typically financial counterparties, as defined by EMIR, and as such could be
required to centrally clear interest rate swaps used to protect mismatches between the cover pool and the
covered bonds. However, because clearing requires that the swap terminate if the issuer is insolvent, the
swap cannot protect the cover pool after this time, increasing the risk of losses as a result of close-out
payments and subsequent cash flow mismatches. The market practice for covered bond swaps (and a legal
requirement in certain jurisdictions) is that swaps do not terminate on the issuer’s insolvency if the cover
pool can service payments on the swap.
The requirement to clear also necessitates both counterparties to post margin (collateral), whereas typically
the issuer does not post collateral under a covered bond swap. Cover pools do not typically contain liquid
assets that could be used as margin. As a result, even if the swap could survive an issuer insolvency, the cover
pool would likely be unable to meet its obligations under the swap, increasing the risk of losses.
The programmes that will benefit from the clearing exemption are those in jurisdictions where interest rate
swaps are typically used. These jurisdictions include France, the UK, the Netherlands, Italy and Nordic
countries excluding Denmark. In the UK, Netherlands and France, swaps are particularly beneficial because
the law does not provide for a net present value test to measure whether future asset cash flows will cover
covered bond liabilities should the issuer default.
Interest rate swaps also take on increased importance where cover pools include large numbers of loans with
long-dated fixed rate periods (typical in France and the Netherlands, and to some degree in the UK). In
other jurisdictions such as Sweden and Norway, mortgage loans in the cover pool are more likely to be
floating or have very short fixed periods so they can more easily achieve a “natural” hedging. Nevertheless,
all these jurisdictions and many others currently utilise interest rate swaps, so the removal of these swaps
would lead to increased risks to investors where alternative solutions are not adopted or are less effective at
removing interest rate risk.
The clearing exemption, which complements an earlier proposed exemption for covered bond issuers from
posting margin under non-cleared swaps, is a positive signal that regulators are looking to support the
covered bond market. However, the exemption contains some limitations and drafting ambiguities. An
important limitation applying to both exemptions is that a covered bond programme must benefit from a
legal minimum 2% over-collateralisation, which is not the case for all programmes. This provision, if
implemented in its current form, would reduce the credit-positive effect of the exemption unless national
legislators change their covered bond laws to accommodate it.
 
segnalo...bpm tier 1 pm di Milano ipotizzano truffa ai danni obbligazionisti presumo mancato pagamento cedole...ho letto sul Sole 24 ore di oggi..ma non é chiaro
 
Speriamo faccia da apripista ..............
................SNS............................

Beh,
i martiri di JD hanno già avuto un parere favorevole di un organo giudicante (diritto alla compensazione riconosciuto); qui si sono solo espressi, per ora, dei PM d'assalto :)

Facciamo cambio Rott ? :eeh:
 
Ultima modifica:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Alto