portfolioafterlife
too fast for love
While Bernstein’s book predated both those crises, he was one of the first to identify the perennial tension between those who believe the best decisions are based on quantification and numbers, built on past patterns, and those who look more to subjective degrees of belief about an uncertain future.
“The issue boils down to one’s view about the extent to which the past determines the future,” he wrote. “It is one thing to set up a mathematical model that appears to explain everything. But when we face the struggle of daily life, of constant trial and error, the ambiguity of the facts as well as the power of the human heartbeat can obliterate the model in short order.”
We have to remember, Bernstein wrote, that numbers are only tools. Computers can crunch billions of bits of data, but managing risk is as much about human judgement as it is about a mathematical equation.
“Past data from real life constitute a sequence of events rather than a set of independent observations, which is what the laws of probability demand. It is in those outliers and imperfections that the wildness lurks.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/758ec/758eca1eef01e1cf6d79ac7bc9ee86eb6d0d1e76" alt="www.evidenceinvestor.com"
The odds and the gods: the origins of risk management | TEBI
The idea of humans seeking to manage risk was once seen as blasphemous. The view in medieval times was that only God could determine our fate and that any attempt to master risk was to interfere with the forces of the universe. The distance we have travelled since those days is mapped out […]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ee95/4ee95b1a1f58fb7910fe00cdca5ede8b7990354d" alt="www.evidenceinvestor.com"